Friday, November 30, 2007

Isn't this THRILLING!

From the latest issue of Feminist-infested drivel, Glamour magazine's Best and Worst of 2007 feature:


Gutsy new moms

Melanie Brown and Bridget Moynahan remained thrilled about their pregnancies even after their relationships fell apart, just like’s Storked! blogger, Christine Coppa, did. Are their lives Christmas-card perfect? Nope. Are they proud mommies? Absolutely.

Proud of what? That these Hollywood Harlots managed to shag a noteworthy male celebrity? That they now have 18 years of child support coming from rich, famous and successful men? Proud that their publicly chronicled slutty behavior and resulting illegitimate offspring who are celebrated by the mindless cult of fame worshipers?

The worst part is that there are no doubt millions and teenage girls that read this mindless drivel and accept the notion at face value that having kids out of wedlock is an act of "Glamour."

Hey girls! You too can get knocked up by casual sex with a man! And if it doesn't work out, and your life is not Christmas Card perfect, don't worry! As long as you are proud, that is all that matters! Never mind the fact that having a fatherless child will result in a long life of financial hardship for you, and that your kid that you are so proud of is far more likely to develop learning disabilities, become a drunk or druggie, and much more likely to become a criminal! The important thing is that you are the BEST if you are PROUD MOMMY and THRILLED to be pregnant out-of-wedlock!

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Another Sign of Decline

The descent of Western Civilization into the social chaos and primitive existence of Matriarchal structured society is becoming more and more evident. Another sign of the decline is the recent trend of the last few years in which Hollywood Harlots eagerly expose their unmarried pregnancies in the nude on magazine covers.

This kind of thing is no doubt fostered by the delusions of feminist minded publishers and photographers who tell themselves that women who are pregnant are "sexy."

It is also another manifestation of the feminist centric idea that the female form, fertility and pregnancy are all goddess forms to be worshiped and celebrated. The fact that these women are not married, don't intend to get married, and are perfectly content to give birth to bastards and raise them as such, proudly and publicly, goes to show you just how far gone our societal standards of morality have fallen into disgrace.

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

Another Gold Digger Destroys her Family for $$

Wow...this story is completely amazing. As a young kid, I used to love watching Hulk Hogan battle with the Iron Sheik, Andre the Giant, and Randy the Macho Man Savage and King Kong Bundy in the bad old days of the World Wrestling Federation.

Hulk Hogan was the mythical American hero who overcame tremendous odds to defeat mind-boggling, athletic, muscle bound villains and gigantic behemoths of humanity, while urging the kids to say their prayers and take their vitamins. He captured my pre-teen imagination like no other wrestler. I have no shame in admitting I was once a "Hulkamaniac" as a 12 year old boy.

Having since long outgrown Professional Wrestling in my early teen years, I still have fond memories of the excitement I used to have watching the Wrestlemania pay per views at friend's houses and cheering for the Hulkster to overcome the seemingly impossible odds against wrestlers like Andre the Giant.

But now it seems like the mighty Hulkster who defeated so many intimidating opponents is about to be defeated by a much more insidious and dangerous foe than he ever faced in the ring...his materialistic, gold-digging wife.

From The Superficial blog:

Linda Bollea, the wife of wrestler Hulk Hogan, is seeking half of the couple’s assets after filing for divorce last week. She also wants an unspecified amount in alimony and health insurance for their son Nick Bollea, according to People:

Linda is seeking to split the couple's assets, which include the 17,000-square-foot Bel Air mansion where the family primarily lives and a 3,474-square-foot home in Clearwater Beach, Fla., as well as a condo under construction in Las Vegas. The two existing homes alone are worth nearly $9.5 million.

Linda has an obsession with houses which a source for Page Six says caused rifts in her marriage to the Hulkster:

"She just goes nuts and acts like Hulk has Tom Cruise money - when he doesn't. She wanted to buy a $12 million house in LA, and when Hulk refused, she went ahead and rented a $35,000-a-month house. They already have four to five houses and she wants more?"

This is the perfect example of the kind of power and leverage the feminsts wanted to give females in the institution of marriage. They worked to turn the Patriarchal model of family into nothing more than a tool to enable women to blackmail, extort and become financial parasites off of men.

Hogan's wife demanded he buy what she wanted. When he wouldn't give in to her base materialism and greed, she now resorts to turning to the State system instituted by the radical feminists to forcibly pin him down in "family" court, pile drive his finances and body slam her family into fractured oblivion...all to satiate her greed and crass materialism.

What a whore.

I think MGTOW will continue to grow as more and more of these stories become common.

Monday, November 26, 2007

The Original Counter-Feminist

When I have the time, I always take some time to google up articles, columns and other such findings related to topics that interest me...including MRA topics, of course.

It's always a pleasure to find writings I've never before had the opportunity to peruse, but upon finding them, find myself nodding in agreement.

And today, I'd like to talk about one such find: the townhall column archives of Philis Schlafly.

Mrs. Schlafly was the original Counter-Feminist...and I say that not to cast aspersions or to slight Fidelbogen and the title of his most excellent blog, Counter-Feminist, at all - but to merely point out that at a time when the feminists made tremendous headway into the consciousness of mainstream American, Philis Sclafly was one woman who stood up, and fought against the tide of popular political propaganda put forth by the feminists, and successfully lobbied and fought to stop the feminist's attempts to legislate feminist philosophy into law, the Equal Rights Amendment.

In a column tribute to Schlafly, Ann Coulter noted:

When Schlafly took up her battle against the ERA, the Senate had passed it by 84 to 8. The House had passed it by 354 to 23. The ERA was written in to both the Republican and Democratic Party platforms. Thirty states had approved it in the first year after it was sent to the states for ratification. Only eight more states were needed.

But the ERA had not yet faced Phyllis Schlafly. Over the next eight years, thanks to Schlafly and her Eagle Forum, only five states ratified it -- but five other states rescinded their earlier ratifications.

The fact that she is a major player in defeating the radical feminists should make her an eternal hero to the MRA movement. Schlafly made a huge impact in decades ago, but she is by no means finished in her work in exposing the lies, deceit and family-destroying legislation and propaganda the feminists constantly attempt to foist upon society.

The following are some excerpts from a few of her columns...points that make so much common sense, it's easy to see why this woman has been such an effective Counter-Feminist throughout her career as a Pro-Family advocate.

Schafly on Children's Rights in Divorce:

It would seem that maintaining the father's love and authority would be crucial when a child's life is turned upside down by divorce. Yet, family courts routinely deprive children of one parent, usually the father, restricting his time with his child to about six days a month. The courts pompously assert they are invoking "the best interest of the child," but how can it be in the best interest of children to make them forfeit one parent?

Schlafly on U.S. women doing fine without International Violence Against Women Act

The International Violence Against Women Act is based on the lie that violence against women is the same problem in all countries. Many non-Western countries have social norms that justify abuse (such as genital mutilation, forced marriage, and polygamy), and "international standards" would vastly diminish the rights and benefits U.S. women now enjoy.

U.S. women are the most privileged class of people on the face of the earth. That's because we are the beneficiaries of the Judeo-Christian civilization, including the requirement in the Ten Commandments to honor mothers and the Christian religion that honors the Virgin Mary and respects women.

Schlafly on exposing Hillary Clinton's Presidential Campaign's "Mom Strategy"

Clinton invites us to "imagine a country in which nearly all children between the ages of 3 and 5 attend preschool in sparkling classrooms." That children's paradise is France, which "makes caring for children a top priority," and where "more than 90 percent of French children between ages 3and 5 attend free or inexpensive preschools."

The assumption of "It Takes a Village" is that daycare, run by tax-salaried and licensed "professionals" in centers regulated by the government, is preferable to mother care. Clinton even praises the fact that many French children are in full-day programs "even before they reach the age of 3."

The re-issue of Hillary's old book dispels the notion that she is re-inventing herself as a moderate. Her mom strategy is badly out of sync with her book praising a country that starts government daycare for children at age 2.

Schlafly on United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women.

The notion is downright ridiculous that American women (the most fortunate class of people who ever lived) should submit to a treaty that dictates uniform rules for 185 other nations, all of which treat women worse than the United States.

It's good to see Mrs. Schlafly is still going strong, writing a lot of columns in the past year. The fact that she is largely unrecognized for her efforts speaks volumes to how much popular culture and the mainstream media will only idolize women who toe the politically correct, feminist line.

As Ann Coulter concluded her tribute:

That Phyllis Schlafly is the mortal enemy of a movement that claims to promote women tells you all you need to know about the feminists.

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

Husband Wins Lotto - Tries to Escape Marriage

Here's an interesting story...

Wife's at a loss to find husband after he wins the lottery

A former beauty queen is suing her airline-mechanic husband, claiming he tried to hide his lottery jackpot from her.

Ha ha ha ha!

Now, without really knowing the personal circumstances of the actual story -- the story in the paper is quite slanted to give a favorable point of view to the woman (surprise, surprise) -- what do you wanna bet this lady has been anything else but a pleasant, loving wife?

Any happily married couple would have an ecstatic husband coming home to bring home the good news to his wife that they've hit the big time and all financial worries are over....instead, this guy makes some plans in secret to buy a new house and leave her.

Now you may wonder why I would guess that this is the case without any real evidence. I say, one only has to see what she has to say on the matter to get a little insight into the kind of woman she is, and why the lotto winner was so desperate to escape her...

Campbell said she needs her husband's lottery winnings to help pay bills and support herself.

'Right now, all I want is justice,'' she said. ``With time, I will file for divorce.''

Now she might actually be a very nice lady who is getting screwed over by a conniving husband...but I doubt it.

Happily married men in love with their wives are not going to do something like this. Somehow, I get the impression he felt trapped by a selfish, standard American Woman with an entitlement princess attitude, and he probably looked at hitting the lotto as his only chance to escape.

Get ready Mr. Campbell...when you are finally tracked down and summoned to court, your soon-to-be ex-wife is going to drag you into court where the gears of a female-favoring system is going to chew you up and spit you out.

Hopefully you played it smart and you fled the country and are now happily living in Mexico or some other country where the US Divorce/Family courts can't get you!

Thursday, November 15, 2007

Feminized American Television

Were American television was once subtly promoted a pro-American, pro-family reflection of the American experience, it is now absolutely saturated in the modern day, mainstream religion: secular, anti-American, feminist-liberal socialism.

American TV is nothing more than a virtual, 24-7 vagina-centric appeal to the female fantasy; a cynical, lowest-common denominator product; an estrogen-saturated broadcast designed to promote materialistic and shallow consumerism of the American female psyche. (And from what little I did manage to watch while on vacation, I can say with some confidence that UK TV is in the same state - if not worse!).

Even a few of the most liberal, feminist minded creatures in America - the pro-feminist, female media journalists are starting to recognize this fact; albeit they still don't see the big picture, some of them are still starting to be a little troubled by the more obvious manifestations.

Case in point:
On TV, men are the new weaker sex

This is the strange state of ABC's female-friendly Thursday night lineup: It has become a night of emasculated men and emasculating women. If the classic male pinup was the strong, silent, unattainable type, tonight's TV dream man is addled and fawning. And the empowered woman - once a happy departure from older stereotypes - has become not just self-sufficient, but kind of mean.

Uh...hello Ms. Joanna Weiss...this particular meme is not "new." It's been the overriding theme of the standard fare of American TV for decades now. Before the ascendancy of feminism in mainstream culture, the typical TV show usually depicted a competent, decent father figure that had the respect of his wife and family. But that particular character trait is all but gone...replaced by the ubiquitous depiction of the bumbling idiot who barely ties his own shoelaces without his super-competent, do-it-all-know-it-all wife/girlfriend/mother/daughter to tell him how he's screwing everything up.

In one sense, this is gender-bending stuff as old as Shakespeare, imagining what things might be like if men were more like women, and vice versa. But on ABC, role-reversal is pursued with such vigor that it feels like a social mission: a feverish, wholly off-putting attempt to break free of the boy-meets-girl formula.

Ha! Only now is it starting to feel like a social mission? It's been one all along! Ms. Weiss only begins to recognize the feminism-as-social-mission theme of modern American TV because it has been getting more and more blatant. Where it once a subtle, undercurrent of one or two emasculated male characters or super-capable females in a few commercials or one or two TV shows, these caricatures of feminist fantasy are now ubiquitous! And this indulgence in feminist folly is driving male viewers away from TV in droves.

Only now are women themselves beginning to realize how off putting this distorted portrayal of an entire gender is.

There's something unsatisfying about watching rich guys wallow in their powerlessness, perhaps because it puts us in the odd position of wondering who to root for: the venal women or the men they can so easily crush.

There's something unsatisfying you say? No kidding...American television is merely the reflection of the current, confused state of the American female mind. Women feel they are entitled to it all. They've been raised by an education system that tells them they can do anything a man can do...and that they should forsake getting married and raising children to pursue careers and compete with men to show that women are "equal."

And yet the phenomena of the dissatisfied, mid-life, unmarried feminist minded career woman lamenting that there are "no good men" to get married and take care of them happily ever after appears to be growing.

In contemplating the current state of Western pop-culture, the age old question: "Does art imitate life, or life imitate art?" has been rendered irrelevant...television most certainly reflects the attitudes and ideals of the modern American feminist-centric mindset, but it certainly would be an insane stretching of the imagination to call the present day programming "art."

Even the last bastion of celebrated masculine expression on television -- male dominated sports -- has been corrupted.

Sports like NFL football are popular because it features the tension of high quality competition that sets the stage for feats of achievement that rely on excellence and striving for the perfection of execution...the higher the risk of failure, the higher the level of competition, the greater the sense of accomplishment when victory is accomplished. This is what drives Men to strive for excellence.

Yet the NFL broadcasts on all channels still feel like they HAVE to give prominent face time to women to try and "attract the female demographic."

Women fans, just like men, stand up and cheer when their favored team scores a touchdown...I've never seen a women football fan stand up and shout "YOU GO GIRL" whenever a female sideline reporter corners a player to ask him how he feels about something. And the female pablum and celebri-tard interviews in middle of on-the-field action seems to be taking up more and more time in every NFL broadcast.

How long before we see the "first woman" playing in an NFL game...and the endless glorification of her "accomplishment?" My prediction? They'll have to change the rules first, so that men are not allowed to tackle her. Then we'll see how the genders really are equal on the gridiron!

Feminists have ruined television programming, and it's corrupting Sports. But at least there are still a few areas that are a last bastion of masculine portrayals left on TV. and were it not for NFL football and a couple of shows that fly against the conventional norms of feminist indoctrination (shows like House), I would never watch network TV at all.

Tuesday, November 13, 2007

Unintended Consequences: There is ALWAYS a price to pay.

One of feminism's anchor issues was the absolute right of women to have control over their sex lives without judgment, and that they should not be criticized or discriminated against for "acting just like men" and being promiscuous.

The so-called "Free-love" 60's were supposed to unleash a golden age of freedom for women...the results are now in.

U.S. sets record in sexual disease cases

There is no such thing as "Free Love."

Isn't it great that the model of monogamous Patriarchy that oppressed American Women for so long is now being overthrown?!?!?!

Thursday, November 8, 2007


MIsForMalevolent asked if any MRA bloggers were interested in joining his blog and helping to I've joined up to contribute occasionally.

Misandrope has blogged extensively about his personal experiences of going through the hell of divorce in the feminized court system of New Jersey, and his archives are quite instructive to others who may be going through a similar situation themselves.

I really enjoy his format and look to run with it a bit...he's got a great blog. I don't know of any "group blogs" in the MRM, so I think it would be a great idea of other bloggers would take up the offer and make an occasional contribution!

So folks, if you're interested, let's have some fun, pick a letter and post a topic!

My first entry over there: H is for Hero

Wednesday, November 7, 2007

We Don't Need Domestic Violence Shelters for Men

Much has been written about the lies feminists have propagated about domestic violence as of late in the MRM blogosphere. Carey Roberts, Glenn Sacks, Dr. Helen and a few other noteworthy MR advocates have attempted to shine the spotlight on the facts that women are often instigators and/or co-conspirators in domestic violence cases, and that women often instigate assault on their male partners just as much, if not more than men...yet the conventional wisdom (or the successful indoctrination of society by the feminists) is that men are always the perpetrators and that women are never culpable.

While I believe it is important to expose the lies of the feminists for all to see, and that such inequity in application of the laws are important to recognize, we men need to absolutely avoid the victim mentality of the feminists and try to create the same kind of institutional programs to try and "deal with this problem."

In short, I hope I NEVER live to see "Domestic Violence Centers for Men" become a widespread phenomenon.

Men don't need shelter from abusive women.

We need shelter from an abusive SYSTEM that doesn't hold Women responsible for their own actions.

We need to fight the popular culture and media that degrades men, fathers, fatherhood and the "you go girl" mindset that gives it's tacit stamp of approval for women to physically assault men.

We need an end to television shows and advertisements that portray a blow to men's genitalia as high comedy.

Another needed change would be in favor of a complete change in the application of police procedure in domestic violence cases.

As is the case today, a woman can assault a man (frequently with an object or weapon to inflict damage,) and a man can simply shove her or forcibly disarm her to protect himself and he is the only one that gets arrested and charged...even if the man has evident physical damage and the woman only has tears streaming down her face as visual evidence when the cops show up.

I say in any domestic violence case where the police are called, they should simply arrest BOTH parties involved and charge them BOTH with domestic violence. Than, both should be administered lie detector tests to determine who instigated the first act of physical contact.

In this way, woman would no longer have the automatic assumption of innocence (imagine that, equality under the law, regardless of gender!), nor would they have the incentives to try and create false "events" of domestic abuse to use as a tool to divorce their husbands. Instigating violence would get her arrested and put into the same system he does. Furthermore, we need to make the penalties for false claims of domestic abuse to be punished just as harshly as actual abuse. As it stands right now, women have all the incentives to make up false claims and no penalties for lying to manipulate the system.

Finally, I think the most important change that needs to be implemented is to stop the practice of voiding men's Constitutional rights on the simple accusation of domestic violence from a woman. Just because a woman claims abuse does not mean a man should be forcibly kicked out of his home (especially if he can demonstrate that he bears the majority of the burden for paying the mortgage or rent), or his second amendment rights by surrendering his legally owned firearms to the State on a simple TRO taken out by a female. We are all supposed to be innocent until proven guilty...yet the feminists have managed to enact laws that ignore this constitutional principle and given women the tools to disenfranchise men from their legal property and right to life.

Men don't need shelters from abusive Women.

We need the reform of a system and society that encourages Women to be abusive in the first place.