Wednesday, May 28, 2008

Repeal the 19th Amendment

The only way in which the social engineers have corrupted our society at it's very foundation was through the agent of an expanded and empowered federal government. In short, the elite want control over humanity for their own benefit, but you cannot control a free people, so freedom must be done away with.

And the most effective way in doing so was to reverse the course of events that the Founding Fathers of America had set into motion - by destroying the building blocks of society, the nuclear family.

But the assault on the institution that resulted in the development of the greatest superpower nation the world has ever seen -- the nuclear family -- was one that has taken years to accomplish. Slowly but surely it has been achieved with incremental steps in a dialectical process that has fundamentally altered the entire dynamics of society and human being's interpersonal relationships.

The first step was to empower a centralized, Federal government. The original foundation of the nation was a loose affiliation of the States, each an autonomous entity held together by a document designed to limit the accumulation of power by a Federal entity. It would be exceedingly difficult to achieve the radical social engineering of the society we currently live under, in a country as set up and designed by the Founding Fathers.

So the first step was to empower the Federal Government...and the means of doing so was accomplished through Women's suffrage.

Is There Really a Bias Against Women in Politics? History Suggests Otherwise

Academics have for some time pondered why the government started growing precisely when it did. The federal government, aside from periods of wartime, consumed about 2 to 3 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) up until World War I. That was the first war in which government spending didn't go all the way back down to its pre-war levels. Then in the 1920s, non-military federal spending began steadily climbing.

President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal — often viewed as the genesis of big government — really just continued an earlier trend. What changed before Roosevelt came to power that explains the growth of government? The answer is women's suffrage.

For decades, polls have shown that women as a group vote differently than men. Without the women's vote, Republicans would have swept every presidential race but one between 1968 and 2004.

The gender gap exists on various issues. The major one is the issue of smaller government and lower taxes, which is a much higher priority for men than for women. This is seen in divergent attitudes held by men and women on many separate issues.

There you have it in a nutshell.

The power and ability to expand the size and scope of the Federal Government to effect the changes to society to corrupt the nuclear family and subvert the national identity was to give women the "freedom" to vote.

Except the first thing women collectively did was to vote to limit, reserve, restrict or outright eliminate individual freedoms, starting with alcohol consumption.

In all seriousness, the 19th amendment is a Pandora's box. Ron Paul has a more realistic chance to win the Presidency this Fall than there is any kind of hope that the 19th amendment would ever be repealed.

Too many generations of women have been indoctrinated into the idea that their "freedom" is defined by the right to vote for more government dependency, more misandrist gender advocacy, the institution of unconstitutional peonage and unmitigated support for the divorce and abortion industries.

It's going to take a society-wide, cataclysmic upheaval of apocalyptic proportions to reverse the trends that started with the advent of female suffrage.

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

The Enemy is Always the State

From Llew Rockwell's "The Enemy is Always the State"

Let me state this as plainly as possible. The enemy is the state. There are other enemies too, but none so fearsome, destructive, dangerous, or culturally and economically debilitating. No matter what other proximate enemy you can name — big business, unions, victim lobbies, foreign lobbies, medical cartels, religious groups, classes, city dwellers, farmers, left-wing professors, right-wing blue-collar workers, or even bankers and arms merchants — none are as horrible as the hydra known as the leviathan state. If you understand this point — and only this point — you can understand the core of libertarian strategy.

One thing is for certain - in American politics, the Democrat party, the liberal and so-called "progressive" movements are the home of the feminist movement. The conservative and Republican side is generally the home of the anti-feminist faction of America's body politic - but in the three-card monte game called the "Two Party System," the feminist agenda has continued it's long, hostile march through American society, leaving millions of lives damaged, destroyed and altered irrevocably, regardless of whichever party has had control. This is what's referred to as the dialectical process.

Whether the Republicans or the Democrats have controlled the Executive branch and the Legislative branches of government, the feminist, anti-family agenda has continued to proceed with it's implementation of reforming a country that what was once the land of the free and the home of the brave into the land of the Fee and the home of the Slave.

Remember this the next time you see a Republican politician standing in front of a crowd, or on your TV or broadcasting their voice over the radio, speaking of "family values" and "defending marriage."

While the Republican or so-called "compassionate" conservative talks about Homosexual marriage as a threat to the institution of marriage, we who have unplugged from the Matriarchy know damn well that gay marriage means NOTHING in the grand scheme of things. Two gays having a little formal ceremony and legal recognition like a heterosexual couple has, doesn't destroy marriage. Feminism's agenda of no-fault divorce; the extra-constitutional family court system; the peonage of husbands and fathers to ex-wives and their alienated children; the domestic violence industry racket; the anti-male, anti-father cultural zeitgeist and the subversion of higher education into centers of indoctrination by the feminists have done the job just fine in destroying the institution of marriage.


Because the game Republicans versus Democrats is really just a diversion to keep the nation distracted and divided so that the real agenda can continue to be implemented - the abrogation of American national sovereignty and subsuming of the USA into a Socialist One-World Global Governance.

This is why in my opinion that it is the Libertarian political philosophy that is the ONLY one tenable to the MRA movement.

Because the only sure principle in American politics is that whether it's Democans or Republicrats who control the government, the real problem is the size, scope and power of the centralized Federal government.

It is through this empowerment of the institution of Government that the ruthless, family-destroying agenda of the feminists have been legislated, subsidized, promoted and disseminated. And voting for the Republicans is not going to change this one bit, as they've already proven by their "compassionate conservatism" (i.e. socialism) that they are just as committed to growing the size and scope of the government as the liberal socialist Democrats ever were.

Of course, there are always exceptions to every rule...and in this case, that would be Ron Paul.

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Another Sign of the Times in the Age of Matriarchy

The Slump: It's a Guy Thing

They eat from the same dishes and sleep in the same beds, but they seem to be operating in two different economies. From last November through this April, American women aged 20 and up gained nearly 300,000 jobs, according to the household survey of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). At the same time, American men lost nearly 700,000 jobs. You might even say American men are in recession, and American women are not.

What's going on? Simply put, men have the misfortune of being concentrated in the two sectors that are doing the worst: manufacturing and construction. Women are concentrated in sectors that are still growing, such as education and health care.
As the blue collar sector declines, the pink collar sector ascends. While the writer of the article poses various hypothetical guesses as to why this is happening, those of us that have unplugged form the Feminist Matrix understand EXACTLY what is going on.

The troubles for the American male worker, while exacerbated by the current slump, are hardly new. The manufacturing sector is in long-term decline, and construction goes through repeated booms and busts. Meanwhile women are graduating from college at higher rates than men.

Hmmmm...the ongoing, dialectical process of the feminization of higher education, the increased promulgation of the cultural zeitgeist that directs young women to focus on education and careers instead of forming families, and the normalization of misandry in the mainstream media has been going on for the past 30+ years.

The results of this social re-engineering are becoming more and more evident to those of us that recognize the truth. But the folks that remain oblivious cling to the delusion that we still live in a Patriarchal society oppressive to women.

Another reason politicians aren't making hay of the plight of males is that they are well aware that women are in no mood for it. Working-class and lower-middle-class women in particular, whether or not their men have jobs, are feeling economically stressed, says Bill McInturff, a pollster for Senator John McCain. He adds, "In focus groups they talk about how 'I'm taking care of my parents, his parents, buying groceries, taking kids to the doctor.' These women are tired."

See, never mind that men struggle with job loss and making ends meet to support their families, it's all about how the women feel.

Friday, May 9, 2008

Spreading Disconent in the Institution of Marriage once again releases it's annual propaganda designed to instill discontent and discord amongst married couples by imputing a ridiculous valuation of the tasks a housewife performs in running a household.

Study: Stay-at-Home Mom Worth Nearly $117,000 a Year

If a stay-at-home mom could be compensated in dollars rather than personal satisfaction and unconditional love, she'd rake in a nifty sum of nearly $117,000 a year.

That's according to a pre-Mother's Day study released Thursday by, a Waltham, Mass.-based firm that studies workplace compensation.

This is the kind of garbage promoted by the mainstream media designed to influence married women to look at their familial arrangements and think they are getting the proverbial short end of the stick. Rather than look at the benefits she derives from working to raise her own children and create a home that supports a husband as a breadwinner (A HAPPY HOME! What is more important than that?!?!), she's supposed to look at her housework and child raising and think she's being oppressed, ripped-off and taken advantage of by her evil, Patriarchal husband.

See, the Matriarchy doesn't want intact, nuclear families. Much harder to control a populace made up of intact families with Men fulfilling the roles of bread winner and leader of their families.

Such agitprop was designed to push the buttons in married housewives to promote divorce, AND discourage single women from getting married in the first place - after all, why should young women put themselves in the position of "working for free" when they can just forgo marriage and child rearing, and "get paid what they are worth?"

Either way, the dual agendas of the depopulation agenda and the "make as many people dependent on Nanny State Government" agenda are both served by the perpetual proliferation of this kind of garbage.

Of course, as all propaganda, some real truths are cleverly interspersed so as to camouflage the true motivations. Consider the telling quote I put in bold from the excerpt I quoted: "...rather than personal satisfaction and unconditional love..."

As if mere money can replace those two things in any family!

Funny, but that IS EXACTLY the lie todays society is promulgating! Children don't need a loving Father to provide for, support, love and discipline them...only his indentured servitude and minimal (if even that) visitations are necessary.

The subversion of what was once a great country continues...

Wednesday, May 7, 2008

Feminism IS the Caustic Hatred of Patriarchal Society

In my last post about how feminism's depopulation agenda has affected Japan the same why in which it has affecte the Nations of what is considered "Western Civilization" , Mandy left a well thought out comment, but I must take issue with the following:

An important difference is that Japan has not thrown away it's culture and tradition. There will still be recognizable Japanese(not simply by looks but by customs) people in future generations. I wouldn't be surprised if Japan can buck the trend and encourage more babies.The feminism in Japan is not as caustic and hateful as our American grown variety. It is more about getting women into the workplace (although it has had negative effects in personal relationships - not to the same extent.) Yes, Japan is socialist but they still manage to inspire great work from their citizens, maybe from cultural pride.

Adopting feminism, and encouraging women to enter the workforce and forgo marrying, having children and raising the next generation IS throwing away their culture and tradition.

The very foundation for any culture and society is the nuclear family.

You tinker with the foundation, and you will inevitably change the culture in innumerable ways! The cultural traditions of the traditional family in Japan was an absolute Patriarchy - the Father worked long, hard hours to support the wife and children, and the wife stayed home and kept the home.

Feminism, whether it is subtly engaged in Japanese culture or given over to full blown public rhetorical expression as it is in the West, is always caustic and hateful, because the end result is caustic to the traditional Patriarchal family unit that was the bedrock of the Japanese culture.

Have a look at the prevailing attitude of the average Japanese single female...

From Japanese Women Wary to Wed

Ryuko Ishikawa, a family psychiatrist, believes 30-something women are not prepared to "repeat their mothers' mistakes" in settling for the role of housewife.

THE primary means of destroying the Patriarchal nuclear family unit is to subvert the feminine cultural mindset to demean the role of housewife. To reiterate the point, the typical Japanese women raised in todays culture does not want to "...repeat their mother's mistake of settling for the role of housewife."

What are all of the implications inherent in the proliferation of this base attitude? Women should not depend on men to provide, they need to enter the workforce and compete with men - and the only way to compete with a motivated, competitive man is to provide preferential treatment through laws to force employers to hire women, and for these women to avoid or delay marriage and child bearing...or if they don't, to dump off their children to daycare so they can maintain their careers.

Perhaps misandry is not as ubiquitous in Japanese media culture, but in the end, the results are the same - indeed, in a homogeneous country like Japan, the feminist mindset has proliferated to the point where they have reached the depopulation point quicker than in the US!

Take another feminist meme that has infected the Japanese cultural mindset from the previously linked article:

Ms Mizushima cited government research, from 1995, which suggested full-time working men spent 26 minutes each weekday on domestic chores, compared to 3 hours, 18 minutes by full-time working women. The data may now be outdated, but Ms Mizushima said the balance had not changed.

See, it's no less caustic or hateful to the institution of marriage in Japan as it is anywhere else...feminism sows the seeds of discord and contention in the basic relationship between husband and wife. Feminism has instilled the desire for Japanese women to overturn the traditional role of the female, and the predictable cultural chaos and inevitable demographic decline have occurred exactly as it has in the West.

Just as in the West, the Japanese male looks at the state of their society and wish they could find a "traditional" women to marry and find that the "New" Japanese woman is un-marriageable, because they value their careers more than the role of housewife and mother.

From Japanese Women are Increasingly Passing Up Marriage:

Men are also delaying marriage these days, but often they cite economic reasons: trouble finding a job that gives them the stability they need for married life, or reluctance to assume the responsibilities of family.

Many Japanese women, however, blame the typical male, who expects the wife to cheerfully surrender her job, or juggle a career with keeping house and raising the kids.

"It's not that we're set on being single. We're thirsting for a good marriage, but we can't find the right guy," said Sakai, a single 38-year-old. "Men haven't changed their old mind-set. Women have grown too powerful for them."

It's a dramatic reversal of the Japanese tradition that praises early marriage and criticizes women who delay marriage as unattractive and selfish.

Of course, one has to read the aforementioned and hyperlinked articles with an eye on the pro-feminist filter the writers bring to their reportage. Notice there is no mention of liberalized divorce laws...that all of the blame for the breakdown of the traditional relations between genders in Japan is given to the men.

Feminism has infected the mainstream female mindset of Japan just as badly as it has in the West. Men want the traditional roles, while the women want to have it all: the career, the kids and a husband that will assume 50% of domestic duties.

Whether it is in the West or in Japan, or anywhere else, this feminist meme that tells women they can and should "have it all" is the very root of destruction of the nuclear family and Patriarchal society.

Just because the Japanese do not have the spectacle of lesbian, man-hating college professors leading domestic violence protest marches, screaming anti-male epithets into bullhorns, basking in breathless mainstream media coverage, or do not have the same level of misandrist entertainment and commercial saturation as the West does, does not make the proliferation of the base tenet of radical feminism any less caustic or hateful to traditional culture and society.

The end results are exactly the same: men and women avoid marriage and the demographic decline that inevitably occurs.

Tuesday, May 6, 2008

Feminist Depopulation is not just for the West...

...Japan is on the verge of demographic collapse as well.

From Japan Steadily Becoming a Land of Few Children

Japan celebrated a national holiday on Monday in honor of its children. But Children's Day might just as easily have been a national day of mourning.

For this is the land of disappearing children and a slow-motion demographic catastrophe that is without precedent in the developed world.

The number of children has declined for 27 consecutive years, a government report said over the weekend. Japan now has fewer children who are 14 or younger than at any time since 1908.

The proportion of children in the population fell to an all-time low of 13.5 percent. That number has been falling for 34 straight years and is the lowest among 31 major countries, according to the report. In the United States, children account for about 20 percent of the population.

If you go on to read the entire article, you find not even an attempt to pinpoint the reasons behind the decline.

But it's pretty obvious to those of us that have unplugged from the Matriarchal world view...Japan has adopted the feminist de-population shibboleth wholesale. Women embrace careers instead of families, birth control, abortion and foregoing marriage.

Feminism is a death-cult, society killer. The results are obvious when one looks at the demographic trends of any modernized, industrialized country that has embraced feminism. How much longer will mainstream society ignore the obvious demographic decline that feminism has wrought?

Too many people are beholden to the lies and propaganda, and the truth will not be widely recognized until the socialist redistribution programs instituted in just about every first world country goes bankrupt as the next generation of replacement workers consist of a much smaller population size in comparison to the generations that are about to retire in the coming decades.

Feminism and Socialism are a two-pronged assault on Civilization, purposely designed and implemented to destroy the nuclear family, decimate the population and bankrupt the nation's treasury. As every day passes, it is becoming more and more obvious to me that we are headed to some very unpleasant times in the near future.

Are you prepared?