Wednesday, May 28, 2008

Repeal the 19th Amendment

The only way in which the social engineers have corrupted our society at it's very foundation was through the agent of an expanded and empowered federal government. In short, the elite want control over humanity for their own benefit, but you cannot control a free people, so freedom must be done away with.

And the most effective way in doing so was to reverse the course of events that the Founding Fathers of America had set into motion - by destroying the building blocks of society, the nuclear family.

But the assault on the institution that resulted in the development of the greatest superpower nation the world has ever seen -- the nuclear family -- was one that has taken years to accomplish. Slowly but surely it has been achieved with incremental steps in a dialectical process that has fundamentally altered the entire dynamics of society and human being's interpersonal relationships.

The first step was to empower a centralized, Federal government. The original foundation of the nation was a loose affiliation of the States, each an autonomous entity held together by a document designed to limit the accumulation of power by a Federal entity. It would be exceedingly difficult to achieve the radical social engineering of the society we currently live under, in a country as set up and designed by the Founding Fathers.

So the first step was to empower the Federal Government...and the means of doing so was accomplished through Women's suffrage.

Is There Really a Bias Against Women in Politics? History Suggests Otherwise

Academics have for some time pondered why the government started growing precisely when it did. The federal government, aside from periods of wartime, consumed about 2 to 3 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) up until World War I. That was the first war in which government spending didn't go all the way back down to its pre-war levels. Then in the 1920s, non-military federal spending began steadily climbing.

President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal — often viewed as the genesis of big government — really just continued an earlier trend. What changed before Roosevelt came to power that explains the growth of government? The answer is women's suffrage.

For decades, polls have shown that women as a group vote differently than men. Without the women's vote, Republicans would have swept every presidential race but one between 1968 and 2004.

The gender gap exists on various issues. The major one is the issue of smaller government and lower taxes, which is a much higher priority for men than for women. This is seen in divergent attitudes held by men and women on many separate issues.

There you have it in a nutshell.

The power and ability to expand the size and scope of the Federal Government to effect the changes to society to corrupt the nuclear family and subvert the national identity was to give women the "freedom" to vote.

Except the first thing women collectively did was to vote to limit, reserve, restrict or outright eliminate individual freedoms, starting with alcohol consumption.

In all seriousness, the 19th amendment is a Pandora's box. Ron Paul has a more realistic chance to win the Presidency this Fall than there is any kind of hope that the 19th amendment would ever be repealed.

Too many generations of women have been indoctrinated into the idea that their "freedom" is defined by the right to vote for more government dependency, more misandrist gender advocacy, the institution of unconstitutional peonage and unmitigated support for the divorce and abortion industries.

It's going to take a society-wide, cataclysmic upheaval of apocalyptic proportions to reverse the trends that started with the advent of female suffrage.


Anonymous said...

What's going on with Hillary Clinton right now and her female supporters is the best example I can think of right now as to why women shouldn't be given the vote.

so because they'r candidate cannot MATHEMATICALLY win they are getting all EMOTIONAL and HYSTERICAL to the point that they are going to stage protests against the DNC if their rulings about the Florida and Michigan delegates don't go their way... and they are willing to vote for someone of another party whom they don't agree with on issues.

They and Hillary Clinton are acting like SPOILED BRATS and entitlement princesses. Florida and Michigan broke the rules and Hillary cannot mathematicaly win the nomination so they need to GROW UP.

I don't want Obama to be president either but these Hillary supporters (and Hillary herself) are really getting on my nerves.

Anonymous said...

I would also add that the 17th amendment to the constitution contributed to the destruction of our country. It removed the power from the states, and gave it to the general population, turning us from a Republic, into a Democracy. As was noted in the Roman Empire, "Bread and Circuses" is the result as there is no check on the populus voting itself further and further "benefits" and rewarding the politicians who feed the public "voters" from the public trough.

MarkyMark said...


This is one of your BEST posts ever, and you have some good ones, Bro. Hell, I may even use it on my blog, if that's ok with you; this is good stuff!

The article you quote (written by John Lott) lays it all out for you; he answers the question of whether or not giving women the vote didn't start us down the road to socialism. It did. He says that, even in the states that didn't WANT to grant women the vote, that the size of their governments and expenditures BOTH grew after women got the vote. This reflects women's desire for security above and beyond all else.

However, I don't think that infringing on our freedoms began with women's suffrage; I think that that goes back to three seminal events in the 19th Century: the Civil War, the formation of the ICC, and the beginnings of American public schools. All these events had occurred DECADES before women got the vote. However, women's suffrage did NOT help things at all! There's no question that it was a major nail in the coffin for our nation.

What the feminazis never told us in school was that most MEN didn't have the vote, either; universal suffrage didn't exist! I think you had to own property in order to vote. I don't know if I'd go that far today, but I can certainly see the WISDOM to limiting suffrage. A vast majority of voters have NO CLUE about what the Constitution says-no clue! Anyone who even has a clue about the Constitution's contents knows that it's ALREADY been run through the shredder, figuratively speaking; we've just about lost all our rights as it is...

I don't know about you, but it bothers me that so many IDIOTS, DERELICTS, AND PARASITES vote; it bothers me! I mean, illegal aliens should NOT get the vote; for that matter, those legal, yet non-citizen, immigrants shouldn't have the vote either. Those who are citizens are seldom better; there are some real DOPES out there, and they have a say in deciding OUR FUTURE! Did you ever think about that? I'm sure you have...

I'm going to close this out. This is yet another quality post I've come to expect from you; it's so good that I may run it on my blog. I might intersperse my commentary within the post, but it's good stuff nonetheless. Have a good night, HL...


Keoni Galt said...

I have no problem with you quoting or posting anything I write on this blog at all Mark. Feel free.

Also, I do agree with you about public schooling, the civil war and the 17th amendment all having a significant role in reaching the point that we are today...I don't think they are unrelated at all. The social engineers that are behind the transformation of the Representative Republic into the mob-rules Democracy we have now deliberately implemented every step of the dialectical process.

Changing the election of Senators into popular election, the institution of compulsory Public schooling and than universal suffrage where all steps taken slowly but surely over a long period of time to implement the vision of society they foisted on an unsuspecting America. Throw in the change in divorce laws and the creation of an extra-constitutional family court system, and we have the current decline of Western Civilization we must all now endure.

Anonymous said...

Another link for reference:

Anonymous said...

last night showed why we need to repeal the 19th amendment. women are applauding themselves for a health care bill that takes a way their right to choose and still forces them to pay more for health insurance.
in eight years what did hillary do to pass the ERA? nothing. the era's biggest proponent? a WOMAN.

WOMEN are what's ruining this country. It's time we take it back. Either that or stop giving them welfare to take care of kids they have with assholes who sell drugs.

Unknown said...

Sorry for being late to the party but this post was recommended to me and it was a fascinating read.

As a 30-something woman, I completely agree with what you're saying. Voting is simply not appropriate for women but it's hard to get that message over!

Anonymous said...

Daffy dames need protection from themselves and society in general has suffered greatly from freaky females being allowed to vote.

More advanced societies do not allow daffy dames to vote or sit on juries or harm others due to the inferior nature of female "logic."

It is time to curtail the horde of hussies so negatively affecting USA society

Anonymous said...


The late Andrea Dworkin was a feminist lunatic. But, unlike so many Jewish feminists, she was humorous in her stupidity. Dworkin could turn the truth upside down in a way that could only bring a smile to the lips. One of her most amazing displays of upside down think was a book called: “Scapegoat: The Jews, Israel and Women’s Liberation”. The thesis was that men have oppressed women the same way the Nazis scapegoated the Jews. This innovative nonsense suffers from all kinds of problems. First, the Nazis did not “scapegoat” the Jews, who were provably guilty of all the charges leveled against them. Neither did the Nazis kill six million Jews during the mythical Holocaust, using magical “gas chambers”. As to men “oppressing” women, men oppress women by working to support them, by giving them everything in divorce court, by giving them custody of the kids, by paying them child support and alimony, by dying to protect them and by going down with the ship so that women and children can climb on the life boats.

So just what is Andrea Dworkin talking about? Women actually oppress men the same way that the Jews once oppressed Europe and Russia with Communism and gulags. The Jewish commissars once murdered millions. Women rob men blind in divorce court, force men to give up the kids and pay child support plus alimony, expect men to go down with the ship and expect men to do the fighting and dying. Now women want all the jobs and political power too. This financial rape might have something to do with the violence against women Andrea Dworkin deplores, but she would never understand the connection any more than she would understand how Jewish tax farming and sex slave trading in Europe led to anti-Semitic pogroms against “scapegoated” Jews.

In short, Andrea Dworkin had it ass backwards. As noted, this was part of her charm. The late Andrea Dworkin never understood that woman is “the natural born Jew of the universe”. Just as Chosen Kikes promote pogroms through their odious behavior, Chosen Cunts provoke the same back lash for the same reasons. Andrea Dworkin spent most of her life thinking through her vagina. Had she written: “Woman: The Natural Born Jew of the Universe” instead of “Scapegoat: The Jews, Israel and Women’s Liberation”, she would have become the “Mein Cunt” of clear thinking feminism.

Anonymous said...

It is the creation of the federal reserve in 1913 and the 16th amendment which was created in 1909 that allowed for the government to grow like it did because in gave it access to an 'unlimited' supply of money. The federal reserve is especially bad because it inflates away the government's obligations by destroying the currency. Think of it as a ponzi scheme with a counterfeit machine.

Without these two laws, the government would have to live within it's means. The way to reverse this is to create an amendment that overturns the 16th amendment and bans central banking in the United States, as well to bring us back to the gold standard.

Anonymous said...

This is quite possibly the dumbest thing I have read today.