Saturday, June 25, 2011

Feminism is the Key to the UN's Agenda for the 21st Century

Too often, pointing the things I will discuss in this post results in swift dismissal as "conspiracy theory."

Problem is, at the highest echelons of the UN, there is no conspiracy theory. This is the Agenda for the 21st century, and the people responsible for implementing it's agenda are not even attempting to hide their plans.

Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment.

There is an agenda that they have planned for us all, and are in fact implementing it incrementally and gradually over the space of decades.

We are in the midst of it right now.

Just sit back and think for a often do you encounter the phrase "sustainable development" being used in TV shows, political ads, newspaper columns and reports, and political speeches and interviews by talking heads on the Tell-A-Vision?

This phrase is in popular use everywhere. In the past 5 years, I've travelled to many different US States on both the West and East Coasts, and have been to Australia and all across the UK. This phrase is in use everywhere I've been.

This is no accident.

It's part of the social engineering program being implemented by the education curriculum from grade school all the way through Ivy League University level, and is perpetually reinforced by the various organs of the Western world's mass media.

The primary feature of "sustainable development" is "population control."

Does this sound like fevered ravings of conspiracy theory lunacy?

Only if you consider Al Gore a raving lunatic.

"One of the things we could do about it is to change the technologies, to put out less of this pollution, to stabilize the population, and one of the principle ways of doing that is to empower and educate girls and women. You have to have ubiquitous availability of fertility management so women can choose how many children have, the spacing of the children.

You have to lift child survival rates so that parents feel comfortable having small families and most important – you have to educate girls and empower women. And that’s the most powerful leveraging factor, and when that happens, then the population begins to stabilize and societies begin to make better choices and more balanced choices."

Al Gore is not speaking of some theory...he's talking about using the social engineering program already effected in the West, and exporting it to the Third World to reduce their population growth. And while many folks will read that last paragraph and no doubt quip that "Yes, Al Gore is a raving lunatic" I would answer he is not crazy at all. He's simply promoting the official UN Agenda 21.

Look at Chapter 24 of Agenda 21:

(b) To increase the proportion of women decision makers, planners, technical advisers, managers and extension workers in environment and development fields;

Of course, the more Women decision makers in Government and business, the less women are at home breeding undesirable population growth.

(c) To consider developing and issuing by the year 2000 a strategy of changes necessary to eliminate constitutional, legal, administrative, cultural, behavioural, social and economic obstacles to women's full participation in sustainable development and in public life;

Eleven years later, it's safe to say this has been accomplished entirely in the West...which is why we are now in the "export to the 3rd world" phase.

(d) To establish by the year 1995 mechanisms at the national, regional and international levels to assess the implementation and impact of development and environment policies and programmes on women and to ensure their contributions and benefits;

(e) To assess, review, revise and implement, where appropriate, curricula and other educational material, with a view to promoting the dissemination to both men and women of gender-relevant knowledge and valuation of women's roles through formal and non-formal education, as well as through training institutions, in collaboration with non-governmental organizations;

(f) To formulate and implement clear governmental policies and national guidelines, strategies and plans for the achievement of equality in all aspects of society, including the promotion of women's literacy, education, training, nutrition and health and their participation in key decision-making positions and in management of the environment, particularly as it pertains to their access to resources, by facilitating better access to all forms of credit, particularly in the informal sector, taking measures towards ensuring women's access to property rights as well as agricultural inputs and implements;

(g) To implement, as a matter of urgency, in accordance with country-specific conditions, measures to ensure that women and men have the same right to decide freely and responsibly the number and spacing of their children and have access to information, education and means, as appropriate, to enable them to exercise this right in keeping with their freedom, dignity and personally held values;

Recall Al Gore: "one of the principle ways of doing that is to empower and educate girls and women." This is the primary impetus behind sections d though g. Getting the womynz educated and in the workforce is THE best way to institute population control for sustainable development.

(h) To consider adopting, strengthening and enforcing legislation prohibiting violence against women and to take all necessary administrative, social and educational measures to eliminate violence against women in all its forms.

In other words, to set up Western styled family court systems that empower women (by dis-empowering men) in traditionally Patriarchal societies. It's the same old playbook already run successfully in the West. Violence against women is the ultimate red herring. Afterall, what normal thinking, civilized person would be "FOR" violence against women? But the real agenda, as we now see it in full effect in the West, is Violence (BY THE STATE) against Men.

Agenda 21 is quite clear in it's goals and aims. It's not a conspiracy theory...but realized FACT.

Women in the West have been empowered, and overwhelmingly "educated" and the desired reduction in population growth already well underway. The program has been an overwhelming success, and it's time to export it to the rest of the world.

This is the true Agenda of the feminist movement. To get women to voluntarily believe and internalize a value system in which they actively want to pursue education and career instead of marriage and kids.

This is also why we are constantly bombarded in the mainstream mass media with stories of women's oppression in the Third World as justification for our continued fiat wars on foreign shores.

"Women are not even allowed to go to school!"

That's because they're at home with their mother's learning their cultural traditions which involve being a wife and mother to a large family...this cultural tradition is simply NOT sustainable to the planners of the 21st century agenda.

This is the primary reason why Hillary Clinton is the Secretary of the Feminist State...she is the foremost proponent of using the US military industrial complex to export feminism to the Middle East and Africa.

Time to empower women on a global scale to reduce the population and implement "sustainable development."

Are we all on board with the Agenda?


Anonymous said...

Good article bro.

You summarized what is going on in the world perfectly.

It just amazes me that people still call us conspiracy theorists, when the facts are right out in the open for everyone to see.

The control freak parasites can't stand competition to their wealth and control, so like little sore losers in school they are throwing hissy fits and are trying to keep everyone else down with these policies.

People need to wake up and realize what is really going on in the world. Just follow the money and control trail and you shall get all your answers.

Wish I had the time to continue posting on my blog, but I started a new job 7 months ago, at a large pharmaceutical company (boy do I have stories).


Anonymous said...

The Georgia Guidestones is a large granite monument in Elbert County, Georgia, USA. A message comprising ten guides is inscribed on the structure in eight modern languages, and a shorter message is inscribed at the top of the structure in four ancient languages' scripts: Babylonian, Classical Greek, Sanskrit, and Egyptian hieroglyphs.

A message consisting of a set of ten guidelines or principles is engraved on the Georgia Guidestones in eight different languages, one language on each face of the four large upright stones. Moving clockwise around the structure from due north, these languages are: English, Spanish, Swahili, Hindi, Hebrew, Arabic, Chinese, and Russian.

1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. 2. Guide reproduction wisely —improving fitness and diversity. 3. Unite humanity with a living new language. 4. Rule passion —faith —tradition —and all things with tempered reason. 5. Protect people and nations with fair laws andd just courts. 6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court. 7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials. 8. Balance personal rights with social duties. 9. Prize truth —beauty —love —seeking harmony with the infinite. 10. Be not a cancer on the earth —Leave room for nature —Leave room for nature.

Anonymous said...

It will not be long before the MRA blogs will be targeted as a form of violence against women. Pointing out the truth of womens nature and the system that is playing them against men will not be allowed to continue.

CorkyAgain said...

It reminds me of something my ex-wife used to say to our children: "This isn't something you get to decide."

Now I'm wondering where she learned that. She always was one who echoed the party line, and rarely had an original thought of her own.

Our betters have decided this for us, and we're not being given any choice except to comply.

Elliott said...

Here's my question for the U.N.'s brilliant social planners: what happens when the "backward" Muslims, who have thus far resisted all efforts at Western-style feminization and who have migrated to Europe in huge numbers, outbreed your ilk in their own countries?

Anonymous said...

I've been saying this shit for years.

This is all part of the U.N. plan to control the world's food.

See, their egghead scientists came up with the idea there won't be enough of it to go around at current rates of population growth, so these assholes are treating us like farm animals,practicing eugenics on us, and are going to make a grab for the food and farmland, which will eventually be worth its weight in gold.

Anonymous said...

They are in it, big corporations aknowledge that, they have already created and fund "islamic feminism".
Not sure they will succes in time for their porposes.


Anonymous said...

Yeah, reducing birthrates in order to halt population growth... so damn evil and without any common sense...


This lunacy is the very point where I lose sight at the manosphere and MRA community: their return to a world with 7-children per woman so they are so damn occupied to think about cheating or equality is an irrational, near childish wish that won't ever materialize.

Good luck putting your plan into fruition. Keep thinking, just as economists say, that if hard drives double their capacity each two years then it's also possible to double food production each two years.

Meanwhile, enjoy your healthy natural food while you can. Human numbers are so high that even the healthy paleodiet is now seen as selfish luxury and meat is condemned as the crime against the third world birthers that want us to gloat on grain.

True, malthusian societies are bound to be replaced by child-pumping ones but ONLY IF THEY REMAIN PASSIVE. In order to exist, malthusian can't have the luxury of tolerance, and they should be grabbing the weapons against the many.

It is sad having to struggle so hard in order to pick a side between hate-promoting feminism and lunacy-driven men's movement. That said, I'll have to pick feminism. Reality is on their side.

Keoni Galt said...

Yeah, reducing birthrates in order to halt population growth... so damn evil and without any common sense...



The point is that there is a subversive social engineering agenda being implemented that misleads people into lives of unfulfilled happiness...just to suit the population control agenda of the globalists.

So who gets to decide who is "worthy of reproduction" and who "needs to be controlled?"

I'd rather make such decisions for myself and not let some elitist who thinks I and my family are nothing more than cattle to be herded and harvested for profit controlling my reproductive choice.