Wednesday, June 6, 2012

The Tyranny of Usury

I read the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion quite some time ago, but never really blogged about them before, mostly to avoid being labelled an "anti-semite." Ah well, since I've already crossed the Jewbicon...

Consider the following from the infamous "forgery,"  Protocol 20 -

What also indeed is, in substance, a loan, especially a foreign loan? A loan is - an issue of government bills of exchange containing a percentage obligation commensurate to the sum of the loan capital. If the loan bears a charge of 5 per cent, then in twenty years the State vainly pays away in interest a sum equal to the loan borrowed, in forty years it is paying a double sum, in sixty - treble, and all the while the debt remains an unpaid debt.
From this calculation it is obvious that with any form of taxation per head the State is baling out the last coppers of the poor taxpayers in order to settle accounts with wealthy foreigners, from whom it has borrowed money instead of collecting these coppers for its own needs without the additional interest.
Now were these preceding paragraphs really a forgery? Does it matter? They sure seem to accurately account for the current state of all Western Nation's that have Central Banks in charge of their monetary policies. To reiterate the primary protocol:

"...the State vainly pays away in interest a sum equal to the loan borrowed, in forty years it is paying a double sum, in sixty - treble, and all the while the debt remains an unpaid debt." 

Forgery? Really?
How much is our National Debt Service? Stated another way, how much is the interest on the United States’ National Debt? In the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, the interest on the national debt was $383 billion, making Interest Expense one of the largest components of the federal budget. In fact, interest on the national debt accounted for over 27% of our 2009 federal budget deficit. That’s a lot of “National Debt Service”, but it could have been much worse.

3 years later, it certainly has become much worse.

Here are some questions to consider:

Who's the top owner of US debt? The Federal Reserve.

Who owns the Federal Reserve? According to researcher and writer Dean Henderson,

My queries to bank regulatory agencies regarding stock ownership in the top 25 US bank holding companies were given Freedom of Information Act status, before being denied on “national security” grounds. This is rather ironic, since many of the bank’s stockholders reside in Europe. One important repository for the wealth of the global oligarchy that owns these bank holding companies is US Trust Corporation – founded in 1853 and now owned by Bank of America. A recent US Trust Corporate Director and Honorary Trustee was Walter Rothschild. Other directors included Daniel Davison of JP Morgan Chase, Richard Tucker of Exxon Mobil, Daniel Roberts of Citigroup and Marshall Schwartz of Morgan Stanley. [2]
J. W. McCallister, an oil industry insider with House of Saud connections, wrote in The Grim Reaper that information he acquired from Saudi bankers cited 80% ownership of the New York Federal Reserve Bank- by far the most powerful Fed branch- by just eight families, four of which reside in the US. They are the Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Lehmans and Kuhn Loebs of New York; the Rothschilds of Paris and London; the Warburgs of Hamburg; the Lazards of Paris; and the Israel Moses Seifs of Rome.
CPA Thomas D. Schauf corroborates McCallister’s claims, adding that ten banks control all twelve Federal Reserve Bank branches. He names N.M. Rothschild of London, Rothschild Bank of Berlin, Warburg Bank of Hamburg, Warburg Bank of Amsterdam, Lehman Brothers of New York, Lazard Brothers of Paris, Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York, Israel Moses Seif Bank of Italy, Goldman Sachs of New York and JP Morgan Chase Bank of New York. Schauf lists William Rockefeller, Paul Warburg, Jacob Schiff and James Stillman as individuals who own large shares of the Fed. [3] The Schiffs are insiders at Kuhn Loeb. The Stillmans are Citigroup insiders, who married into the Rockefeller clan at the turn of the century.
Eustace Mullins came to the same conclusions in his book The Secrets of the Federal Reserve, in which he displays charts connecting the Fed and its member banks to the families of Rothschild, Warburg, Rockefeller and the others. [4] The control that these banking families exert over the global economy cannot be overstated and is quite intentionally shrouded in secrecy. Their corporate media arm is quick to discredit any information exposing this private central banking cartel as “conspiracy theory”. Yet the facts remain.

Yes, the facts remain. The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion have turned out to actually be The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Rothschild.

Here's the famous quote of the man who's portrait graces this post: "Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws."

 Mayer Amschel Rothschild

He was the founder of the Rothschild family international banking dynasty that became the most successful business family in history. In 2005, he was ranked 7th on the Forbes magazine list of "The Twenty Most Influential Businessmen Of All Time". The business magazine referred to him as a "founding father of international finance".[1]

Thanks to a narrative promulgated by the corporate mass media, merely mentioning the name "Rothschild" or "Rockefeller" means anything you are discussing is automatically discredited as "crazy conspiracy theory."

Yet the facts remain.


FNG said...

Once again, thank you, thank you, thank you. Keep the lights on.

Anonymous said...

You didn't just cross the Jewbicon. You are rushing across it with an entire army!

dicipres said...

Link to site:
Oh man, what can I say... be a Nazi if you feel like it. Today the 'elders of Zion' have a place to run to if the hate start to boil again.

I do have two points to make:

1. Although the political/financial power held by Jews in America is in its peak, the Jewish identity in general and American Jews in particular are disappearing rapidly and integrating into the Christian population. This actually happens due to lack of anti-Semitism, lack of a common threat to unite the 'tribe'. Ironically, some anti-Semitism is good to the Jews and anti-Semitism actually feeds the Jewish identity. I can also see this in myself, I actually only 'feel' Jewish if there are anti-Semites around.

2. I am not the liberal "race is a social construct" guy. Statistical correlations exist and can be used to draw various conclusions regarding race (and specifically large number of people of the same race) etc. However, your use of the "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" is without merit, since there is no proof they were even written by Jews or accepted by Jews. These "Protocols" only present the tenets of anti-Semitism.

3. If you somehow eliminate all the Jewish bankers in the whole world others will just take their place. Greed is not a vice limited to Jews. Greedy people with similar personalities will be attracted to these newly open positions and, unless the rules/system is changed, the final result will be similar.

dicipres said...

Sorry about the link and it should be three points not "two points".

Anonymous said...

@ dicipres: Do you really think Rosthchilds etc give a shit about the rest of the jews? They funded the Nazis during WW2.

Anonymous said...

If it is always the case that "the debt remains an unpaid debt", how is it that mortgages can ever be paid off? This is a question of political will and not economics. To develop a mortgage repayment scheme, may I suggest Kellison's "Theory of Interest" or Borverman's "Mathematics of Investment and Credit".

And while we're at it, there were plenty of non-Jewish bankers in Western history. For example the Fugger banking house was one of the largest in Europe during the 16th century, until it was wrecked after three defaults of the King of Spain.

. said...

Dammit, you know I can't talk about juice. And you keep writing about it!

Keoni Galt said...

However, your use of the "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" is without merit, since there is no proof they were even written by Jews or accepted by Jews.

I do not cite the PEOZ to "prove" the "Jews" are responsible or liable or guilty of anything.

Seriously, some of my best friends are Jews. LOL

However, Jews like the Rothschilds have certainly used the perception of Jews as the most unjustly persecuted people in world history as a cover.

And if you actually read the POEZ, you quickly understand that it's really not about promoting anti-semitism, but rather understanding the mindset of the ruling elite.

Substitute the word "Gyoim" with "Sheeple" and you see precisely how we, the Proletariat of the Brave New World Order are just "cattle" to the elite powerbrokers and oppressors of all humanity.

Keoni Galt said...

Rob - LOL, I used to drink Juice all the time. Now, I can't stand the taste of it anymore!

Ecclesiastes said...

There is a serious problem with this pedestrian analysis: the confusion of money and currency, of value and the measure of value.

When a man borrows, or a man lends, currency, it is assumed that neither can change the value of the currency. Between sovereign nations, that isn't so, and the only kind of consequence that prevents this kind of swindle is political.

To draw communist China into the WTO, the US agreed to a fixed rate of exchange between the Yen and the Dollar for 10 years. No sooner than the plates on the printing machine could be changed, China created a new entirely internal currency. Voila'! The communist nation could take full advantage of the fixed rate of exchange in import and export while inflating away all of the value to its ... citizens, I suppose we are to call them.

Justin said...

Interesting news in light of your post, have you seen it?

icr said...

1. Although the political/financial power held by Jews in America is in its peak, the Jewish identity in general and American Jews in particular are disappearing rapidly and integrating into the Christian population.

"The Christian population" of the US has become little more than atomized secular hedonist devotees of consumer culture and PC pseudo-Christianity. Only the dumbest Jews want to assimilate into THAT.

Anonymous said...

the international banksters are the enemy of all free people.

Unknown said...

^^Under the Sign of the Scorpion is available for free online here:

It serves as an excellent case study of what happens when the Zionists' power is virtually unchecked.

Unknown said...

Speaking of the Protocols (discovered in Russia), why was a copy of the Protocols deposited with the bodies of Tsar Nicholas II and his family when they were shot in Yekaterinburg after the commencement of the "Russian" October Revolution? (A quote by Jewish poet Heinrich Heine, "Belsatzar [sic: the poem originally said Belzazer] ward in selbiger Nacht /
von seinen Knechten umgebracht." (Belsatsar was murdered by his slaves on the same night, an allusion to "Mene, mene, tekel upharsin" in Daniel 5:30, which meant among other things that Belshazzar's kingdom was divided and given to the Medes and Persians who returned the Jewish exiles to Israel... just as the USSR supported the establishment of Israel in '48?)

Do a little digging into this murder, and you will find that the operation "Tvjordy Znak" was headed by Jew Yankel [not even a Russian name!] Yuroffsky (a member of the Jewish-dominated secret police called the ChEKA. As a rich dealer in jewels, he wasn't terribly proletarian, though virtually no revolutionaries were). "Alexander Beloborodov" (real name: Yankel Weisbart, son of Isidor Weisbart), leader in the Yekaterinburg Soviet (совет is the Russian translation of the Hebrew word "Kahal", which is used to describe the ruling Zionist council), was responsible for holding the family captive. The others involved were Andreas Vergasi, Laszlo Horvath, Victor Griinfeldt, Imre Nagy, Emile Fekete, Anselm Fischer,Piotr Yermakov, Piotr Medvedyev,
S. Vaganov, and Isidor Edelstein (most of these were Jewish).

But why did the execution of the Tsar and his family have such a Zionist character? Because both Revolutions of 1917 were Zionist dominated (as was the abortive revolution of 1905, as were the 20,000 deadly terrorist attacks that wracked Russia in the late 19th century), the various terrors that consumed untold millions of Russians and others were ordered and implemented predominately by Jews (who comprised only 5% of Imperial Russia's population in 1917), the Soviet state was financed largely by Jewish bankers (who enjoyed incredible returns on their investment from stolen valuables), we conclude that the "Russian" Revolution was a giant Zionist ritual sacrifice.

For more info, I commend Under the Sign of the Scorpion by Jueri Lina. While the Jewish nature of the Revolution can be easily established from honest mainstream sources (which Lina also uses) whilst Masonic and corporatist involvements therein have already been exposed by Sutton, Webster, &al., the genius of his work lies in its use of declassified Soviet documents that expose the 1950s attempts at concealing the Jewish domination of all things Soviet.

Keoni Galt said...

Justin - Yes I have, Thanks.

Rebellious - sorry your comment got caught by the spam filter.

Very interesting.