Monday, March 8, 2010

The Hidden Picture Within the Picture

We believe the picture painters of the mass media are artfully creating landscapes for us which deliberately hide the real picture. - Gary Allen & Larry Abraham

In a moment of circumspection while commuting amongst the rat race of a typical morning Hawaiian-style traffic jam, I attempted to assess the length and breadth of the intellectual journey I've undertaken in these last few years. What began as a curious search on the internet in trying to find an explanation for the seemingly illegal and unjust way in which my Uncle's ex-wife utterly screwed him over in divorce court, has turned into a complete re-orientation of my point of view of this world and my way of life in it.

This great unraveling of the lies, misinformation, propaganda and indoctrination that had been constructed in my mind by the various influences of institutional and cultural shaping is almost overwhelming when I try to grasp the sheer magnitude of what has been done to we, the peoples of the 21st Century.

The most difficult thing to do when it comes to "unplugging" from the matrix of our BraveNewWorldOrder has been avoiding becoming the 'crazy' guy trying to warn everyone else. It's one thing to discuss these things in the relative comfort of internet anonymity...quite another discussing such things with people in real life.

I've learned to simply avoid direct confrontation with people. Rather, I try to take a subtle, Devil's advocate approach to undermining deceptions and lies whenever I encounter them in real life. This usually means contradicting the conventional wisdom that encompasses dietary guidelines, the grand charade of dialectical political theater, mass media indoctrination, and of course, gender roles.

Often times, it feels rather discouraging when you can actually get someone to agree with you on one of these topics, or another...but the minute you try to share your insight the grand, overarching movement to tie it all together, well THAT'S when you become the crazy guy donning the tinfoil hat and hiding from the black helicopters. The proliferation of dis- and mis- information is so ubiquitous, that I think it's easy for people to simply shut down their critical thinking capacity as soon as their "fantastic theory" meter hits overload.

So I've come to the point where I wanted to find more corroboration to the views I've already formulated in my mind. What sources exist out there for which I could point people towards so they can ascertain themselves whether or not "conspiracy theory" is based on reality or insanity? In seeking such sources, I've come across three books that have recently become available as free pdf downloads...three books that were all written decades ago, yet who's content is as timely as ever.

In terms of the Masculine-focused blogosphere, many people have gone to great lengths to reveal the ties between the feminist movement and it's ties to communism. The evidence making this connection is rather overwhelming and quite easy to establish. Most MRA bloggers and commentariat are familiar with these arguments.

But it doesn't end there. Who was really behind the Communist movement? How where they able to effect this long march through Western culture? This is what initially led me to the New World Order conspiracy theory sphere of the internet.

If you dig deep enough into the roots of feminism in the West, you will find that the connections between the Rockefeller Foundation is THE money behind all of the grants, studies, legislative movements, political campaigns with regards to feminism, population control and abortion, as well as the entire Women's Studies college curriculum that is now established on 98% of the Western World's Academic institutions.

As Henry Makow pointed out: If you search "Rockefeller Foundation" and "Women's Studies" in Google, you will get over 19000 entries.

Just who or what exactly is the Rockefeller Foundation? Wonder no more...I've just discovered a free, online version of The Rockefeller Files. Keep in mind that this book was published back in 1975, when you consider this quote from Chapter Ten, The People Planners. Consider how many aspects of this "vision" have already come to pass:

In our dreams we have limitless resources and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hands."Now, thanks to the taxpayers, the Rockefellers have almost limitless funds. As a result, faceless bureaucrats in Washington whom you did not hire and whom you cannot fire - now tell you how to run your business, whom you may hire, where your children will be bussed to school, what products you can purchase, and even what foods you can and cannot eat. It is only a matter of time until the dictocrats tell you how many children you are permitted to have. - Fred Gates, aide to John D. Rockefeller

Now, when you research the Rockefellers and their vision of a New World Order, you will invariably come up with another institution that the Rockefeller's founded: The Council of Foreign Relations.

From Obama & The CFR:

Established in the 1920's and headquartered in New York, its membership includes prominent politicians and business elite, including heads of academia and media. The organization seeks to centralize both political power and market power to craft legislation outside the checks and balances of democracy. The CFR is rarely mentioned by the mainstream media, making it difficult to fully gauge its influence. When it is mentioned in the press, it is likely whitewashed as trivial or irrelevant. Notable members of the CFR include: John Rockefeller, David Rockefeller, Nelson Rockefeller, Dick Cheney, John Kerry, Bill Clinton, Al Gore, Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush, Gerald Ford, Richard Nixon, Condolezza Rice, Paul Wolfowitz, Alan Greenspan, Colin Powell, Henry Kissinger & Angelina Jolie (Yes, the actress has a five year term membership as an ambassador).

Its membership list is a who's who of Washington and Wall St. elite going back nearly a
century. It should not be surprising that most presidential candidates in the 2008 election are CFR members. Candidates do not advertise their CFR membership to the public. They pose as
“liberals” and “conservatives” to control all aspects of the debate. The CFR has stacked the deck for the 2008 election with several members in the race from both sides of the isle:

Democrat CFR Candidates: Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, Chris Dodd & Bill Richardson

Republican CFR Candidates: Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani, John McCain, Fred Thompson, & Newt Gingrich.

The mainstream media's self-proclaimed “top tier” candidates are united in their CFR membership, while an unwitting public perceives political diversity. The unwitting public has been conditioned to instinctively deny such a mass deception could ever be hidden in plain view. Presidential Candidate & Congressman Ron Paul is the only “top tier” candidate who is not a member of the CFR.

When people are informed of the CFR and how most Republican and Democrat politicians on the National Stage are members of it, they often ignore the CFR is some meaningless politician's club or debating society. But consider the words of a CFR insider, Carroll Quigley:

The goals of the CFR is best described by its very own members. Bill Clinton's Georgetown mentor and CFR member Carroll Quigley states: “The Council on Foreign Relations is the American branch of a society which originated in England... (and) ...believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one world rule established.”. Quigley differs from many of his CFR colleagues in that he believes their plan for a new world order should be more publicly disclosed. In his book Tragedy and Hope, Quigley concedes he is unique among his peers in that he believes the new world order plan of global government's “role in history is significant enough to be known”. Quigley also admits that the two-party system allows for both groups to be controlled at the highest level but operate like bitter rivals. As Quigley says, this gives the voters the chance to “throw the rascals out at any election without leading to any profound of extreme shifts in policy.”. Controlling Washington elite allowed private central banks to “dominate the political system... ...and economy of world as a whole” and implement a new system of “feudalist fashion” through “secret agreements”. Although he believes the CFR's intentions should be more public, Quigley understands the average person doesn't understand feudalism or serfdom and will never read his book.

Quigley himself also authored a book entitled Tragedy and Hope, an extensive history interspersed with startling information about the secret organizations behind the impact on almost every major event of modern history. (Note: the link goes to a 1090 paged pdf document. It may take awhile to download it in it's entirety.)

Quigley's tome has often been cited for it's candid admissions of the elite power structure intent on implementing their New World Order, but today is the first time I was able to find a complete, free pdf file of the book online.

The final book, another that I have just discovered a free pdf file of online, is one I have yet to read...but have heard a lot about: None Dare Call It a Conspiracy

The first paragraph of the book (which also contains the opening quote for this post) has already got me intrigued...

Most of us have had the experience, either as parents or youngsters, of trying to discover the "hidden picture' within another picture in a children's magazine. Usually you are shown a landscape with trees, bushes, flowers and other bits of nature. The caption reads something like this: "Concealed somewhere in this picture is a donkey pulling a cart with a boy in it. Can you find them?" Try as you might, usually you could not find the hidden picture until you turned to a page farther back in the magazine which would reveal how cleverly the artist had hidden it from us. If we study the landscape we realize that the whole picture was painted in such a way as to conceal the real picture within, and once we see the "real picture," it stands out like the proverbial painful digit.

We believe the picture painters of the mass media are artfully creating landscapes for us which deliberately hide the real picture. In this book we will show you how to discover the "hidden picture" in the landscapes presented to us daily through newspapers, radio and. television. Once you can see through the camouflage, you will see the donkey, the cart and the boy who have been there all along.

Though I've just begun reading, I believe I can already see this picture that has been there all along.

Perhaps you too will read these books and see the hidden pictures for yourself.


magogici said...

I can't remember who said this but it goes something like this.

"I prophesy to keep myself sane".

Don't worry dude, speaking the truth has never caused anyone to go crazy.

It's the people who lie all the time that go nuts.

Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Tech said...

How where they able to effect this long march through Western culture?

Determination and a plan, that's all. No conspiracy needed.

It is only a matter of time until the dictocrats tell you how many children you are permitted to have.

I'm sure they will try. I'm not sure how this is worse than anything else the government should not be doing.

Also, if it ever happens given the way things are they will be telling you to have more kids not less.

The Council of Foreign Relations

The CFR doesn't even work like that. Their membership has a bunch of nobodies too. The CFR doesn't even have a single position on any issue. Don't take my word for it. The membership process for the CFR is pretty straightforward and not difficult at all.

Aaron said...

As Tech says, no conspiracy (a plan made in secret) is needed. Sure, some secret stuff goes on, like Soviet spies infiltrating the US government and the Vatican, but most of our rush to socialism and tyranny has been right out in the open, and we the voters have done it to ourselves. The US didn't have a violent socialist revolution in the early 1930s because it didn't need one: we voted in socialism via FDR and others. Except for a couple minor exceptions like Coolidge and Reagan, that's the direction we've been pushing things since the ink dried on the Constitution. Even now, most people want nationalized health care; they just want to be sure someone else will pay for it.

If it were a conspiracy, it wouldn't be so easy to see its tracks. For instance, you can read the words of the people who started the first public schools and see exactly what their purpose was: indoctrinating potentially subversive elements with right-minded thinking. No conspiracy; they were quite open about it. Another example: Rahm Emmanuel came right out and said the administration would be using the financial crisis to push through plans the people wouldn't normally stand for. Again, nothing secret about that.

People like Clinton, Obama, and Bush don't need to have secret meetings to decide to nationalize industries or push for mass sterilization, any more than Catholics need to have a meeting to decide that a crucifix hanging upside down in urine isn't art. They just know, because they share the same viewpoint about it.

Maybe we need a new word to describe what we're talking about here: a plan to push a society in a dangerous direction, planned and implemented right out in the open, with much of that society's blessing.

Keoni Galt said...

PMAFT and Aaron - I don't think we need to really get into an argument over the semantics of the definition of "conspiracy."

The thing about all of this is that none of this was ever done "in secret." A "conspiracy" does not necessarily have to be "in secret."

In many cases, many of the people that have effected these vast changes did so quiet openly.

Anonymous said...

"The government, which was designed for the people, has got into the hands of the bosses and their employers, the special interests. An invisible empire has been set up above the forms of democracy."
Woodrow Wilson 28th President of the United States

"Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the US, in the field of commerce and manufacture,
are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive,
that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it."
Woodrow Wilson 28th President of the United States

"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwillingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated in the hands of a few men."
Woodrow Wilson 28th President of the United States

Keoni Galt said...

Excellent quotes, Anon. I believe Woodrow was deceived and used by "Colonel" House and all of the "conspirators" who put their plans into motion on Jekyll Island back in 1913.

Anonymous said...

It's hard to see why anyone would actually want a one world government - and that includes those at the top.

We all know what happens whenever a monopoly of any kind is established: quality declines; price sky-rockets; lethargy and inefficiencies multiply; the monopoly degenerates, needing more and more artificial supports and regulations preventing competition; and finally, it collapses.

It's the same pattern for anything on this Earth.

And it's the reason why nature always plays the numbers game. As soon as one thing fails, there's something else ready to succeed in its place.

Anyone planning for a one world government is setting all of us up for a fall - and there's no reason to suppose that the top dogs will fare any better than the minions when that fall comes. The course of history runs right over the bodies of the over-ambitious.

Of course, you are right - there are people who have these desires and are actively working on them. There are others who are actively working to stymie them. And there are others lying on a beach in Antigua, sucking a cool beer and celebrating their happy life.

Anonymous said...

Anon, a monopoly is great for the guy at the top, and it sucks for everyone else. You think a guy like Soros is going to care that quality of government will decline, price of govt services will rise, lethargy and inefficiency will increase, and so forth, under a one world govt? Hell no. He'll even be insulated from whatever collapse happens. All the bad things will happen to peons like you and me, while he and the rest of the Illuminati are clinking champagne glasses.

Anonymous said...

"This great unraveling of the lies, misinformation, [false flags,] propaganda and indoctrination that had been constructed in my mind by the various influences of institutional and cultural shaping is almost overwhelming when I try to grasp the sheer magnitude of what has been done to we, the peoples of the 21st Century."

Great line. The only thing I would add is what I put in parenthesis above. It was the 'couldn't fool a 5 yr old' blatantly obvious controlled demolition of the twin towers that was the beginning of the awakening for me.

And what a journey it's been. The deeper you dig the more shit you uncover and the more you realize you don't know.

I often find it very difficult to balance my intense desire for truth with my equally intense desire to enjoy life to the fullest.

Then again, I'm not sure one is really possible without the other.

Thanks for the links.