The World's "First" Multicultural Society? Not quite... |
And as he stood there in the late afternoon, in the heart of Honolulu, watching the varied people of the island go past, he had a faint glimmer of the ultimate brotherhood in which the world must one day live: Koreans went by in amity with Japanese whom in their homeland they hated, while Japanese accepted Chinese, and Filipinos accepted both, a thing unheard of in the Phillipines. A Negro passed by and many handsome Hawaiians whose blood was mixed with that of China or Portugal or Puerto Rico. It was a strange, new breed of men Congressman Carter saw, and grudgingly an idea came to him: "Maybe they've got something. Maybe I wasted my time living in the big houses of the white people. Maybe this is the pattern of the future."
- From the book "Hawaii" by James Michener
Michener's historical-fiction novel, Hawaii, was published in 1959, the same year Hawaii officially became the 50th franchise of USA Inc. It is fitting that Michener ended his epic with an ode to the emergence of the new "golden man" of Hawaii's 20th century melting pot of mass miscegenation and Americanization, since that year marked the fruition of over a century of effort by the business and military interests who worked ceaselessly to overthrow Hawaii's monarchy and status as a sovereign, independent nation.
As a young college student working on a Bachelor's degree at the University of Hawaii, I was a Hawaiian history buff that took as many Hawaiian Studies courses as I could to fulfill my elective requirements. To those familiar with the literature, you will recognize the most prominent names of the authoritative books of Hawaiian history that I have collected and studied over the years - Malo, Kamakau, Fornander, Elbert, Mahoe, Pukui, and Desha, amongst others. The collection of books formed the bulk of my studies as an eager student of the Hawaiian Studies program at the UH. I was primarily focused on the study Hawaiian cultural practices (like marriage customs), religion and history of the people of antiquity. I was inspired to discover the roots of the native part of my indigenous heritage and learn of the practices, beliefs and worldview of a culture that is on the edge of extinction in our modern age.
But the literature focused on Hawaiian antiquity was only part of the coursework of the Hawaiian studies program. A large portion of the curriculum also included study of Hawaii's transition to the modern day, and the history of the Hawaiian monarchy and the upheaval of culture and religious beliefs and eventual overthrow of the Monarchy and eventual induction as the 50th State of USA Inc.
At the time, I was not very interested in this aspect of the Hawaiian Studies coursework, for at that time in my life, I was also a patriotic Americanized neo-con warmonger, imbibing the right wing kool aid to wash down the MMPCP I was taking on a daily basis. At that time, I thought the Republican party and the conservative outlets of the mass media were my friend and ally, while the left wing Democrats and left-wing mainstream media where my enemy. Now I know better.
With my worldview under the influence of such intoxicating substances, I viewed my angry Hawaiian Studies professors as the equivalent manifestations of the left-wing, socialist-progressive minority grievance-mongers like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. Much of the class lectures and discussions were focused on anti-Americanism and urging we Hawaiian Studies students to become $ocial justice warriors. Many of the lectures and discussions were also infused with the progressive, left-wing, regularly scheduled programming of our Brave New World Order - feminism, environmentalism, collectivism and socialism.
In hindsight, I now realize exactly why Hawaiian Studies was thoroughly infused with the Cultural Marxist's regularly scheduled programming...it's one of the integral features of any and every school and course of study at any State University in USA Inc., since the mass-media and public education curriculum-driven cultural revolution of the 1960's.
While I could understand my professor's anger and desire to de-colonize Hawaii from the imperial American occupation, I also thought that it was unrealistic fantasy and a waste of time and energy to follow the path of the angry Hawaiian Sovereignty Activists so many of my fellow Hawaiian Studies students took.
Besides, several of my Hawaiian ancestors of the 20th century served with honor in the US military, and fought for our country and came home as proud American veterans who did their part to fight for "Freedum, Duhmockrusee and teh 'Murican way!"
It was for their sake that I was often deeply offended by the anti-American diatribes my Hawaiian Studies professors frequently voiced in my classes, though I held my tongue and never spoke up about my oppositional attitude. I was their to learn about my cultural heritage of my ancestors before Western contact, not concern myself with modern political activism.
While a student working on my Bachelor's degree and indulging in as many elective Hawaiian Studies classes as I could to satisfy my elective requirements, I intently studied Hawaiian history of antiquity while only dedicating minimal effort and attention to the 18th and 19th century Hawaiian history, which was the period of vast cultural change and social upheaval and eventual assimilation into the modern zeitgeist of pan-globalization.
Now that I've got my Master's Degree in Politically Incorrect History and Political Science of Globalized Conspiracy from the University of the Autodidact, I have since begun a review of my Hawaiian History books focused on that period of immense cultural change and upheaval...this time with a much different perspective than my formerly brainwashed youth. Many things that were a big mystery when I first read the histories have now been laid bare for me, and I now see these things from a much more lucid and clearer perspective.
As I've come to accept the idea that the conspiracy to effect a Brave New World Order of globalized tyranny of Orwellian proportions is factual and imminent, I've also been able to analyze the playbook THEY have been using for centuries to achieve their satanic goals of global domination. First and foremost, THEY gain their power by gaining control of the government with their primary weapon of usury.
Once their influence is gained by usury, THEY always implement their next move of their social engineering playbook - forced miscegenation to change the cultural zeitgeist of the nation they enslaved with usury, to effect a new ethos of globalized ethnic and cultural homogenization - aka the "pattern of the future" Michener referenced back in 1959.
The subtitle to the TIME magazine cover at the top of this post states - "How Immigrants Are Shaping the World's First Multicultural Society" couldn't be more wrong. Long before the invasion of the impoverished peasantry from Central and South America to the Northern Latitudes of USA Inc. occurred, the Kingdom of Hawaii had already long undergone the exact same process. THEY, the financiers of the sugar plantation owners, where behind the influence on the Hawaiian monarchy beholden to them by usurious debt, to import boatloads of immigrants from all over the world to work for indentured serf wages in the sugar cane fields all over the islands.
The color of the skin of these miscegenation operations are contextual...based solely on the nation-state targeted for assimilation into the Brave New World Order Borg. At the moment, THEY seek to dilute the white skin majority of Western Civilization here in the 21st century. But in 19th century Hawaii, the situation was the exact opposite. THEY sought to inundate Hawaii with a panoply of different races and cultures so as to dilute the Native Hawaiian brownskin stock, in order to cement the disenfranchisement of the native Polynesian of his rightful inheritance to the land.
In short, THEY want the teeming masses of humanity to interbreed over consecutive generations to create a mishmash-melange of ethnic people without a solid cultural identity or national pride in a nation-state homeland.
Who are THEY that I refer to? Why the same THEY we recognize today - the banksters. The "elite." The "owners of society." As I noted earlier, I have begun reviewing my collection of Hawaiian history, with a particular focus on the transition of the Kingdom of Hawaii to the modern state of colonized incorporation into our Brave New World Order.
The same tools used to overthrow the Hawaiian Kingdom were the same tools that have been used to overthrow the Sovereignty of all the monarchies and other assorted forms of native sovereign governments of the world in the last several centuries - debt enslavement of the government and (by extension the populace at large) through usury that results in the eventual usurpation of power, followed by enforced immigration of different cultures to break up the cultural uniformity of the populace, so that they cannot base an effective resistance to this usurpation of power around National pride and heterogeneous cultural ties that normally bind a community together.
Take a look at any modern day mass gathering of blood-descended Hawaiians and you will see exactly what I'm talking about. The brownskin Polynesian genes have been thoroughly diluted and most Hawaiians have been miscegenated into a melange of indistinguishable ethnic identity. Look at this recent photo from the Kamehameha Schools Song contest -- as every single student has some trace of Hawaiian blood, as it is a requirement for enrollment in that school -- but the pure Hawaiian genetic type has been overwhelmed by the mass migrations and subsequent miscegenation over multiple generations.
These are the 21st century Hawaiians...some brown, some displaying the "negroid" features of the Polynesian genotype...but most of it has been diluted with a mixture of Oriental, Caucasian and Hispanic genes. If we played "Where's Waldo" with this photo, in which Waldo represented the 100% pure blood Hawaiian, chances are most likely Waldo can't be found in this picture at all.
Not many 21st century Hawaiians that look like this are commonly seen anymore:
House of Kamehameha - 1853 |
In the 21st century, the Native Hawaiian race has been miscegenated to the brink of extinction. We are now almost completely assimilated into the globalized matrix of the Brave New World Order, and our colonization and subjugation is nearly complete. Mass miscegenation is the end result of the racial and cultural divide and conquer tactics THEY first use when they gain control of the government of any nation throughout history. Almost no modern Hawaiian today could ever seriously advocate the expulsion of the various races that have taken up permanent residence here.
No present day Hawaiian is going to support kicking out their Japanese grandmother or Chinese uncle or Filipino cousin or their Caucasian spouse's family to reclaim Kingdom of Hawaii for the Hawaiians. Thus, multi-generational miscegenation ensures entrenched loyalty to the new system THEY adminster, for which all the various imported races are now dependent on to exist in our present reality.
What THEY have done to Hawaii, they are now doing to the rest of the West.
Many bloggers of these politically incorrect fringes of teh Interwebz have touted the equation championed by the so-called 'race realists' of "neo-reaction" and "the dark enlightenment": diversity + proximity = war. That's simply the short view of the Cultural Marxist's use of multi-cult diversity and proximity as a social engineering tool to divide and conquer.
While enforced proximity serves the divide part of the equation in the short term, as long as the proximity is enforced over the span of multiple generations, the equation turns out quite differently: diversity + proximity = miscegenation and cultural homogenization.
This homogenized culture is no longer defined by race or ethnicity, but by the shared experiences and values of the mixed society that emerges from the blending of cultural traditions and customs by forced proximity over time.
This is the story of Hawaii, and it mirrors the story of the "white race" of America too. The history of American immigration is a history of every type of "white" immigrating from the old world and miscegenating freely in the new world.
In the 21st century, we casually refer to "white race" and the "white majority" or in $JW parlance "white privilege" or "white hegemony." But 16th and 17th century immigrants to America certainly didn't look at it that way. English, French, German, Spanish, Poles, Scots, Irish, Italians, Russians, et al all came in successive waves of migration, with each newcoming group of whiteskins getting the "nigger" treatment by the previous whiteskin migrants.
There was no 'white' solidarity and racial consciousness until several generations of Anglo-Euro-Celtic-Nordic-Aryan-Russo-Mediterranean whiteskins mixed and miscegenated into a melange of paleface uniformity, consolidated and unified by social conflict from proximity with "the others" of red, black, yellow and brown-skinned peoples.
But in another generation or two, these race-based conflicts are going to be a long distant memory, as all the various races mix, mingle and miscegenate. Soon enough we will all be nothing but a mass of intermixed peoples united under the tyranny of a global elite...an elite that are largely united by a specific religious ethos...the literal religion of Anti-Christ.
For everything THEY have done, is driven by the desire to overthrow any culture and society, whether they be composed of brown, black, red, yellow or white skinned people, that is based on the foundational teachings of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
And if ye lend to them of whom ye hope to receive, what thank have ye? For sinners also lend to sinners, to receive as much again. - Luke 6:34
I've come to the conclusion that distilled down to it's essence, USURY is the anti-thesis of the Gospel of Jesus. It is the wellspring of all the rest of the evils of modernism. It is the root cause of the subversion of Christianity and the evolution of what many are now recognizing as "Churchianity." It is the means for gaining control and implementing their agenda, which includes mass importation of non-native migrants to effect mass miscegenation.
"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws."
THEY have created a global wide system of usury to enslave the masses. To maintain this anti-Christ system of usurious control, THEY are seeking the mass miscegenation of all races, resulting in a globalized society, dispossessed of any sense of heterogeneous heritage or identity, nor any loyalty to a nation-state, but simply subjects to the homogenized culture of secularized mass media consumerism and globalized citizenship, enslaved to the worldwide system of indentured servitude and utterly beholden to this system of total population control.
It is my own view after considerable study and reflection, that resistance to the coming tyranny of the global elite will be lost if the resistance is based on any group of people trying to recapture the ideal of a heterogeneous, race-based culture that has already been miscegenated out of existence generations ago.
THEY are the heirs to the heresy and blasephemy of the ideology of the Pharisees who condemned and crucified the Messiah, for they are not interested in the Kingdom of Heaven, but in usurping the sovereignty and God-given rights of all of mankind, so as to establish their Kingdom of oppression and control here on earth.
The only possible victory in the face of this pervasive, ubiquitous system of Anti-Christ that now spans the entire modern world, is finding our way to the eternal salvation promised by Jesus Christ. For it is His gospel of forgiveness, repentance, atonement and salvation that stands in direct contrast to the ethos of hatred, revenge, envy and greed that THEY are ultimately enslaved to, even as they continually work to enslave us all.
Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free. - John 8:31-32
By their fruits, ye shall know them. |
16 comments:
Mmmm... Michener, my favourite author.
ONE Problem: AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY??
That is the crime.
One of your best, KG. Perhaps the best. Some people look forward to the cafe au lait society. Some people salivate at the prospect.
I was ruminating on this recently, suppose I still am. Cultural dilution. Adopting new traditions. Syncretism. It's sold as a benefit, a means of making peace. Sounds good. But what are you sacrificing?
Christmas is like this, for me. I'm from European stock, 100%. But my grandparents, parents, all American. The traditions of my great-grandparents' home countries get lost with each passing year. I'm trying to recapture them and initiate them in my own home, but it's tough. There are enough people around me who might remember some of them, but I don't know those people. My family isn't interested in being solemn about them, it's just a thing to do. No concept of connection to the past, no sense of history. Or rather, no sense that it matters, and matters a great deal.
Economic necessity brought my ancestors to America. They settled in communities of people like them, who spoke the same language and followed the same customs. They had their own churches and neighborhood civic institutions. Then those were broken up, too. Now, those old churches, I wouldn't recognize them. Some have been sold off and deconsecrated as Catholic churches and are used by the Christian denomination of the week to set up shop. Or gangs have ruined them with theft, graffiti, and arson. So sad.
But, broken eggs...can't have any people feeling safe and comfortable in a community of people like them. All must be brought in to the hive. It's for their own good, you know. My good, you're good, THEIR (as in THEY/THEM) good.
Yes, usury. Usury begets inflation, which leads to gross economic disparities and cultural decline... which leads to feudalism.
Get out of debt and turn to Christ. The two most radical things you can do.
I'm a bit of a Bavarian nationalist, but the most important thing traditions (even more recently-instated ones) do is create community. People in close physical proximity doing things together in regular intervals. This is critical. Also remember that all traditions were once new, and that the people who started them were usually a new genetic group from the one before, with one group blending into the other seamlessly. This is especially true in a crossroads country like Bavaria or Italy, or an immigrant nation like France or the U.S.A.
Do not despair!
Here is a blogger who discusses the actions of the elite Ashkenazim - the socio-conglomerates. Many of his columns deal with themes similar to you; the added benefit is that he is a prophet of God dealing with these last days of the United States.
It's funny because I see this issue completely differently:
1. Fierce nationalistic pride has always been the go-to of TPTB in the past to foster hatred and wars, to kill the "Other", and to conquer and subjugate--thus being ethnically separate always played into their hands within the "divide and conquer" method. God forbid we mix and stop hating each other for really stupid shit like buttering our bread on the wrong side of the slice...
2. I feel that interesting food/clothing/musical/artistic cultural distinctions should not be lost, but in some ways they are meaningless when divorced from their original lands. Wearing a sari in Canada is stupid, wearing one in India makes sense. Thus those who have left their native areas should adopt the customs of the new area in order the keep them alive in context, which would hopefully be reciprocated by immigrants making the reverse journey. In essence, you move to the society whose existing customs appeal to you, and take them on as your own to keep them alive.
3. I don't understand how you can make such sense and then suddenly bring up god-fairytales like Jesus, whose "story" has been manipulated and edited for centuries to serve those in power. Jesus was the reason black people were supposed to be enslaved to the white people, remember? Pointing to the Bible as some untouchable, pure, one-truth gospel is silly. It can be manipulated like anything else (AND HAS BEEN). A better way to phrase what you probably mean is to turn to your own inner morality, your inner truth of what is right and wrong and how others should be treated, not the sanitized-and-edited-for-the-masses version that organized religion relentlessly promotes for its own reasons.
4. If we all do TRULY integrate, and have relatives from all these different backgrounds, then what will happen is there will be ONE BIG LOVING MASS of humanity, who, when thus united, will be a GIANT UNSTOPPABLE OPPOSITION to those in power, whom they can no longer divide against each other and conquer! How can that be bad, so long as people commit to keeping cultural traditions alive, as detailed above in #2?
Jesus, whose "story" has been manipulated and edited for centuries to serve those in power.
Citation?
Jesus was the reason black people were supposed to be enslaved to the white people, remember?
Citation?
Pointing to the Bible as some untouchable, pure, one-truth gospel is silly. It can be manipulated like anything else (AND HAS BEEN).
Citation?
If we all do TRULY integrate, and have relatives from all these different backgrounds, then what will happen is there will be ONE BIG LOVING MASS of humanity, who, when thus united, will be a GIANT UNSTOPPABLE OPPOSITION to those in power, whom they can no longer divide against each other and conquer! How can that be bad, so long as people commit to keeping cultural traditions alive, as detailed above in #2?
But, they'll be part of that one loving mass of humanity. So loving that won't resist...anything, perhaps.
You cannot keep cultural traditions alive absent a culture to keep alive. Mass immigration and miscegenation destroys culture. One cultural form or norm will dominate another, relegating it to a lip-service holiday or the history books.
One Loving Mass Of Humanity. That's magical thinking, the mark of the Progressive beast.
Great post, HL! Comparative history is hard work with lots of details. I'd rather have infrequent posts like this than daily same old that can be found in archives.
Of course, I notably disagree in places precisely because we actually have some common intellectual ground, despite you being Xian and me being rationalist.
I suggest, with evo frame of course, that not only does ethnicity make culture (social values) but social values makes ethnicity. Instead of going back to the good old days, which I don't think you quite advocated, we men are challenged to create the good new days. I wish the turning point violence to come were not to be fought along lines of race, but I don't see enough philosophers (or otherwise intellectuals) able to amass a substantial physical force. I think that nature is a dance of ebb and flow between singularity (ethnic homogeneity or no ethnicity) and balkanization (ethnic heterogeneity). I think de facto principles of social organization matter, and if we can live by civilized principles enough, we will become whatever ethnicity or ethnicities is appropriate. Nature's math always works out with what is. Stagnation is 'sin' rewarded with death. The assessment will be in our favor if we can just get out of the way.
In closing, I suspect your labeling of centuries exhibits the classic 'off by one' error:
18th century < 1800s, to wit:
1800-1899 = the 1800s ~ 19th century = 1801-1900.
Amy - thank you, I don't think it was my best, but this one did take considerably more effort than usual.
Alte - I had a feeling you were going to end up commenting on this one. Have no fear, no despair here! Danke schoen!
nj - thanks for the link, a most interesting read, that blog is.
Lilana - Have no fear, I've spent the last several months doing extensive readings on a number of topics, which also includes reading the New Testament with an entirely different viewpoint. I found it quite illuminating this time around. I shall expound upon this further in the future. One thing I will say is this: my current views are definitely shaped by the Testament of the words Jesus spoke in ministering to the people and in rebuking the Pharisees. I am not pushing any particular church or denomination here.
Doug - Yes, as I wrote earlier, much of this post is the result of a whole lot of comparative studies of historical books and documents. Much more where that comes from.
I do believe I made an extra effort to get the proper centuries in context with the era was intending to reference. To which one do you think I erred?
I think that it works both ways, many empires exported their people to new lands in order to subdue the local population and turn the local culture more like the empires culture. Both the Greeks and the Romans did this and in a lot of ways it worked very well up until the culture of the empire began to decay at which time things reversed and the barbarians and their culture started to dominate.
I don't think that the plantation owners intentionally brought in foreign works with the thought of subjugating the Hawaiian culture but rather just grabbed whatever cheap labor they could convince to move out there and would most likely have preferred white's if that was their intention (which is what happened to most of America during the 1800's with whites pushing out the Indians and Mexicans). Also, by that time white labor was too expensive for the plantation owners so this was purely an economic decision by them (with slaves not being an option by this time as well, otherwise Hawaii would look a lot like the Caribbean). So from that perspective the Hawaiians were relatively lucky in that if it had been a primarily white influx most Hawaiians would have ended up on reservations and totally disenfranchised from their lands.
The bottom line is that the weak are always pushed out by the strong and if a people are not strong enough to defend their land it will be taken away from them. This has happened to all races all through time and will continue to happen until Christ rules this world. At that time each people will have specific boundaries set and that will be that. Unfortunately Hawaii won't be part of that if you take the Bible seriously as it states in Revelation 16:20 "Every island fled away and the mountains could not be found." Which is a bummer because I really like Hawaii and the mixed culture that exists there.
On another note, there is a lot of anti-white hate there and I expect that at some time what is simmering will boil over (had a friend that was put in the hospital by a bunch of Hawaiian thugs and was targeted by them because he was white). This is to be expected as the economic conditions in America decline you'll see the various cultures start to separate and the hate will go both (or several) ways. But the indoctrination of hate that is happening in the Hawaiian schools will eventually play out in the streets and if they do succeed in separating from America I fully expect either China or Japan to move right on in as Hawaii is still weak and alway will be and is in too much of a strategic location for it not to end up the vassal of some larger empire.
Gunner451
Honestly it's America complaining now, but what happens when America's dollar sinks, and China becomes the new land of opportunity? Immigrants will want to head to China, because that's where the money will be.
Then the Chinese can complain about immigrants to their country. America, and other western countries have only gotten the level of immigration they have, due to their fake economic success.
I think it won't last forever, and when the empire crumbles, the new empire will be the place to go.
And race mixing is a rarity still. Most white people still get with white people, black people with black people, etc. Most cultures still don't want someone marrying outside their own.
HL,
I am not as knowledgable about Hawaiian history as you. Since Hawaii became a state in 1959, I thought the cultural change would include the 20th century (1900s): "...the 18th and 19th century Hawaiian history, which was the period of vast cultural change..."
Also on immigration: "But 16th and 17th century immigrants to America..." That would be the 1500s and 1600s. I think you mean America the country and not America the entire continental New World. Columbus, 1492; Jefferson, Washington, 1776-18?? (18th-19th centuries were the Founding Fathers' time).
Keoni, Great to read that after years of indoctrination, you've finally broken the last chain (Plato's Allegory of the Cave). That said, the scars from the chains run deep and can take a long time to heal.
Serendipitous- I was reading the Irish Savant's blog post just a few days ago. I don't read Fred's blog; however, as with your blog, it sounds like he tackles many issues relating to THEM (in different ways than you cover, but THEY are still behind most of these issues), all the while never mentioning THEM. I consider you an intelligent, fine writer, so while reading the post I actually wondered if/when you were going to see the light, and/or tackle the issue of the Elephant-in-the room . . . and then today's post. Bravo!
Savant's blog link: http://irishsavant.blogspot.com/2014/11/i-solve-mystery-for-fred-reed.html
A few days later, Katana posts a compilation on Irish Savant's blog post "I solve a mystery for Fred Reed". Here: http://katana17.wordpress.com/2014/11/05/fred-reed-not-naming-the-jew/
Precisely why I had our ‘philanthropic + epiphany’ (=so much to give + vision): wanna see a perfectly cognizant, fully-spectacular, Son-ripened-Heaven?? … yet, I’m not sure if we're on the same page if you saw what I saw. Greetings, earthling. Because I was an actual NDE on the outskirts of the Great Beyond at 15 yet wasn’t allowed in, lemme share with you what I actually know Seventh-Heaven’s Big-Bang’s gonna be like: meet this advanced, bombastic, ex-mortal Upstairs for the most extra-groovy-paradox, pleasure-beyond-measure, Ultra-Yummy-Reality-Addiction in the Great Beyond for a BIG-ol, kick-ass, party-hardy, robust-N-risqué-passion you DO NOT wanna miss the sink-your-teeth-in-the-smmmokin’-hot-deal enveloping, engulfing us. Cya soon, girl…
Ah. I recently posted on immigration, and racial matters, too:
http://patriactionary.wordpress.com/2014/11/12/myexperiencewithracism-the-cbc-launches-a-campaign-inviting-minorities-to-bitch-about-racism/
Great post. Simple nationalism is insufficient. As usual, the brainwashed geeks think they're the smart ones.
As if the destruction of the Humanities means that there was never anything to study in the first places, and studying Engineering means that they know everything about the humanities.
Post a Comment