Friday, October 17, 2008

"Bi-Partisanship" Means Only One Thing




As one who has done extensive reading about the current sham of our political system here in the US, I am thoroughly convinced that the true agenda of the folks behind the social engineering that have infected society with such atrocities as the feminist assault on the nuclear family, a Federalized public school system designed to deliberately dumb down the masses, and the continued loss of our liberty and rights in the name of "security," is to keep the masses distracted with the "Right vs. Left" political theater while the true agenda of a one-world, socialist government continues it's long march towards global domination.

While many conservatives have been excited about the Sarah Palin nomination, I believe she is either being duped into thinking she can effect conservative changes in the government should she succeed...or she's just like McCain and Obama, and is nothing more than a pawn, bought, sold and controlled by the true powers that be.

In either case, the proof is in the pudding. Look no further than the latest call for "Bi-partisanship" by Obama and McCain...


"Now is a time to come together - Democrats and Republicans - in a spirit of cooperation for the sake of the American people," Democratic nominee Barack Obama and Republican nominee John McCain said. "The plan that has been submitted to Congress by the Bush administration is flawed, but the effort to protect the American economy must not fail."


If Palin were a true "conservative republican" how could she continue to run as McCain's partner in this blatant socialization of the financial markets? On principle, she should resign in the face of this blatant push for a government takeover of a private market.

If Obama were a true "working-class democrat" how could he be for giving millions of tax payers dollars to the filthy rich, corrupt corporations?

Answer: because right/left, democan and republicrat are really two sides to the same thing.

Glenn Sacks also recently wrote a blog post that demonstrates exactly what I'm saying:

No Friend to Fathers Among the Presidential & Vice-Presidential Candidates

All four of the candidates for president and vice-president this year have displayed hostility to fathers in one way or another.


That's because both parties will talk about marriage and family values, yet the true issues that are detrimental to the state of marriage and family values is the divorce industry and misandrist legislation like VAWA. Instead, We the Sheeple are deliberately brainwashed and distracted into arguing about Same Sex Marriage and other garbage that truly only effects a very small percentage of a very small special interest group, while the true agenda of destroying nuclear families and enriching the divorce industry, and replacing Fathers with an extensive welfare state and child support peonage system continues to be the huge elephant in the room nobody ever talks about in mainstream political discussions and media coverage.

Whenever I hear the term "bi-paritsan," I remember what Thomas Sowell once wrote years ago in one of his columns (I'm paraphrasing from memory):

"Whenever I hear the term 'bi-partisan' the only thing I think of is BOHICA: Bend Over, Here It Comes Again."

2 comments:

Elusive Wapiti said...

HL, this is OT, but I wonder if you had seen this:

Hawaii Drops Universal Child Care

As to your post, couldn't agree more. We have a bi-factional ruling party. Even McCain's calling Nobama's tax plan socialist rings hollow to me, because I'd bet dollars to doughnuts that McCain thinks our progressive income tax and welfare and EITC are just swell. And he voted for the bailout too...just what in the sam hill does he think the bailout was?

SellCivilizationShort said...

Good point on the Ruling Party and its two wings ... also I think photoshop is the new editorial cartoon medium.