The election of the Trumpenfuhrer was just the beginning. The Whitelash is rising and the American melting pot is about to boil over. America has endured eight long years of a grievance-mongering, professional community organizer as President, and he has certainly organized our national community like no other President before. We are now organized into competing factions according to race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, N-count, documented citizenship status, public bathroom gender preferences and political persuasions...
...on towards Helter Skelter!
And while there are a number of false flag events that have no doubt been engineered to promote the divide and conquer (and ultimately disarmament) of the masses, the social engineers operating their diabolical plot of infiltration, subversion and convergence of the country at every level are also undoubtedly ready at a moments notice to seize any unplanned occurrence to continue to promote their overriding agenda. This, I believe, is what just happened with the current Whitelash against the Black Lives Matters social justice movement.
Remember one of their favorite mottoes is to "let no good crisis go to waste."
Note how quickly the kidnapping and torture live stream event in Chicago has been labelled with what first appears to be a rhetorically devastating label of "#BLMKidnapping." This is an example of effective, grass roots rhetoric gone viral and leaving the FakeNews establishment scrambling to regain control of the narrative.
Facebook, Twitter and YouTube took the livestream video of the event down within hours after it became apparent that a virtual Whitelash was starting to build. Google apparently configured their search engine algorithms to return several articles to the top or the search results protesting the association between the crime with the Darth Soros-funded Black Lives Matters organization. As of this posting, the top result of a Google search for "BLM Kidnapping" is: Alt-Right Trolls Use Chicago Kidnapping to Spread Lies About Black Lives Matter.
FakeNews strikes again!
But what has largely been lost amongst the static of the FakeNews establishment's backlash against the viral Whitelash, is the acceptance of the thoroughly anti-freedom, thought-policing and unconstitutional HATECRIME charges that have now been applied to the four racist hatemongers.
As if kidnapping and torture are not enough to send these sub-100 IQ morons to jail for decades. No, shouting racial epithets pushes these terrible crimes into unpardonable crimes against humanity! Much of the viral Whitelash found in comments and tweets all over teh Interwebz where pointing out the hypocrisy of the establishments hate crime laws, and many were almost certain they would avoid Hate Crime charges because the perpetrators were black and the victim white.
Indeed, here a few select tweets from #BLMKidnapping before the announcement that they were to be charged with the Hate Crime statutes-
"I don't know how to say this diplomatically. If you deny #BLMKidnapping was a hate crime against a white person... you're despicable."
"If what the kidnapping and torture of the autistic teenager in Chicago is not a hate crime, then hate crimes do not exist."
"Chicago hate crime law. This is clearly a hate crime. Why have Chicago police refused to label it that? #BLMKidnapping"
"There is more evidence the #BLMKidnapping is a hate crime than that Russia hacked the election"
"The Chicago attack was a hate crime against white people. @POTUS why aren't you condemning this?? #BLMKidnapping"
"The #BLMKidnapping is a verified racially-motivated hate crime. Barack Obama must come out and declare it as such."
Sadly, a number of these same folks were then ecstatic when it was announced that they would be charged with the Hate Crime statutes:
"Thankfully, the #BLMKidnapping terrorists were charged with a hate crime!"
"Hate crime charges. This is a victory for our disabled. This is a victory for our most vulnerable. Not just a crime. HATE."
The Matthew Shepherd and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act passed by congress and signed into law by our "Constitutional Scholar" President in 2009 is the "hate crimes" law that has fundamentally altered the Nation's conception of freedom of speech. Prior to this #BLMKidnapping event, I don't think it would be a stretch to say that it was the largely the "RIGHT" aka the conservatives, the Republican - Tea Party contingent that largely opposed the Hate Crime laws as an abrogation of the First Amendment and another step towards totalitarian and authoritarian thought control and oppression by FedGov over we the sheeple.
For the past seven years, we have had a number of cases for which crimes against any minority ethnic or homosexual committed by any persons with a lighter shade of hue to their skin who once drunkenly uttered the N-word ten years ago at a party, got the additional Federal charges of Hate Crime tacked on to their prosecutions. But the cases of any crimes committed against heterosexual white Christians in this country by any anointed minorities have not seen the use of such statutes to date. But now we got our Trumpenfuhrer taking over, and we got ourselves a growing Whitelash, it's about time we got us some equality going here!
Hold off on the celebrations for a moment now....what exactly is being won here? Equality for whites under social justice, at the expense of our Freedom of Speech? For make no mistake about it, these Hate Crime laws were lobbied for and passed in the name of social justice. The Hate Crime legislation is patently unconstitutional and should have never been passed in the first place. That they have been used almost exclusively on white's charged with crimes of violence for the past seven years doesn't mean it's time to celebrate that we've finally got a case for blacks to get hit with the extra charges of Thought Crime. That's just affirming and upholding laws that should have never been passed in the first place. Kidnapping, assault with a deadly weapon, terroristic threatening, burglarly....all these charges in this case should be more than enough justification to sequester these hoodlums into the Prison-Industrial complex for long enough to see appropriate justice done.
It's the Hegelian Dialect in action, and we've now arrived at the desired synthesis. Many of the folks that were formerly opposed to
 |
14 comments:
"Principled conservatism" has been proven a poor strategy. Rules for Radicals: Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules. Surely you can see that the Constitution is nothing but a dream? I was once very strongly attached to it myself. If John Roberts is willing to use it as his own personal toilet paper, why should ordinary people give it a second thought?
This reminds me of the things Fedrz tried to warn us about many years ago. Sadly most people don't realize that applying unjust laws both ways will not help them in the long run, it just gives more power to the government.
Anonymous:
Conservatism without principle is nothing. John Roberts is an example of an unprincipled conservative; i.e. a Neocon.
@ Anon - Surely you can see that the Constitution is nothing but a dream?
At this point, the increasingly compromised Bill of Rights is the only thing left between the citizenry and a completely totalitarian FedGov. We can look at all the violations of the Constitution for the past century and declare it completely worthless....yet it is the second amendment that has kept what little rights we have left. The fact that so many citizens keep and bear arms is the ONLY reason we have any freedom whatsoever left to us. So no, the Constitution is not a dream, it is a sinking ship like the Titanic...it's going down, but we 'aint under water yet, and thanks to the second amendment, the band still has a few songs left to play on the deck.
@ Deansdale - Yes, totally. That was his warning to the Men's Rights movement well over a decade ago. Glad to see you're still around!
@ Night Wind - Conservatives with principles end up conserving the gains made by the liberal-progressive SJWs of previous decade.
In the 80's, the principled conservatives opposed no fault divorce. In the 90's and 00's, the fight against divorce was forgotten, as they all wanted to "save marriage" from the gays. Now in the 10's...the gays can get married and the principled conservatives have no principles regarding marriage left to conserve.
You cite the second amendment, on which I agree with you completely. That is how you know this is war, not a legal dispute or a philosophical one. The Constitution has some lovely points, but as we have seen, it says whatever the Council of Nine says it says. So don't complain when your side wins one, by whatever means. This is war.
While I understand the "use their own weapons against them" stance of "THIS IS A HATE CRIME!" screeching, endorsing any form of legalized thought policing is short-sighted to the point of calling into question such claimants' ability for rational thought. The victims of non-"hate" crimes don't suffer any less (or lie less still) and only the most wretchedly lacking-in-empathy statists can't see this.
Nope. You're wrong. Raping them with their own chainsaw is just desserts and perfectly valid.
Hate crime laws will not be repealed until the left feels sufficient pain from these unconstitutional abominations. Any other course is a naive pipe dream that has been proven not to work.
Sorry dude, but hate crimes aren't crimes in and of themselves. The hate crime statutes (and each state has their own) are sentencing adjustments, they simply reflect the notion that if you kidnap and torture a white kid BECAUSE he is white, you get extra time in jail. Kidnapping gets X, torturing gets Y, but if you do it based on some set of predetermined reasons, you tack on Z. They don't ge tacked on just because the victim is another hue, you have to have clear indications that their actions were motivated by hate.
This is constitutional. Stated and the Congress have wide latitude in determine Pino's he still according to motivation. This goes to the whole concept of manslaughter, negligent homicide, murder 1, murder 2, what have you.
Now, you can argue the propriety of hate crimes laws, but you can't argue their constitutionality. I personally agree that kidnapping and torture ought to give you life, so added a hate crime adjustment is unnecessary, however, the commenters are correct in that the only way to get rid of this garbage is to prosecute the proponents under them.
This is the part where Homer goes "D'oh!".
And I sadly agree. This is yet another nail in the coffin, and we helped hammer it home.
Wald
Hate crime legislation being named for Matthew Sheppard shows how specious it has been from the start. Sheppard was a little scumbag killed over drugs by his own gay lovers who were also involved with drugs. The whole media portrayal of that incident was more fictional than Avatar.
The only way to get rid of the law is to use it against the left.
I have always opposed the concept of "hate crime" as it allows a "second bite of the apple" or second chance to prosecute someone. Forget slippery slope, those laws are a direct drop to the bottom of the pit. Rather than use "their own chainsaw" on them, this is when you twist the arm of the statists to get the laws eliminated. As HL alluded to, bad law left in place simply encourages bad outcomes and the continuing corruption of the system.
Obama (aka Frank Marshall Jr.) still has time to pardon them along with Kermit Gosnell. -The Jack Russell Terrorist
Post a Comment