Wednesday, May 2, 2012

let freedom ring

Some anonymous person found my blog, read my last post and left the following comment:

What you really don't like is the freedom that women fought valiantly for, and over a ridiculous amount of time, acheived. It's over little men, and your patriarchial utopia exists only in your dreams, and the ash heap of history.

Gotta love all this freedom we're experiencing. Thank you, oh valiant women who fought for this current utopia we are all living in for a ridiculous amount of time!

What's not to like about the new normal of all these broken homes, destroyed childhoods, rampant divorces, declining marriage rates, expanding police state, and a record number of incarcerated citizens? Surely things are so much better now! We are living in a milieu that is so obviously a vast improvement over the "patriarchal utopia" we little men are pining away for!

I'm truly grateful to have been given this wake up call from delusions of utopia by anonymous commentary at my blog! I had forgotten all of these freedoms women have valiantly fought for!

Let us recall all of these freedoms "...that women fought valiantly for, and over a ridiculous amount of time, acheived!"

The following are these hard won freedoms of the 21st century, empowered, liberated female, as noted by a former daycare worker, who observed the behavior, attitudes and actions of mother's and the children they used to pay her to care for, while they were busy enjoying all this freedom that valiant women acheived (over a ridiculous amount of time!):

We are free to take vanity to bizarre standards and measures – those created by the beauty, health, and media industries – that mandate skeletal thinness, life-long photo-youth looks, tanning bed skin color, Botox shots in the face, fake breasts, fake fingernails, waxing, manicured eyebrows, plastic surgery of every make and measure, bleached teeth, and unending and life-long diets. 

We are free to fall into the trap of the mandatory mental health industry – supporting big pharma and the New Freedom Initiative on Mental Health – by our addictions to anti-depressants to the tune of millions and millions of American women now zoning out on a daily basis with mood-altering drugs. 

We are also free to become useless in our homes. We now hire maid services, landscapers, pool cleaners, painters, interior decorators, cooks, nannies, teachers and tutors, caterers, therapists, party planners, massage therapists, laundry services, etc., while losing every intuitive instinct of our female natures. 

We are free to have extra-marital affairs, multiple lovers, to abort children, to disrespect and ignore the traditions of our families and religions, to use men like ATMs, to back-stab our friends and family members, and to take thousands upon thousands of family dollars for personal use in our missions to look like (and act like) teenagers. 

We are free to have children with as many men as we choose, and to bankrupt multiple men with mandatory child support payments.  

We are then free to ignore children by paying far more attention to maid-cleaned, spotless, and magazine-cover homes, where no cooking is achieved, no family memories are created, and no shoes are allowed to be worn on the white carpets of the “new” American home.

We are free to give our children computer software to keep them addictively occupied for YEARS, and then complain about their lack of social skills. 

We are free to completely ignore the FACT that our children are SUFFERING with mean-spirited and incompetent mothers – children who are hungry, starved for attention, and mistreated by non-stop extracurricular sports regimens, drive-thru bags of dangerous food, teachers and public school indoctrination camps, completely ignored spiritual needs, and disrespect and contempt of their children’s fathers.
These exercises in freedom were so commonplace, she ended up with enough material to write a book about it: The Cultural Devastation of American Women: The Strange and Frightening Decline of the American Female (and her dreadful timing)

And what has all this freedom created?

Sadly, this list has become the typical “home” scenario for America’s children and husbands. “Home” has become sterile because the women in American homes have lost their senses under the highly political guise of “liberation.” 

So, another question begs – what does liberation mean to American women? Does it mean the freedom to vote? Freedom from historical gender bondage? Freedom from ownership?
I don’t think so.
Today’s American female is free to be an idiot – a shallow, self-involved, pathologically vain, completely incompetent, and angry person – angry to the tune of making the anti-depressant industry the largest profit maker, bar none, for big pharma. 

Stupid is what stupid does. 
American children do not have happy homes. They are television and computer addicts thanks, primarily, to mothers. So sorry, but facts are facts. American children have so many video games, movies, and “equipment,” that we now have to have “media rooms” to contain the sheer numbers of purchases made to very purposefully ignore our children. 

Then add to the mix that American women can’t and don’t cook. They don’t know how, and furthermore, between jobs, beauty and “health” regimens, and chronic diets, today’s mothers feel like crap most of the time, which translates into anger in the home. 

Just ask dad (or boyfriend).

Most never think to ask. Then they discover this little sector of teh interwebz called the manosphere, and they're shocked that there exists people who are not enthralled with all this progress and freedom those valiant women fought so long and hard for. (Never forget, it was a ridiculous amount of time!)

Don't worry...just keep exercising your freedom! You need not worry about us men longing for our mythical Patriarchal utopia. That, as you correctly noted, is in the ash heap of history...along with all the other terrible things that went along with it - like orderly and civilized society, made up of stable homes and happy children.


Jim said...

No they aren't free just yet. Big daddy still frowns down at men who act like the guy in this video but soon even that won't keep women from achieving real equality. Just like homie in the video said, ya'll bitches be talking trash well here, have a dose of freedom.

Anonymous said...

You're looking at this comment from the wrong perspective (the man's perspective). If you turn this around and look at it from a woman's perspective she is absolutely right. Women have been empowered to do whatever resides in their dark little hearts with no consequences what-so-ever to them and in a lot of cases (like divorce) they actually get cash and prizes to let their hypergamy run wild.

It's a great day to be a woman! The freedom to do as you please without any short term impacts means that they can destroy those around them at a whim or not, who wouldn't revel in that kind of unrestrained power? You have the power of the state at you're beck and call and if your husband/BF displeases you one simple call to 911 and 4 burly dudes with guns will take him away and a judge will ensure that you never have to deal directly with him again! Wow, who wouldn't want that?

And the long term costs? "Well that's for tomorrow as right now I'm a hot woman with with high SMV and I can do anything!". You go grrrl!

Johnycomelately said...

"Magazine-covered homes where no cooking is achieved."


Wp said...

Shit, I'll gladly let the woman make all the $$$ while I be stay-at-home-dad.

So hard to clean, cook, and teach children. They are liberated now and can WORK for 40 hours a week! HAH! Women are victorious!!!

Women had it rough, HL, you insensitive guy you.

Jacqueline Ottley said...

This is just...awesome. As a woman, I can entirely support your argument. Apparently, "freedom" is defying nature.

**** ***** said...

or in Jacqueline's case: FREE to wear hipster glasses, fake the classic hipster aloof/half awake/tired? look....and dream of attending a college in the city, or making craft, locally made chocolate covered peanuts.

finndistan said...


Yea, women fought so hard... In the mines, in the sewers, on the warfield (my uttermost respect goes to the few women who did, and the many other support troops like nurses, doctors etc), in the chemistry lab, in the garage, on the mountains...

And now they have freedom, they give birth to kids which are put to daycare after month 11 (bargaining that 11 is close to the legal age 12), and then when the kid is back home, it is given an ipad with angry birds. What a freedom.

Slaving away in some career (job), while havign some low wage indoctrinated worker experience all the milestones of a child growing up.

What a freedom.

and yea,

If fighting with dead goose to pluck white feathers from dead geese, to give it to young men, so they will die for you, is "fighting hard",

Then yes, women fought so hard. Wow. Ooooooh... Yiiieeee!!!!


Men need to go on strike for two weeks in the western world.

Suz said...

No need to mock Jacqueline, unless she shows herself to be a fraud. Men still want women, and if she's the real deal, she might be one of the few worth having. If she "gets it" at her age, she will likely grow old happy and content. And so will her husband. Is that something to mock?

Anonymous said...


11 months! Only in Finland or some other European countries, perhaps by law. In America, sometimes the child is as young as SIX WEEKS OLD when they enter daycare so Mommy can return to work. In the US, unpaid maternity leave is 12 weeks, so I would guess most babies are about 3 months old when they enter daycare, and some professions, like teaching, will offer a tenured teacher up to one year (unpaid) off.

There was a recent report on CNN about how it doesn't make sense for many women to work after children because the cost of daycare, commuting, food, clothing, and other miscellaneous expenses that come with having a job renders her salary net neutral at best. Of course, most people saw the issue as a reason to once again raise the argument of wage disparity, etc...

It's so tiresome being here and aware sometimes.

A.L. Haines

Anonymous said...

"What you really don't like is the freedom that women fought valiantly for, and over a ridiculous amount of time, acheived."

I must have missed the "Battle of A Thousand Tramp Stamps" in history class,could you kindly enlighten me as to how many casualties female soldiers in that battle had? Oh,that's right,you didn't have any, because you didn't have to fight ANYBODY for your rights,whereas any democratic society in the world was purchased at the expense of thousands or hundreds of thousands of male lives in direct defiance of a totalitarian dictator or drug cartel or jungle warlord or power-mad king and his FUCKING ARMY.If it wasn't for us,you would be fucking executed for saying shit like that."Really don't like freedom",what fucking planet do you actually live on,bitch? Hell, a lot of us are veterans with missing eyes or arms or legs that we left on a fucking battlefield for your freedom. We LOVE freedom, and we want more of it for ourselves and FUCK YOU if you don't like it.

"It's over little men, and your patriarchial utopia exists only in your dreams, and the ash heap of history."

That's what you feminists don't understand,it's not over. It's never going to be over.We will grind your precious supremacist ideology under our feet as we march over you to history.

It is only just beginning.

Jean-Luc LeGame said...

Great post.
We are free to take vanity to bizarre standards and measures – those created by the beauty, health, and media industries – that mandate skeletal thinness, life-long photo-youth looks, tanning bed skin color, Botox shots in the face, fake breasts, fake fingernails, waxing, manicured eyebrows, plastic surgery of every make and measure, bleached teeth, and unending and life-long diets.

This is so true. It's absurd how women buy all these magazines written for women and sold to women about how to look, then go complain about men's high standards. Women create this absurdity and then cry as though they were victims.

Bob Wallace said...

That comment was in response to an article
I wrote and posted the link here.

Self-Deluded Ambitious Spinsters

It appears the poster did not read the article, or glanced through
it. He/she/it certainly didn't understand it.

The Cottage Child said...

It's funny to think of the suffragettes - stomping around and protesting for their "rights" - while their husbands worked. It was bored rich women who apparently needed a say so.

Now, it's poor idle women. I'm confused, what happened? Oh, yeah - exactly what was predicted would happen. I LUVS TEH VOTING! My husband now involuntarily fathers an assortment of children (and when I'm working, I mother them - but none of them gives me smoochies or complements my cooking). YAY!

NO MA'AM said...

Everything that is not forbidden will be mandatory.

Women only understand totalitarianism, because they are designed to care for little children - who need totalitarianism.

This is why it was so important for men to have "rites of passage" - so that they outgrow the totalitarianism of mother - who tries to keep boys and "men" at her level of totalitarianism - in other words, as children.

Manhood not fought for is manhood not won, so it is not wrong for it to be a struggle for boys to struggle to escape mother's totalitarianism.

But women NEED men. And men are not on the same level as boys or women. They grow "higher" than the woman. Thus, when boys grow into men by cutting the apron strings to women's totalitarianism, they have something to offer women and fulfill Briffault's Law.

“The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place.” -- Robert Briffault, The Mothers, I, 191

Our society is being aborted at the "boy" stage by removing fathers from boys lives. Women not only want "security first" but they also only understand totalitarianism, because that is what is needed to raise children.

They have no idea about men, especially not how to create them... yet they NEED them.

Chris said...

@ No Ma'am.

Women may need men (well, not really, Plenty of spinsters have become aunts and had cats. It is a life... and it was deliberately chosen by a subset of women who did not want to do the married thing).

But women cannot demand a man. They have to accept that he is more than a possession or a toy.

Because we can walk away.

What is happening is that many of us who have been thru the divorce thing are not dating much. We have too much self respect to go into the meat market / singles bar scene and too much experience to just look at the surface. We have children to think about.

The consequences are that many women who think they can find a better man can't, using the standard tactics. For the men they want are not there.

And this... affects women more than men.

Anonymous said...

The chicks movement was astroturf. They didn't "fight" for shit.

Anonymous said...

Don't delude yourself. Society demands we offer our children the world on a silver platter. And to expect them to clean their rooms would be exploitation.