Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Requiem For A Shoe Salesman




One of the originals of the MAndrosphere has gone on to The Great Gig in the Sky.

My favorite Canuck from Canuckistan has announced the passing away of his blogging career with a final post that contains a cornucopia of links to some of his best works throughout the past 9 years. I've read all of those articles, several times each.

Rob was THE MAN of the manosphere, long before anyone called it such a thing.

He was the guy that first inspired me to begin blogging here.

He gave me my first shout out and has been one of the most influential bloggers to ever wield the keyboard against the feminazi hordes, and has certainly cast his shadow across the growing expanses of these fringes of teh Interwebz.

Don't miss his last words at No Ma'am.

Rest in Peace, Rob Fedders. You will most certainly be missed.

But please sir, as your departed blogger-soul wanders off into the ethereal wasteland of teh interwebz afterlife....I implore you to please remember THIS passionate exhortation you once wrote:

Of course, not all people will want to keep blogging forever. If you no longer feel the motivation, that's fine. It is a thankless job and the pay sucks. But please, oh please, don't delete your blog! Not only does it remove from the internet a significant body of work that others might find and read, whether old or not, but it also removes all of those links in the articles, in the comments, and on the sidebar, which support those of us who still are blogging.

Most guys who quit blogging have not lost the faith in the message, they simply are fed-up with blogging. There's nothing wrong with becoming a Man Going His Own Way (MGHOW) and moving on - in fact, it is one of the natural conclusions of MGTOW. But please, if you've found a path to enlightenment through MGTOW and the manosphere which resulted in you starting up a blog, leave your work up so that others may find it, and so that the links in your blog may direct others towards those who are still actively blogging about it.    

 A hui hou, Rob.

Tuesday, July 23, 2013

The Red Pill Bookshelf



"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Seems like over half the Manosphere is made up of men who think that discovering Game and using it to understand how women think, what they are attracted to, and how to get laid is the sum totality of what the "RED PILL" represents.

Contrary to one of my earlier posts stated belief, that Game is the Red Pill, I've come to the conclusion that Game is only one aspect of the search for the truth. The "MATRIX" is in fact an entire system created to enslave us all while making us believe that we are "free." The Matrix IS our Brave New World Order.

The raison d'être of the Matrix, is in fact total population control. Not just how many people mate and reproduce, but how we think, act and behave as one part of the collective entity called humanity.

Unplugging from the Matrix requires far more than simply deprogramming the socially engineered programs to indoctrinate we the sheeple in dysfunctional thoughts and behaviors regarding sex, gender and procreation. Other areas of deprogramming cover banking, money (debt), diet, exercise, the system of education and understanding the true structure of "society."

Gaining an understanding of the big picture of our Brave New World Order has never been easier than the current epoch of the free flow of information now made available via teh Interwebz. Better yet, just about every resource you need to grasp this big picture is available for free by downloading and reading these 10 books:

1984 - by George Orwell

Brave New World
- by Aldous Huxley


Rules For Radicals (pdf)
- by Saul Alinsky

The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America
- by Charlotte Iserbyt


The Underground History of American Education
- by John Taylor Gatto


The Garbage Generation
- by Dr. Daniel Amneus


The Case for Father Custody (pdf)
- By Dr. Daniel Amneus

Nutrition and  Physical Degeneration: A Comparison of Primitive and Modern Diets and Their Effects
- by Dr. Weston A. Price


The Creature From Jekyll Island (pdf)
- by G. Edward Griffin

The Protocols of the Banksters of Rothschild
- by Lucifer's Sycophants

Of all the books listed, this last is the most controversial. It's been called a forgery, a fraud, a blood libel and nothing more than a screed of anti-semitism propagated by racists and hatemongers. Due to it's extremely controversial and inflammatory nature, it is also the only book I'm going to have to write a disclaimer and explanation for on this post. I am not an Anti-Semite (I hate all races equally...misanthropy FTW!).

I anticipate sometime in the near future that anyone linking to, quoting or downloading the Protocols may be itself considered a thought crime or an exercise in criminalized hate speech, so I say read it now while you still can. You don't have to accept it, endorse it or advocate for it to simply read it.

I suggest one should simply read the text in it's entirety with an open and impartial eye to understand what it is describing and advocating, and you will quickly realize that the Protocols are really just a blueprint for how the elite 1%'s have been dividing and conquering we the sheeple for generations now. Trying to lay the blame for this on an entire class of people - aka teh Joooooos! - is a complete red herring. As I wrote about over a year ago in the comment threads for my post, The Tyranny of Usury:

I do not cite the PEOZ to "prove" the "Jews" are responsible or liable or guilty of anything.

Seriously, some of my best friends are Jews. LOL

However, Jews like the Rothschilds have certainly used the perception of Jews as the most unjustly persecuted people in world history as a cover.

And if you actually read the POEZ, you quickly understand that it's really not about promoting anti-semitism, but rather understanding the mindset of the ruling elite.

Substitute the word "Gyoim" with "Sheeple" and you see precisely how we, the Proletariat of the Brave New World Order are just "cattle" to the elite powerbrokers and oppressors of all humanity.

The race/ethnicity of the authors of the Protocols is immaterial. Your neighborhood Jewish person is most assuredly not "in on the Conspiracy." Most Jewish folks are just as much victims, dupes and/or useful idiots of the Protocols designs for Global Government as any other class or race of we the sheeple in our Brave New World Order. Remember: We are ALL Zionists now!

There's a reason why I listed The Creature From Jekyll Island second to last on this list, just prior to the Protocols.If anyone wants to really look at who's behind the implementation of the Protocols, simply look at the names of those involved in The Creature From Jekyll Island. You want to point the finger at those responsible, you'll find no better target to apportion the blame on then those men who conspired to enslave the world with their debt-based Central Banking plans.

Protocol 20:

What also indeed is, in substance, a loan, especially a foreign loan? A loan is - an issue of government bills of exchange containing a percentage obligation commensurate to the sum of the loan capital. If the loan bears a charge of 5 per cent, then in twenty years the State vainly pays away in interest a sum equal to the loan borrowed, in forty years it is paying a double sum, in sixty - treble, and all the while the debt remains an unpaid debt.

From this calculation it is obvious that with any form of taxation per head the State is baling out the last coppers of the poor taxpayers in order to settle accounts with wealthy foreigners, from whom it has borrowed money instead of collecting these coppers for its own needs without the additional interest.

Now were these preceding paragraphs really sourced from a forgery? Does it matter? They sure seem to accurately account for the current state of all Western Nation's that have Central Banks in charge of their monetary policies. For this reason alone, a serious, contemplative reading of the Protocols is necessary to understanding the reality of the world we all live in.


http://www.blogblog.com/scribe/divider.gif


I've read most of these books I've listed at least twice, and some of them several times over. Taken in sum total consideration, it becomes apparent that this system we call "society," was deliberately designed to make us go mad:

The social engineers that have shaped our society and our culture have a full, working knowledge of our human natures, our desires, our biological imperatives, and our instinctive proclivities...and they have deliberately and deviously gone about subverting, distorting and contorting those needs, wants and desires to create a script for which we unknowingly and unwittingly follow...immersing ourselves into lives of artificial constructs that deliberately go against our natural state of equilibrium.

If you ever feel like you're going crazy in a world gone mad, that is precisely your cognitive dissonance of your natural instincts clashing with the unnatural script you are trying to follow to achieve "success" and "happiness." This purposely instilled discombobulation was designed to leave you confused, tired, overworked, and in ill health, unable to contemplate their devious machinations to subtly and covertly control your life.

To put it in even simpler terms - to render you easily manipulated, our Brave New World Order's social engineers have deliberately scrambled our understanding of gender relationship roles, familial roles, dietary nutrition and health, understanding of finance and economics, and a proper understanding of education.

These 10 books I listed come together to present us all with a clear picture of our current reality. Our countries are in decline, the economy is tanking, and the foundation of civilization - the nuclear family - is being torn apart.

In addition to these 10 free e-books I've linked here, another good source of red pill knowledge would be the compiled list of required reading by the manosphere's most infamous commenter THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN.

All men should begin immediately by reading the following books which the central bankers and their fellow churchians hate, fear, and detest:

0. THE BIBLE
1. Homer’s Iliad
2. Homer’s Odyssey
3. Exodus & Ecclesiastes & The Psalms
4. Virgil’s Aeneid
5. Socrates’ Apology
6. The Book of Matthew & Jefferson’s Bible
7. Plato’s Repulic
8. Seneca’s Letters from a Stoic
9. Aristotle’s Poetics
10. Dante’s Inferno
11. The Declaration of Independence
12. The Constitution
13. John Milton’s Paradise Lost
14. Shakespeare’s Hamlet
15. Newton’s Principia
16. Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations and Theory of Moral Sentiments
17. Henry David Thoreau’s Walden
18. Mark Twain’s Huckleberry Finn (& all of his work)
19. Shakespeare’s Hamlet
20. Ludwig von Mises’ A Theory of Money and Credit
21. F.A. Hayek’s The Road to Serfdom
22. Herman Melville’s Moby Dick
23. Einstein’s The Meaning of Relativity
24. Joseph Campbell’s The Hero With a Thousand Faces and The Power of Myth
25. Ron Paul’s Revolution & End the Fed
26. THE BIBLE

The list of free e-books I provide here are important in understanding how and why we are, where we are today. GBFM's list represents the canon of Western literature, and is important in understanding, rediscovering and preserving the ideals that has been lost, subverted and obscured by all the social engineering through public education and mass media indoctrination we've all been subjected to.

I've read most of GBFM's list, but there are a few I've yet to get to (4, 6, 8 15 & 24). Anybody have any further suggestions to add to either list?

Let's all get on with our red pill readings!

Sunday, July 14, 2013

What's Wrong With Equal Custody?



What's wrong with equal child custody in the case of divorce? I've answered this question before:

Fighting for 50/50 custody default is NOT a desirable result to fight for. If this is what a Men's Rights Movement decides to fight for, good luck with that gentlemen. You are merely fighting for the right to dictate the terms of your enslavement.

What does a 50/50 default custody truly represent? A three-way parenting model. The Ex-Husband, the Ex-Wife and THE STATE being the final arbiter and decision maker in child raising decisions.

In other words, we'll call it 50/50 default custody, but what it will be in practice is 25/25/50 custody. 25% for Mom, 25% for Dad, and 50% THE STATE.

Recently, Bill Price asked the same question, but this time from a slightly different angle: What’s wrong with men having equal custody so they can avoid child support?

I said that people will often accuse men of wanting custody so they don’t have to pay child support, but instead of saying “that’s not true,” I said “so what if it is?”


Most fathers really do love their children, so it’s an unfair accusation and a low blow in most cases, but not wanting to pay child support is indeed a motivating factor in custody battles. Likewise, receiving child support motivates women quite a bit, and has been found to contribute directly to likelihood of divorce. Money matters.

But think about this: if taking care of one’s child and being an involved father is a good thing, then isn’t it good that men would rather take care of their kids than cut a check every month? Is there anything wrong with them preferring parenting over being an ATM?

I absolutely agree with this re-frame of the mainstream narrative of our mass media driven society. The standard trope is that Men who want to avoid paying child support are deadbeats and one of the lowest forms of sub-human in our Brave New World Order.

Bill makes a very good point that is always ignored whenever that meme is repeated.

"Only if the mother has a problem with it, and that’s exactly what’s wrong with the current system of mother custody combined with state enforced child support. If anyone cares to know why fatherlessness became endemic in the black population, and now the Hispanic and white working class, it’s just this refusal to allow men to act on this incentive to raise their kids. If the state were truly interested in reducing fatherlessness, fathers would be allowed to avoid child support by taking care of their kids half the time. If parents don’t want their kids, then fine — have them pay CS. Otherwise, let them do their part and raise their own kids."
 
Ah, within the preceding quote lies the answer to Mr. Price rhetorical question: "If the state were truly interested in reducing fatherlessness."

I would venture to say that not only is the state truly not interested in reducing Fatherlessness, it is in fact interested in increasing it.

I expound on this further in my latest post at The Spearhead, Here's What's Wrong With Equal Custody.