Eumaios commented over at The Solomon Group: "This post is easily in the top 5 best man-o-sphere writings ever."
While I wouldn't say "easily," it's certainly up there...the wisdom of the elders gained from life experiences makes compelling food for thought, and Solomon's sharing of "Old Man Philly's" diatribe on modern women versus a lady like his wife is certainly compelling.
Both of my boys are married to two of the biggest bitches and liars on the planet. Jim is an aeronautical engineer with Boeing, and Tony is a corporate lawyer for Apple. I raised both of them to have balls big enough to handle anything, but these harlots give them hell constantly. Women these days are spoiled and irreverent, and they’re not worth more than a fuck. One of my boys played College football in New York, and the other in Pennsylvania. I taught them to be men, not pussies. But I swear to God these two bitch daughters-in-law of mine have my whole family worked up. They threaten divorce, flirt with other men on the computer, and send those things that are like phone emails [text messages] to other men with words that are inappropriate for a married woman. My sons find them later, but they can’t say anything or they’ll end up in a screaming fight or divorce court.
I told both of my boys that I was disappointed in them for letting women get to them like that, but after I started talking more to those two cunts [yes, the old man really said “cunt”], I realized that even I couldn’t do a thing with them. I mean, it’s crazy. You can’t punch them, but that’s exactly what they need. They need a man to knock the shit out them and then see how independent and feisty they feel. Both of those bitches are worthless, and need to be put in their place. They’re both brats.
I’m glad you two boys are smart enough to see through that mess and deal with these girls they way they deserve. Keep treating them like the rubbish they are unless you want to end up like my two boys.
They're not worth more than a fuck, because that is precisely how the majority of women are raised in our Brave New World Order nowadays. There only value to men is the access they provide to their bodies, just as the only value men have to the women of today is access to their sperm and than their bank accounts.
Old man Philly points out that this is not beauty.
Listen to me. A good woman ages beautifully. When I look at my wife, I see the most gorgeous woman in the universe. Her wrinkled hands got that way by keeping up with my two boys and working hard for them while I was on the road. The lines under her eyes are from years of shedding tears for me when I was at war, and those wrinkles on her brow are from decades of worry for me and my two sons. It was her legs they held on to when they were learning to walk, her lap was where they learned to read, and her breasts were their first nourishment. The first kiss those boys ever received was from her lips, and God willing, my last kiss will be from her lips.
You two don’t know what you’re missing – or maybe you do. But all I know is that she’s as beautiful, desirable, and lovely today as the day I met her, and I wouldn’t trade one second with her for a lifetime of rowdiness with one of those harlots you guys have waiting for you back home.
You two don’t know what beauty is. In a way, I feel sorry for both of you. I’m not getting on your case, because if there’s one thing I’ve learned from my own sons, it’s that women aren’t what they used to be.
The whole thing is just goddamn pathetic if you ask me.
Oh, it's worse than pathetic, Old Man Philly. It's devious, malevolent and nefarious.
It's social engineering deliberately instigated on society at large to control the population.
It's the result of the institutions of Government used to take over the role of inter-generational cultural transmission.
How women used to be?
Women used to be raised in two parent households in which her Father was her authority figure, and her mother her guidance and vocation counselor...and that vocation was home-making.
Women used to be raised by their mothers and grand mothers and aunts to become the heart of their homes. Yes, they would depend on their husbands for their economic provisioning capabilities...but their husbands would depend on them for their familial nurturing capabilities. Both roles require some forms of sacrifice to benefit the singular entity - the family.
The way women (and men) were changed, was the intrusion of the State into the family unit, to replace the means of transmitting cultural values.
Instead of learning how to cook from Mom, they learn how to pick up takeout on the way home from work.
Instead of learning how to sew to make or repair clothing, they learn the joys of going to the shopping mall and whipping out the credit cards to remain relevant to the latest fashions.
Instead of learning how to nurture their husbands to appreciate the sacrifices he makes to provide for the family, she learned to get together with her girlfriends and complain about his personal habits and peculiarities.
Instead of learning about chastity from her mother to save her virginity for her husband so that they will create a strong bond upon consumation, she learns her sexual morality from the television, movies, and gossip magazines and the cult of celebrity and promiscuity that these mass media sources endlessly promote in a myriad of ways.
Instead of learning how to care for her children as they grow up, they learn how to drop them off at school, than daycare, while they go out and seek to take on the provider role for themselves as well.
None of these learned behaviors contribute to the growth of a family unit. Instead, they are merely culture constructs designed to outsource the role of the home-maker to corporations and businesses, so that both the husband and the wife are than free to become human resources for the labor market, to pay for all of the consumables and services that make it possible for two parents to work while other people raise the children...that is until of course the divorce.
Women used to be raised to create long lasting, happy families. Now they are raised to never form them in the first place, or to haphazardly make them and destroy them.
I wonder if my former #1 girl or Brooklyn’s wife will ever have a strong Alpha male talk about them the way Philly talked about his wife? I highly doubt it. But once again, a very simple principle is repeatedly ignored by women like this: They can choose to be sexually popular for a few short years in the eyes of every man, or opt for a lifetime of beauty in the eyes of the one man who loves them.
Ignored? More like brainwashed into believing that the lifetime of beauty is boring, unfulfilling and nothing more than oppressed slavery to Patriarchy. Besides, those "few short years" can be extended by plastic surgery, and botox injections.
Beauty isn’t skin deep, and it doesn’t fade. Beauty is not a physical attribute; it’s an aura that is admired by men and women, young and old alike. Beauty is a timeless gift given freely and without hesitation as a birth right to all young women, but very few of them recognize, protect, or cherish it.
Philly’s sermon about his wife is proof that women can age beautifully, but unfortunately, it takes a little grace, class and effort *gasp*, so the modern woman opts for being sexy in lieu of being beautiful. The world is crawling with sexy, ugly women who should not be valued for anything more than whats between their legs – it’s the only thing you can count on out of womankind these days.
NAWALT...there are still women who are raised in stable, two-parent homes with parents who provide the full spectrum of complementary nurturing and provisioning from Father and Mother...but enough of them are that the society at large is on the verge of collapse.
Some women may read this post and think that I'm being unfair or focusing solely on women to blame the entire gender for the current dystopia of our declining civilization.
The reason the focus is deservedly aimed at women-kind is simple: society and civilization can only exist when a cohesive social order is established...and the only way to establish that is to channel the primal force of human sexuality into productive channels. And since women are the gatekeepers of sex, it is female sexuality that needs repressing to create the conditions for civilized society.
You cannot control male sexuality unless you control female sexuality. As long as the social stigmas and economic penalties for irresponsible female sexual behavior are nullified by the State and the culture, civilization will decline.
Patriarchy didn't just control female sexuality...it controlled male sexuality as well. If Men wanted to have sex AND approval from the peers in his community, marriage was the only acceptable means of expressing his sexuality.
This is precisely why the cultural marxists behind feminism based their revolutionary tactics and strategies to attack the role of women in Patriarchal civilization.
Men are not the way they used to be...because feminism caused women to change from the way we used to be.
And we are all worse off for it.