Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Game is the Red Pill

Now that it appears the debate between the PUA/MGTOW/MRA blogosphere about Game and it's relevance and morality has cooled down a bit, I would like to reiterate the one point I believe is most relevant for why all men should take an effort to understand Game without trying to marginalize it or write it off as completely erroneous, simply because you object to the morality espoused by the PUA...or that you think Game is a silly, manipulative script that men follow simply to get laid.

To use the Matrix allegory, Game is the Red Pill.

...something happens which makes us question those very rituals we've blindly followed and we are confronted with a choice - shall we take the blue pill and choose to ignore any inconsistencies with our own paradigm which works pretty well, or shall we take the red pill and explore these inconsistencies knowing that it could lead us into a world we aren't familiar with... one that questions the very foundations of our current perspective.

In this context, I think it's perfectly fitting to describe the social engineering by cultural indoctrination and conditioning that has been effected for the last century regarding gender roles and attitudes towards institutions like the Patriarchal nuclear family; the confusion engendered by the "battle of the sexes" and the legal system of sexual/social politics; is all really best described as a mass delusion...an epidemic of blue pill-addiction.

Symptoms of blue pill delusions are ubiquitous, and it manifests itself all over the place. Only the few red pill takers...those that understand the reality of gender relations...are even aware of just how widespread the mass delusion of distorted gender roles is inculcated into mainstream consciousness.

And this is where "Game" comes in. Game is the red pill because it is based on men analyzing what behaviors are attractive to women, and what behaviors are not.

It is the basis for just about all social dynamics amongst any human interaction...why men compete with other men (for access to women)..why women compete for the attention and affection of men they perceive as desirable to other women.

Game is the Red Pill because it deals with understanding the principles of observable truths that are field tested...and these truths are in direct contradiction to the blue pill delusions of preconceived notions regarding gender roles in our BraveNewWorldOrder.

Once we learn of that new paradigm, we can no longer hold the older belief as our truth. Not everyone can deal with this kind of thinking. Many people are perfectly content believing something to be as they've always known it to be, and reject this newer attempt at truth because it's too painful to accept - they've been living their entire life based on this lie and only now they come to discover that the world is not what they thought it was.

Unlike the caricature portrayed by it's detractors, Game is NOT a simple ruse...a routine or a schtick to manipulate or trick women into having sex with men. No, it's about truly understanding social dynamics and the role that social hierarchy plays in any human interaction. Once you have this understanding, you begin to see "THE MATRIX" or false reality of delusions regarding gender relations.

I thought of this as I read the comment section of Dr. Helen's blog post that I cited in my last post on Relationship Dynamics. So many Men weighed in with their comments, unknowingly revealing the depths of their blue pill instilled delusions that contributed to their failures in their relationships.

Here are a few quotes that demonstrate this blue pill effect:

And whenever your woman asks which of two paint colors you prefer, you have to say you don't care. The alternative is surely picking the wrong color and paying dearly for it.

This is blue pill induced paranoia. Fear of "paying dearly" for upsetting a woman. Anyone that even has a rudimentary understanding of Game knows exactly what to do should a woman ask a man to pick a color...

My ex-wife used to love to put me into impossible verbal situations such as, "do you think that (super model) is prettier then me?"

Wrong answer #1: Yes
"You don't think I'm pretty!"

Wrong answer #2: No

So I found myself avoiding talking to her at all.

Taking the blue pill renders many men utterly clueless to the "shit test." And failing these tests are relationship destroyers!

Here a few more comments showing the blue pill-addled mindset:

I do think, however, that women manipulate more. They cry, they feign anger or hurt, they tell you stupid things like "a man doing the dishes is sexy" or "I'll be happy if you ___" (and if you refuse you don't want her to be happy).

Of course, women lie to. Unless, of course, you really believe she's had a headache for 6 solid months or is somehow turned on by a man pushing a vacuum.


I'm a good guy. I don't cheat or go places I shouldn't or do things I shouldn't or drink too much or any of that stuff. I have nothing to hide from my wife, but I have learned the hard way that if I tell my wife the truth about certain things -- especially my feelings if they're at all negative -- then I'd better be prepared for two or three weeks of significant pain.

Helen is right. I want to be a truthful person with my wife, but it just isn't worth the hassle -- especially since she's made it so clear that she really doesn't want to hear the truth.


No offense, but sometimes women are just plain scary.

Are you beginning to see the common thread here? How the blue pill mindset has left so many men so clueless about how to deal with their wives and/or girlfriends? All of these preceding examples are Men who are afraid of their wive's emotional state.

For the majority of husbands, they married a woman who they could communicate with and formed an allegiance. Her attitude became far less tolerant and hostile after. (There are many reasons for this that I won't go into here.)

To rethink his attitude may invite a firestorm into his home. To rethink his allegiance will cost him dearly--he'll lose his children, and quite possibly pay huge bucks for his wife to move someone else in.

Your advice would be great if the laws were not so biased in favor of women. Men have much to lose and little to gain by standing their ground. Women have much to gain and little to lose by villainizing their husbands and divorcing him.

I get this impression that there exists a commonly held notion amongst MRA that ever since feminists got no-fault divorce legislated, all women have taken to it with great gusto, simply because they can...that the laws give women gold digging powers, and they take advantage of it simply because it appeals to women's greed, and they will happily destroy the lives of their husbands and children to sate that lust for greed.

I beg to differ. There's much more to it than that.

Because if a married man stands up for himself in today's climate, he could very well find himself put out of his own house, paying over a substantial chunk of his paycheck to his ex-wife, and seeing the kids when (and if) she decides that.

This is what I call the Emasculation Paradox.

Many men today seem to think that the legal system is set up to give all the women the power in marriage...so they'd better cede it to her to avoid upsetting her so that she doesn't take you into divorce court hell. But the paradox is that a man who understands the reality, also understands that STANDING UP FOR HIMSELF is the ONLY WAY his wife CAN respect, admire, lust and love him.

You really shouldn't worry about upsetting her. She's a woman. She gets upset as surely as the sun rises in the East. What you you have to worry about, is turning into someone she doesn't respect...and patronizing her because you are afraid of her emotional state is the fastest path to losing that respect.

When contemplating why we now have over 70% of women who initiate no fault divorces, there's much more to it than simply because all women are greedy, slutty, or adulterous simply because that is the nature of modern, Western women. Yes, there are most certainly a segment of the female gender that is in fact materialistic gold digging manipulators. But I don't think it's quite a stretch to simply say that the 70+% of women that initiate their divorces do so because of a greedy, materialistic nature.

No, you HAVE to account for the social engineering of our BraveNeWorldOrder on BOTH genders into account when trying to understand just why so many women "change" for the worse by getting bitchy, nagging, fat and absolutely contemptuous of their husbands after they get married...and why men that used to be bold, assertive and confident when they were dating, fall into the relationship dynamic where they are the pussywhipped, cowed and beaten wimps absolutely crushed under a domineering harridan of a wife.

In short, it's nothing more than a blue pill overdose. Taking the red pill will open your eyes to the reality of the female sex drive and how it's basis on the principle of hypergamy dictates her behavior. It provides a solid understanding of exactly why women on an instinctual level, require men to be the dominant leaders in the relationship. Whenever a man fails to fulfill that role, the relationship begins it's death spiral towards oblivion.

Attraction is not an intellectual vocation. This is why "marriage counseling" usually doesn't work. No matter how many logical reasons there are for a woman to be happy in her marriage...if she has that visceral contempt for the man that turned into a "Beta" in the marriage bed and impregnated her with his inferior seed, she cannot control how she FEELS about that. Because by him "becoming" beta, she only feels disgusting contempt for him in her gut.

This epidemic of blue pill delusion that doesn't recognize this basic understanding of female attraction is why I believe so many women turn into the proverbial psycho ex-wife.

It's women's basic biological nature to seek dominant genes for her offspring. Yet too many men beta-ize when they get married, submit to their wives as their authority figure, and even if she THINKS it's perfectly fine to be the dominant one...that she is just exercising "equality," her basic instinct is to have utter contempt for a man that she can rule.

This is precisely why so many men seem dumbfounded that the sweet loving girlfriend they married turned into an uncaring psychopath without a shred of mercy or decency in dragging him through the divorce court system and all of it's vagaries and indignities it inflicts ...THIS occurs because for the most part, because both of them failed to follow their natural gender roles, and the very nature of her sexual instinct -- hypergamy -- makes her regard him as a sub-human creature of utter contempt.

It is the very premise for the "game" routine that Roissy and other PUA call Marry Shag Kill

You have to understand why women have this curdled reaction to betas deep in their bones. If a man spills his seed in the wrong woman, no biggie. He can still bang other women and fulfill his genetic programming. If a woman gets her eggs polluted by the feeble seed of a beta, she’s stuck for nine months, and probably longer.

This is why there are so many cases of these women feel justified and entitled into getting the most they can from a divorce settlement...even if she's the spouse that ended up breaking her marital vows.

Beta Contempt.

By the time you are being taken to the cleaners, she is merely carrying through with the legally accepted means of playing the very real version of marry/shag/kill...with you being the Beta Sap she "kills."

I've come to realize this when I've thought long and hard about almost all of the failed marriages and relationships that I know of throughout my life. I can think of no exceptions in the cases where the female ended the relationship. It always happened after the man no longer fulfilled the leadership role her biological imperative requires.

The cultural indoctrination of our BraveNewWorldOrder -- the blue pill culture -- encourages these relationship malfunctions in every conceivable way. It's memes and shibboleths are ceaselessly pushed by our mass media driven popular culture to try and ensnare as many men and women to fall into this devious trap as possible. It is a population control agenda at it's most subversive.

To put it succinctly: The blue pill encourages masculine behavior in women and feminine behavior in men.

It encourages women to strive to hold all of the power in a relationship dynamic, and encourages men to cede that power to the women.

By promoting the ubiquitous culture of misandry, and making everyone strive for the unattainable goal of "equality," they push men and women to act out in ways that are contrary to our natural gender roles, thereby effecting an epidemic of "beta-ization."

Feminist lobbying for No-fault divorce was the mechanism for the BraveNewWorldOrder to attack the nuclear family; to re-make society by first destroying it's foundation...but it wouldn't have been nearly as effective if it were done without the social engineering that promotes contrary gender role behavior...empowered women and emasculated men.

Monday, September 14, 2009

Relationship Dynamics

One of the most important realizations I've come to with regards to being married, is to gain a very real understanding of the role in which my relationship dynamic plays in the long-term state of our cohabitation.

And it is the underlying assumption I've tried to impart to other people in the discussion of "Game" in a long-term relationship or marriage. It is the most important thing I've gleaned from studying on Game, and I've been trying to come up with a much simpler way of expressing this idea I've put into practice and has improved my own marriage in a very profound way.

To put it simply, you need to look at your interactions with your wife/girlfriend and ask yourself a question: does my behavior or conversations with her resemble a relationship between a man and a woman that desires him...or does it resemble a little boy afraid of upsetting his mother?

In my opinion, this is the very "essence" of LTR game...the defining distinction between acting "beta" or "alpha." It is in effect, the diametrically opposing dynamic between Patriarchy and Matriarchy.

In other words, the old joke "Who wears the Pants in the family?" But this question, which often is used to elicit laughter, is no laughing matter. I've come to understand that it is actually the primary determinant of whether or not a relationship will last...if the woman will end up cheating and/or divorcing. Eventually, most women will have a deep-seated, visceral contempt for a man that acts as if he is her child...and that extends to all other areas of attraction and bonding.

And our current cultural paradigm is certainly a matriarchal-focused one in ways to innumerable to list. But the attitude is certainly ubiquitous. Take Dr. Helen's latest blog posting, Lies or Self-Preservation?

I was listening to Neal Boortz this morning and heard him talking about new research that shows men lie twice as much as women. I thought his point was good. Boortz felt that men were probably "lying" to their wives in response to questions such as "Do I look fat?" And indeed, when I looked through the main reasons men lied, most had to do with placating women:

1. Nothing's wrong, I'm fine

2. This will be my last pint

3. No, your bum doesn't look big in that

4. I had no signal

5. My battery died

6. Sorry, I missed your call

7. I didn't have that much to drink

8. I'm on my way

9. It wasn't that expensive

10. I'm stuck in traffic

I think that often men lie because they will get a very severe response from women if they tell the truth. For example, if a woman says, "What's wrong?" and rather than reply, "I'm fine," the man says, "You are driving me crazy and I need some time away from you," there is a good chance the woman will make him pay dearly for the remark. I don't know about you, rather than lies, I think many of these quips are more like self-preservation.

I think Dr. Helen is correct, that men often lie for fear of upsetting their wives/girlfriends. But the way in which Dr. Helen has posted this, it seems that she is implying that this somehow excuses or mitigates the gender perception of who lies more? I know Dr. Helen is an avowed anti-misandrist, and often tries to look at topics of conversation and tries to point out obvious misandry...but in this instance, the most relevant thing about the observation that men "lie" more than women is not "WHICH GENDER LIES MORE" but rather, how many men find themselves in relationships in which the dynamic is Matriarchal versus Patriarchal...


If you find yourself lying to your wife or girlfriend out of fear that you will upset her, you are catering to her emotional state. You are in fact, acting FEMININE.

A healthy relationship is one in which their is BALANCE between masculinity and femininity. So by you acting feminine, you are throwing your relationship out of balance...and whether you realize it or not, you are sowing the seeds for future discord. One attribute I think we can say about Masculinity is calm, assertive confidence. Would a calm, assertive and confident man feel the need to lie because his woman might get upset?

Women's base sexual nature is to lust for dominant males. If you let her dominate, she will build contempt for you, and it will kill her attraction for you...which will make your relationship much more vulnerable for the old "I'm just not in love with you anymore" or "I'm just not happy" or "I don't know if I can do this anymore!"

To take another look at Dr. Helen's list of common "lies" men tell their wives or girlfriends:

1. Nothing's wrong, I'm fine

What he should have said: "I'm not in a good mood, and I don't feel like talking about it. I'll talk to you about it when I'm ready."

2. This will be my last pint

What he should have said: "I'm having a few drinks. I'll be home when I'm done."

3. No, your bum doesn't look big in that

What he should have said (with great, sarcastic exaggeration for effect): "Your ass looks HYYYUUUUUUGGGGGEEEEE! We better not wear that to the beach, you might be mistakenly harpooned as a blubber seal!" Than he should've spanked her ass and walked away.

4. I had no signal

5. My battery died

6. Sorry, I missed your call

These last three all relate to a man purposely not answering his phone because he's afraid of what his woman will say to him when he answers. He's afraid of telling her the truth. In short, he's the little boy pretending he doesn't hear his Mom calling for him to get home because he's having too much fun on the playground.

A man confident in his masculinity and role in the relationship should have no fear of answering the phone and telling his woman exactly what he is doing. If she's gonna get upset that you are enjoying yourself...so what?

7. I didn't have that much to drink

What he should've said: "Yeah, I've had a few drinks...I'm feeling pretty good!"

8. I'm on my way

What he should've said: See you when I get home.

9. It wasn't that expensive

What he should've said: Nothing. If you're the man, and you make the majority of the money in the relationship, you have no reason to justify any expenditure of the money you earned.

10. I'm stuck in traffic

What he should've said: I'm running late...I've been enjoying myself and lost track of time. See ya soon.

I'm positive that there are many men that simply cannot conceive of ever talking to their woman like that...hell, I was one of 'em.

What I've come to understand is this: acting Beta...MADE ME A DISHONEST LIAR.

Some guys try to say 'acting Beta' is just being "nice" and that women are unreasonable or screwed up in the head because they are "acting bitchy" when a guy is "acting nice."

Nothing could be further from the truth. Acting Beta, and living in fear of her emotional state MAKES YOU A DISHONEST WEASEL that in the long run, she cannot respect, lust or love. You are not a Man of your WORD if you are acting like this.

Even if you know a straight, direct answer will upset her, you need to realize that all women are much more influenced by their emotional state than you ever will be. If you think your goal for a "happy relationship" is to try and never upset her, I've got news for you: women will ALWAYS become upset about something or another.

It's up to YOU to be the stable, calming influence, to compliment that emotional roller coaster - to balance out her Feminine emotional-influenced state of mind with your calm, confident expression of logic-grounded masculinity.

Attraction and respect from her can endure and even grow despite her being upset with you for staying out late a few times. But I assure you, any woman whose man uses ANY of those 10 "lies" Dr. Helen listed, SHE KNOWS YOU ARE LYING.

By trying to appease her with these lies, you are fooling nobody but yourself, you're killing her respect for you, and you are killing her attraction for you.

Better to let her get mad at you for a awhile because you're out having a few drinks with your friends and lost track of time...but still have her respect you for being a man, being truthful, and not cowering in fear of her emotional anger.

When dealing with your wife or girlfriend in any manner, you can analyze your actions and behavior by asking yourself which relationship dynamic are you engaged in?

"Is this what a man would do...or what a child would do trying to avoid punishment from his mother?"

If it's the former, you may have an upset woman to deal with for a little while, but so what? That's life living with a being that is much more influenced by her emotional state! There are much worse things in this life than an upset woman...like a woman that DESPISES the spineless, sackless, wimp that she has to mother.

If you're following the latter dynamic, you ARE most assuredly heading towards a bad ending, whether it be a divorce or a sexless marriage full of contempt for the man-child she doesn't respect or lust...afterall, what normal, sane woman is sexaully attracted to her SON? Because if you are acting like a child, she is acting like a parent by default.

Much has been debated as of late between the MGTOW/the So-Cons/ and the Roissy-sphere regarding "game" and morality, and whether or not their is any relevance with regards to Roissy's "PUA" philosophy and long term relationships. There are two rules that Roissy listed in his "Sixteen Commandments of Poon," that are true and speak to ANY relationship with a woman...whether you're a hedonistic cad looking to pump and dump or you are a man married for 20 years:

IV. Don’t play by her rules

If you allow a woman to make the rules she will resent you with a seething contempt even a rapist cannot inspire. The strongest woman and the most strident feminist wants to be led by, and to submit to, a more powerful man. Polarity is the core of a healthy loving relationship. She does not want the prerogative to walk all over you with her capricious demands and mercurial moods. Her emotions are a hurricane, her soul a saboteur. Think of yourself as a bulwark against her tempest. When she grasps for a pillar to steady herself against the whipping winds or yearns for an authority figure to foil her worst instincts, it is you who has to be there… strong, solid, unshakeable and immovable.

XV. Maintain your state control

You are an oak tree. You will not be manipulated by crying, yelling, lying, head games, sexual withdrawal, jealousy ploys, pity plays, shit tests, hot/cold/hot/cold, disappearing acts, or guilt trips. She will rain and thunder all around you and you will shelter her until her storm passes. She will not drag you into her chaos or uproot you. When you have mastery over yourself, you will have mastery over her.

Friday, September 11, 2009


To all the innocent victims caught in the events of that day that were designed to manipulate the masses into surrendering our freedom for the false promise of security and to provide a rationale for sending our young soldiers off to war for the continued advancement of our BraveNewWorldOrder,


To the first responders that gave their lives, and to those that put their lives on the line to save their fellow citizens, your bravery, courage and deeds will not be forgotten and will serve as an inspiration and example for future generations in showing what true heroism is.


Thursday, September 10, 2009

I Do Support Men Going Their Own Way

I've had a few debates here and elsewhere regarding MGTOW philosophy, and I just wanted to make it quite clear that although I've had a few pretty vehement disagreements with some of you MGTOWers, I do want to reiterate my main point: given the reality of institutionalized misandry and the feminist cultural zeitgeist that is our present day reality, I do not condemn, marginalize or criticize the MGTOW philosophy or men who choose to follow it's tenets.

I only tried to point out that while most women raised in our twisted culture are indeed fucked in the head and incapable of being a suitable mate for the traditional model of marriage, not all women are like that.

Yes, I'm perfectly aware that the "not all women are like that" is the standard trope most women use to justify feminist propaganda...but in terms of femininity and character, not all women are utterly beholden to feminist shibboleths or consumed with misandry...and that you may perhaps one day some of you may very well meet a woman who is suitable.

Believe me folks, my awakening to the reality of our world did cause me to do a really serious contemplation of my own personal situation, and the character of the women I'm married to. Had I determined she were not suitable, I would most certainly have pulled the plug.

The only real point I've been trying to make all along is that should you find a suitable woman (foreign or otherwise), you DO have a personal responsibility to understand and fulfill your role to strive for a successful, Patriarchal-modeled nuclear family. There is a masculine role you have to fulfill to compliment the feminine role a suitable women will take should you decide to take the ultimate risk in today's feminist dystopia and get married and have children.

I repeat...I believe MGTOW is perfectly rational and sane response to the insanity of our BraveNewWorldOrder's Matriarchal Hegemony!

Blogger Sociopathic Revelation from Feminist Apocalypse left an excellent comment on my previous post regarding Men's Rights Awareness, and I wanted to re-post it because he summarizes the reasons why I DO support MGTOW. He was responding to this part of my argument:

"But I have encountered quite a few MGTOW guys who seem to almost revel in pure, unadulterated misogyny...and that the worst thing a man can do is get married, because ALL women are the same. Some of these guys don't even realize it, but they become the mirror image of the utterly misandrist feminists they despise."

Perhaps. But you have to remember those men as being no better is a rather tricky posit. I realize there exist men that would take away women's right to vote or similar things, but it comes to financial and social servitude, feminists have got real misogynists beat, hands down.

Theirs is institutionalized.

I myself certainly don't hate women, but it's even easier now days for the accusation of misogynist to come rolling off people's lips. I've been dubbed as one simply because I've criticized feminism---that's often enough for someone to dismiss me entirely. By doing so, they miss the messages, and the philosophy behind them is crucial.

What this does, of course, is shut off any meaningful discourse and let's face it---men's voices have been zipped up for many years for the most part---unless you are a liberal politician, a woman firster, metrosexual, or mangina.

And looking around at an anti-male cultural and seeing what an undercurrent of a matriarchal strain can do, men are gradually waking up. And with that will be resentment. It's difficult to hear some of it because it's been buried too long. But by shaming men as "bitter" because it exists---and for more legit reasons then some might think---does not do anyone any good. That expression needs outlets for growth and change, and when that doesn't happen, sometimes it gets warped.

As I've stated in my own blog, I certainly don't approve of what Sodini did and he's no hero, but I honestly think if he had discovered MGTOW and PUA years earlier, he would have never killed those women and himself. He would have been a changed man.

He would have had choices---and that's what makes a really powerful difference in a man's life.

I've been writing lately about how our culture views men that are not successful with women as losers of some sort. What I do think MGTOW does is help validate themselves and their masculinity without the need for that affection 24/7, and if men decide to engage with women or not is up to them, ultimately.

And let's face it---there are an awful amount of women out there that reinforce the idea that men are creeps and nobodies even if they have standards and just don't screw anything that moves. And if are aggressive with women, you're dubbed a player even if you haven't slept with a hundred barflies.

Sadly, this is a nasty mentality that many carry even in their 30s and 40s; the other day I was lurking on a "romance" forum and was watching a woman gleefully call anyone who didn't share her dating optimism as bitter. She seemed to even take a perverse joy in it, and her comments were all directed towards men.

Like Zenpriest, I realize that it's not the best way for men to be alone forever, but as a self-preservation tactic I understand it. Hell, I've even surprised a couple of MGTOWers when I said I still seek out friends with benefits now and again---that I shouldn't have anything to do with US women at all. I understand the sentiment, but I personally feel a bit of my humanity has been shelved. But, on the other hand, I also acknowledge when there are men that have been burnt so badly they opt out of the game, period.

For those want to still be with women, there are foreign and minority women and alternate routes. I claim no expertise on FWs, but for those who want marriage and family and have success, more power to them and best wishes.

Just as SR wishes the best for those of us that do choose to take the risks and get married...I too wish the best of success for all of you MGTOW. May you have success in your endeavors to define yourselves in this life by going your own way and not falling for the idea that the approval of women is the definition of having a successful life.

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Happiness in Slavery

Hey strong, independant, educated & empowered Womyn...

....how's that career thing working out for ya? Thank god you were able to go to college, get that degree and fulfill yourself with a career, rather than saddle yourself to a man, bear his children and become a domestic slave!

Looks like plenty of the sisterhood doesn't share your enthusiasm for self-fulfillment through the college/career track though...

A survey of nearly 4,000 women, conducted by Woman's Day and AOL Living, found that 67% of American women would change what they do "in a heartbeat."

Another 79% said "no way" would they want their kids to follow in their footsteps.

But at the same time, nearly two of three women are worried about getting laid off - and just as many would work longer hours just to keep their paychecks.

Welcome to the world of Male Privilege, ladies! Aren't you glad you're self-actualized and empowered to realize the full promise of a career and education? And to think...we men have conspired for centuries to keep you from all of that fulfillment! Thank god for Women's Lib!

You now have the equal rights to become a wage slave financially independent, just like us men! Lucky you!

"I can relate," said Janis Luciano, 40, a Bronx mom of a 17-year-old daughter who works in banking.

"No, I don't like it, but I have to make ends meet," she said, adding that her costs are about to skyrocket as her daughter begins college next year.

Yes...gotta send her to college to study liberal arts and Womyn's studies or god forbid she gets married, has kids and becomes a full-time housewife domestic slave to Patriarchy!

The poll, which will be released today, also found that 57% of women dream of quitting altogether to stay at home with their kids...

Why do so many womyn pine away for the life of a housewife domestic slave? Look at all of the federal subsidies for education, day care, extended family leave, affirmative action laws, gender quotas, sex harassment laws...the feminist movement has worked SO HARD to ensure that you ladies would have the assistance and help to escape the comfortable concentration camps of domestic slavery! You ungrateful bitches!

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

Hope for the Best...Prepare for the Worst

On December 29, 2008, the Wall Street Journal online headlined: "As if Things Weren't Bad Enough, Russian Professor Predicts End of US"

For a decade, Russian academic (and former KGB analyst) Igor Panarin has been predicting the US will fall apart in 2010" to include an "economic and moral collapse, a civil war, and the eventual breakup of the country."

That was 8 months ago.

As every day passes, I walk through life in amazement at the behavior, actions, attitudes and beliefs of all the blue pill swallowers I'm surrounded by. Brainwashed sheeple wandering around in the haze of delusion fostered by our very real, Matrix-like society. Our society is a cultural/social paradigm that essentially resembles one big, gigantic Ponzi scheme on every level of existence. Lies built upon lies upon lies, heaped atop deceptions and piled on with more misinformation.

Almost no area of our lives has been left untouched. Our families, our food, our health, our history, our personal relationships...all of it...socially engineered and carefully inculcated by our schools and mass media to manipulate the masses towards something...the more I see, the more I believe.

Long time readers of this blog know that I ascribe to the conspiracy theory of a powerful elite cabal, working to institute a One World Government (which I've begun calling our BraveNewWorldOrder)...in the sense of the big picture, it makes too much sense in going towards explaining the dramatic changes in societal beliefs and attitudes in a relatively short period of time.

It's obvious that the crisis mechanism is the primary means to institute radical changes...and our economy is certainly in "crisis" mode.

Many like to draw parallels between now and the Great Depression. Austrian economists are quick to point out Obama's current policies and actions mirror the same policies and prescriptions employed by FDR that actually extended and worsened the economic conditions of the Great Depression.

Many people like to think that as bad as things are now, this country will come through it as we have in the past.

However, taking a look at the big picture...I don't think so. While the economic conditions and Government actions may be similar, in some very fundamental ways, we are much, much different world from the world that existed during FDR's Administration.

In the age of FDR's Great Depression, there did not exist the social chaos, the cultural decay that we now endure. People had faith in god, and a general code of conduct as laid out by the Judeo-Christian code that was fundamentally based on the "Golden Rule." Behaviors that were once recognized as destructive to the social fabric of society and stigmatized by the mainstream...are now celebrated and praised.

Broken homes are endemic...marriage has been decimated and now on it's deathbed as the bedrock of civilization.

We now have more incarcerated citizens than any other country in the world.

On a fundamental level, we no longer have the same national character...the same set of shared moral values...the social contract of society has been re-written and re-vised to the point at which the prevailing mindset embraces the complete overthrow of Judeo-Christian morality it was once based upon: everything that was once good is now bad, and everything that was once bad is now good.

And this is why I do not dismiss the predictions of the end of the US as crazy conspiracy theory that are just the ravings of paranoid lunatics.

The former KGB analyst that made his predictions of the end of the US, Igor Panarin, made the following points as to why the US is headed for dissolution:

Mr. Panarin posits, in brief, that mass immigration, economic decline, and moral degradation will trigger a civil war next fall and the collapse of the dollar.

Much of the issues that we, the MRA blogosphere contemplate, ruminate and fulminate on, are all based on the moral degradation that Panarin notes. All it's gonna take is another "crisis" to move us ever closer to the end of the nation and the beginning of the One World Fascist Communitarian-based Government.

Since Obama's election, the American public has been stocking up on firearms and ammunition. I myself have been trying for months to buy .357 magnum for my Ruger ...but all of the stores here in Hawaii are sold out and have been since last year. Apparently the ammo manufacturer cannot make them fast enough.

Could the fact that this nation is armed to the teeth, and stockpiling as much as they can in the face of a crashing economy and the threat of a Swine Flu Pandemic be the reasoning behind the construction of FEMA camps across the nation? Why battle-tested in Iraq and Afghanistan divisions of the National Guard are brought home and preparing for civil unrest scenarios? It's simply reaching the point where it cannot be ignored. The government IS PREPARING FOR SOMETHING MOMENTOUS TO OCCUR IN THE NEAR FUTURE.

Many of you in the MRA/MGTOW/PUA blogosphere have readily recognized that our current society is unsustainable and certainly headed for a crash...yet most speak of this as if it were an abstract possibility...something that's not going to happen until much later down the road - so in the meantime, let's just go full bore hedonism and enjoy the ride while it lasts.

I certainly understand this mindset...but I'm now of the belief that the coming crash is much more likely to happen sooner than later. So while you sit back and try as best you can to enjoy the ride, at least do some preparation for the harder times that are definitely ahead.

Work on the three G's. Practice your target shooting with your firearms. Train in a martial art so that you have the tools to defend yourself. Plant a garden, try and acquire any kind of livestock. Prepare to be able to have food should civil order breakdown and the grocery store shelves are cleared out with no other supplies coming in. Store bottled water.

Better to prepare for something that doesn't happen rather than have something happen and not be prepared.

Prepare yourself folks, for the worst is yet to come.

Thursday, September 3, 2009

MRA - Men's Rights AWARENESS

Many bloggers and other columnists and pundits like Glenn Sacks use the term MRA to mean Men's Rights Activists.

When I use the acronym MRA, I however mean something different...Men's Rights AWARENESS.

I don't believe "Activism" -- in the sense of fomenting a grass roots movement to build a groundswell of support to institute legal and cultural changes -- is ever going to realistically solve the problems many MRA/MGTOW bloggers have been writing about for years now. The feminist zeitgeist is too firmly entrenched into our mainstream culture...an inoperable cancer.

No, it is my firm contention that the only real and meaningful way in which the MRA blogosphere CAN effect real change, is on an individual level:


To raise awareness of the truth of the reality that we all live in.

To enable people to see things clearly, so that when they make goals and try to direct their lives towards achieving them, they do so knowing the full score so they can avoid many of the pitfalls our BraveNewWorldOrder has created to entrap us all in our deliberately distorted and contorted understanding of the gender roles and how they affect our lives.

MRA/MGTOW blogs gave me a complete understanding of just what the hell is going on in the system; the injustices of the divorce court industry and the true affect the feminist movement has had in socially engineering our modern dystopia.

PUA blogs gave me an understanding of the basic, primal nature of male/female gender roles.

Talleyrand at Seasons of Tumult and Discord wrote a post that perfectly encapsulates the essence of all the postings I have contributed at Roissy's with regards to "game" in a LTR/Marriage.

It is very well know what men find generally attractive in women: youth, health, and beauty. Despite attempts by our current tyrannical society (and it is tyrannical, it wants to so totally control the way people think while speaking in Orwellian terms of tolerance and inclusiveness) to repress men, this fact remains.

It is not well known what women are attracted to. There may be comments about them marrying up, or gold digging, but these just skim on the surface of reality. Men shy away from what women are attracted to because of the ugly truths found there.

Without a complete understanding of what attracts women, a man cannot guard against the Cads out there that will poach his mate. If he believes her words, and not her nature, he will lose. If he understands what drives his wife, or girlfriend, he can defend against the real threats that the naturals and the seducers pose.

Further, he can incorporate what attracts his wife into his own behavior to maintain her attraction to him. A wife that is attracted to her husband, is a wife that will love him. If she is not attracted to him, she will not love him and will hold him in contempt.

Learning what attracts a woman, does not mean becoming a serial seducer, anymore than the fact that a woman wearing makeup makes her promiscuous. A woman does specific things to make a man attracted to her. She spends time doing it.

As is so often pointed out in popular culture, a relationship takes work, yet so many men think that simply being themselves should be enough or they waste their energies doing the things that society says are romantic and expected of them. If men took all that time and money trying to buy a woman’s affection and instead used it to actually attract her both individuals would be happier.

A woman that is attracted to her partner, is a woman that stays married.

Well stated, Talleyrand...

...but I would also add a crucial point here: "game" also teaches men not only what behaviors attract women...but what behaviors also KILL attraction. Behaviors that she may not even be consciously aware of...nevertheless, I am convinced, become the basis for "I'm just not happy anymore" or "I just can't do this anymore" or "I'm not in love with you anymore," which in turn, of course, contributes to the modern American woman filing for divorce in the range of 70+ %.

Oh, and thanks to Alkibiades for commenting on my last posting, which lead me to finding your excellent blog.

To continue....I believe with the advent of the "Roissysphere," I think we are now witnessing a new phase in MRA...a merging of the two spheres - "game" theory and MRA into a cohesive and complete understanding of how unnatural our current socially engineered gender roles has played into the social decay and decline of civilization we are all currently living through.

These guys "get it" and have all taken the community discussions at Roissy's and generated a raft of interesting blogfodder to add to the debate in the MRA/PUA community. One of the most fascinating discussions has been the "Bio-cons" vs. the "So-cons" debate that was sparked by a few right wing, religious conservatives and their negative views and denunciations of "Game."

I tried my bit in that debate by commenting over at Anakin Niceguy's blog, but I failed to overcome his objections and point of view that Game is inherently bad and morally corrupt. While I disagree with him, I still find his blog to be a pretty good representation of how MGTOW is a more than justified approach to dealing with our modern feminist contorted cultural zeitgeist.

I believe this convergence of MRA/PUA blogs actually gives men a very real alternative to MGTOW.

To reiterate, I don't fault MGTOW for choosing to forsake relationships with women under the current cultural paradigm. But some MGTOW have steadfastly held to the idea that successful relationships with women is next to impossible. I don't believe so. If you DO want a wife and children so that you can create your own legacy through procreation, you DO have the resources to help guide you in giving you the best chance at building a successful marriage and family with a woman worthy of what is certainly a risky venture in today's BraveNewWorldOrder.

In closing, I'd like to recognize many of the "Roissysphere" blogs, such as In Mala Fide, Gucci Little Piggy, Novaseeker, Whiskey, Thursday, Dusk in Autumn, Welmer, The Beta Revolution, Alpha-Status,and Gantsquarry. They have all contributed their share of excellent insights into the overall debate of what I term the Men's Right's Awareness philosophy. I've been reading all of these aforementioned blogs for awhile now, and am glad to see a literal upwelling in the number of MRA focused blogs that have come out of the community of the increasingly popular comment section at Roissy's.

I also look forward to some of the more insightful Roissyshpere commenters like Obsidian and The Fifth Horsemen (Tood) either creating their own blogs or continuing to contribute to the comment sections of everyone else's blogs.

Keep up the good work, Men!

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Everything that is wrong in the world today...

...can be seen at the checkout stand of the any grocery store.

This thought came to my mind as I was stuck in a long line buying groceries yesterday with nothing to do but look at the garbage the retailer hopes you will impulsively decide to buy because something titillates you or sparks your interest as your waiting your turn to pay for your goods.

Of course, the most prominent item for sale is the female-centric periodicals...

Thanks to a 10 minute wait to pay for my groceries, I have now learned more about the sex lives and relationship status of people like John and Kate and Brad and Angelina than I ever thought I'd want to. I also learned that women can employ 50 sex techniques that will drive men wild.

Looking at the selection of women's mags at the checkout stand and the content of the fare they are offering for consumption is akin to peering into the mind of a neurotic obsessive compulsive, materialistic narcissist...which certainly describes the mental state of plenty of women nowadays, no?

But the biggest irony? Almost all of the magazine covers I looked at had headlines like "How to lose that extra 10 lbs. before the holidays!" or "5 new exercises to get rid of those love handles!"

These magazines are located directly across from yet another phenomena that is certainly a big factor in what is so wrong in today's society...

I was particularly appalled as I witnessed a manifestation of a typical denizen of our Brave New World Order in the checkout stand next to mine: an obese, late 20's/early 30's Mother with three kids, (of which one obviously had a different sperm donor than the other two), dressed as an inappropriate skank, intently studying one of the celebrity gossip mags while her bastard malcontents were raising havoc in their no-doubt sugar-induced hyperactivity. As her turn came up to checkout, she threw the magazine down for purchase as she unloaded her wagon's contents onto the conveyor belt. Her kids began whining and begging for various assortments of sugar fixes, to which she with a great show of impatient irritation told them to grab their fixes just so they'd shut up for a moment.

She than had to separate the kid's sugar fixes and celeb-u-tard gossip rag from the rest of the groceries, because (of course) she whipped out her EBT Card to cover most of her shopping cart's contents. Oh the irony.

The Federal Government replaced the old food stamps with the new EBT cards so as to eliminate the shame of having to use easily distinguishable food stamps.

Yet this disgusting specimen of the welfare state matriarchy who was wearing clothing that revealed far too many details about her body that no normal man would ever consider attractive...walking around dressed like THAT...yet she's supposed to be protected from the potential shaming of having to use food stamps?!?

This is similar to what she looked like...

...except the halter top was more revealing and her shorts were short enough to show off her rolls of cellulite and stretch marks. Add in a stretched out and faded tramp stamp on her lower back, a faded tattoo on her shoulder blade, and some hair that looked utterly damaged from too many chemical highlights and color changes, throw in some jewelry and overly done makeup, and you'll get the picture.

This is the sort of person we need to spare the public indignity of having to use food stamps? She has no sense of dignity and shame to begin with!

And, of course, she was but one of the many, many observable specimens of sheeple...the product of our BraveNewWorldOrder's matriarchal welfare state that I could see grazing through the aisles of my local grocery store.

I have never been more pessimistic and cynical about the direction our society is headed in, than I was yesterday at the grocery store.