Friday, March 27, 2009

Understanding the Hegelian Dialectic - A Social Engineering Tool

Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
Inspiration for Marx & Engels in Developing Communist Ideology

As discussed on this blog and other sites that have traced the roots of feminism to the New World Order, the power elite's favorite tool for social engineering and building up the legislation to accomplish the usurping of the U.S. Constitution to move us ever closer to one world Governance is the Hegelian Dialectic.

It took me a little while, after much intensive reading on the topic, to come to a full understanding of what German Humanist philosopher and social engineer Hegel termed the Dialectic.

The basic equation of thesis + anti-thesis = synthesis was a bit puzzling for me to understand at first.

But I once read a lady (I forget now where I found her article, but her explanation was memorable) who explained it in layman's terms: she once combined her husband's white laundry load with her daughters red shirt in the washing machine. The result was pink socks and underwear and a bleached out red shirt. Her husband and daughter were so angry they demanded she never wash their laundry again.

Now if the stated goal were true - that mom was to do the families laundry correctly - she failed miserably. But, if her REAL goal was to combine the two so that her family would be so angry, they would do their own laundry from then on, than her real goal was be free from that particular chore!

white clothes (thesis) + red shirt (anti-thesis) = Mom doesn't do laundry anymore (synthesis)

The key to the Hegelian Dialectic's success is that one, two or all three parts of the equation must have a little bit of truth mixed in with deliberate falsehood to accomplish the hidden agenda.

In this example, the deliberate deception is in the synthesis - that Mom was trying to do the laundry to clean her families clothes.

Now apply the same equation to any number of the Feminist-wrought changes to laws and society, and you can see just how effective the Dialectic is at changing society over time.

Abusive Husbands and Fathers (thesis) + No-Fault Divorce Laws (Anti-thesis) = Rise in Divorce (Synthesis)

The deception, of course is that the thesis is false: SOME men are abusive...but the anti-thesis is applied to ALL men to create the we all know, more than 3/4ths of all divorces are initiated by women, with the majority of them not involving any kind of substantive abuse!

While the stated goal was to save women from abusive spouses, the real goal...the dissolution of marriage as the building block of society, and the effort to create more dependent wards of the State, was certainly accomplished.

While the synthesis is presented as the solution to the original problem, it more often than not results in a whole slew of new problems to which the dialectic can be applied over and over again.

So, with the rise of broken homes due to no-fault divorce, we apply the dialectic again. It is statistically undeniable that single mother households are far more likely to produce the next generation of criminals.

Proliferation of Criminals (thesis) + Police State (anti-thesis) = World's Highest Incarceration Rate (synthesis)

Of course, this particular example gives us that dubious distinction of the country that incarcerates the highest percentage of it's own population, if one is aware of how the Dialectic is used, it's quite obvious that if one were to truly try and address the problem of the proliferation of criminals, instead of empowering the justice system to the point of becoming an Orwellian police state, one could address the thesis by reducing the number of single mother households - the single biggest common denominator amongst the criminal class!

But than the power elites wouldn't have their excuse to build up the Orwellian Police State and vastly profitable Industrial Prison Complex, now would it?

Keeping all that in mind, I now offer the latest iteration of the Dialectic to advance another goal of the New World Order: Disarmament of the Population.

Who Is Arming the Mexican Drug Cartels?

The state, Mexican authorities and their US propaganda arm, known in most circles as the Mainstream Media, have recently embarked on a huge disinformation campaign to demonize the American gun owner as the supplier of weapons to the Mexican drug cartels. Everyone in the media, with the possible exception of Lou Dobbs, has joined in the campaign of lies.

The Hegelian Dialectic REQUIRES lies to be promulgated profusely, and accepted by the majority to realize it's intended social engineering.

This week, Secretary of Homeland Defense, Janet Napolitano, announced a new plan to curb the alleged flow of weapons from the US into Mexico. This program, which will cost the overwhelmed US Taxpayer another 700 million dollars plus, includes machines that employ what is referred to as "virtual strip search." This plan will supposedly slow down the number of guns traveling south from the US to the drug cartels in Mexico.

Gun Battle Chaos in Mexico from US guns (thesis) + Intrusive Strip search machines (anti-thesis) = Lucrative Contract for machine manufacturer and a new tool in implementing the NWO Orwellian Police State (synthesis)

Of course, the dialectical deception here is implying that the Mexican drug cartels are buying their guns from the average US gun owner.

If this program has the same success rate as the government’s efforts at stopping the flow of contraband north into the US, the Mexican drug cartels will have nuclear weapons by the end of April!

The author points out the absurdity here to make the point: of COURSE the real goal is not to "stop the flow of guns to mexico from the US." That's the dialectical deception to achieve the real goal!

However the real goal is not just to fund the installment of intrusive machinery on American's crossing the border...but the ultimate disarmament of the average citizen.

Using the Hegelian Dialectic to overturn the 2nd Amendment!

Napolitano stated, "70% of the weapons in the hands of the drug cartels are coming from the US." The implication is obvious she is referring to private gun owners. The MSM sucks up this propaganda like a large-mouth bass takes a worm, and regurgitates it to Boobus without ever questioning the truthfulness behind the claim. Neither Mexican, nor US officials, has ever produced an ounce of proof to back up these wild accusations.

Shown here, on a CBS special, is video proof of the lies and disinformation by CBS, US and Mexican authorities. Anderson Cooper and Janet Napolitano are either ignorant or complicit in the myth that M-203s, RPGs and hand grenades are readily available to the American gun consumer. Most intelligent folks, and those without a state sponsored agenda, realize these weapons are usually only available to the military.

Of course, it's quite obvious that the mainstream media is the number one apparatus for promoting dialectical deceptions.

Wednesday, on MSNBC, in an interview by Andrea Mitchell, New York Congressional Representative, Nita Lowey stated 97% of the guns in the hands of the Mexican drug cartels originated in the US. Representative Lowey, in her support for a new Assault Weapons Ban, alleges these firearms are coming from the American gun owner. She is correct in her assertion many of the firearms being used by the cartels are coming from Americans. They are, but, from the American taxpayer, not the American gun owner!

The fact is: the Mexican authorities have refused to release the serial numbers of weapons confiscated from drug cartel members. Releasing the serial numbers would implicate the corrupt governments of the US and Mexico and their involvement in arming the drug cartels.

Considering the above, it is my belief the Mexican drug cartels are procuring a large percentage of weapons from the world’s largest supplier of these weapons: the United States government!

The United States Government is corrupt?!? You don't say?

The type of weapons confiscated and the unwillingness of those involved to supply weapon serial numbers is a clear indicator.

Because of the "narco-wars," the US government supplies the Mexican military with arms and training. The Mexican military has trained at Ft. Bragg, North Carolina, and the arms budget from the US to Mexico is in the billions.

Drug profits realized from the sale of drugs in the US by Mexico’s violent drug cartels are estimated to be as high as 40 billion dollars per year. With that amount of money, is there any question as to the ability of the cartels to purchase military weapons provided by the United States government from corrupt Mexican government officials and members of their military?

Our government is certainly aware of the rampant corruption within the Mexican government and military, yet we continue to provide them with money, military weapons and training, including all of the military weapons mentioned earlier in this article and shown in film clips by the mainstream media as proof positive we need a new Assault Weapons Ban. (AWB)

Isn't it all so obvious now?

Mexican Gun Violence comes from Us Guns (thesis) + Assault Weapons Ban Legislation (Anti-thesis) = Disarmed US Populace - 2nd Amendment nullified, the NWO desired synthesis!

Or as the author put's it:

Our corrupt government, cooperating with Mexico’s equally corrupt government, has embarked on a campaign to deprive American citizens of the means to defend ourselves from tyranny, screening their own involvement in arming violent criminal drug cartels. We can weakly submit, or stand for truth and liberty; the choice is ours.

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Ammunition Accountability Act

The latest example of Big Business using the power of the Corporatist Fascist State Government to pass laws that result in Government-coerced profitability for the lobbyists paying for that influence?

The corporate entity and government officials behind this latest effort:

The Ammunition Accountability Act

Notice the ".com" domain...pushing for official legislation in 18 states.

The developer of ammunition identification technology is attempting to use the power of the government to FORCE all ammunition manufacturer's to adopt their technology. They will also sell their database hardware/software to any states that adopt the legislation they are promoting (most likely in a non-bid, over-budget, highly lucrative contract from State's general budget coffers...i.e. the taxpayers).

I haven't read all the State's variations on the legislation, but in Hawaii's proposals, they are pushing for ALL CITIZENS to surrender all ammunition produced before the passage of this law! Than we can only buy back ammunition that has been serialized...and we have to pay a 5% on every single round! They also collect a host of personal info to put in the database for future reference by Big Brother.

And, of course, all this legislation is based on this notion of "helping" we the sheeple!

Ammunition Accountability is a newly forming group of ammunition coding technology supporters. Our group includes gun crime victims, industry representatives, law enforcement, public officials, public policy experts, and more. We are working together to pass legislation to make ammunition coding technology a reality.

Translation: Ammunition Accountability is a newly forming group of ammunition coding technology supporters who plan to make a fortune creating and selling the tools necessary for your State Governments to help implement the Orwellian Police State. Ammunition manufacturers will have no choice but to pay the extra costs associated with our program while we rake in the $$$$$ selling our technology to the States that are dumb enough to support their legislators in passing this affront to the Second Amendment!!!!

Ammunition coding technology works by laser etching the back of each bullet with an alpha-numeric serial number. Then when a potential criminal purchases a box of 9mm cartridges, the box of ammunition and the bullets’ coding numbers would be connected to the purchaser in a statewide database. When a bullet is found at a crime scene, the code on the bullet can be read with a simple magnifying glass and then be run through a statewide database to determine who purchased the ammunition and where, providing a valuable investigative lead. now a person could easily frame another by stealing their ammo and using it in a crime!

Or what if you dropped a round by accident while you were at the firing range? Somebody could pick it up and use it in a crime...and YOU go to jail!

Ahh well.

Just another example of Hope and Change that we can believe in.

Welcome to the United Corporations of Fascist of the Fee and Home of the Debt Slave!

Monday, March 23, 2009

A Woman's Nation

We've already had a Black President before Barack Obama was inaugurated...Bill Clinton.

Years ago, in the middle of the Whitewater investigation, one heard the first murmurs: white skin notwithstanding, this is our first black President. Blacker than any actual black person who could ever be elected in our children’s lifetime. After all, Clinton displays almost every trope of blackness: single-parent household, born poor, working-class, saxophone-playing, McDonald’s-and-junk-food-loving boy from Arkansas.

But that doesn't mean Barak Obama is not the "HISTORICAL" President the news media and libtard progressives all singing his hosannas say he is...

...he is our Nation's first Mangina President.

Obama Creates Woman's Panel

Obama, standing with prominent members of his administration and with his wife sitting nearby, signed an executive order creating an across-the-government council designed to help Cabinet agencies and departments collaborate on ways to make sure women were provided opportunities offered to men.

Ah...I'm sure they'll be getting started right away on making sure women achieve equality on these kind of career opportunities post-haste! (Don't hold your breath.)

The National Women's Law Center applauded the move but added more needed to be done. California first lady Maria Shriver, who is working with the Center for American Progress on a report on women's issues, said the move was a reminder that "we are now what I like to call 'a woman's nation.'"

The United States of America is dead.

Long live the United State of Matriarchal Hegemony.

Friday, March 20, 2009

Taxed Enough Already

From National TEA Party Day

On April 15, be part of the Taxed Enough Already (TEA) party rally in your community

On the day you pay your taxes, Wednesday, April 15, join others across the country and in your hometown who will be participating in TEA party rallies in front of their city halls. The TEA party rally will begin at 12 noon.

Are you fed up with a Congress and a president who:

* vote for a $500 billion tax bill without even reading it?
* are spending trillions of borrowed dollars, leaving a debt our great-grandchildren will be paying?
* consistently give special interest groups billions of dollars in earmarks to help get themselves re-elected?
* want to take your wealth and redistribute it to others?
* punish those who practice responsible financial behavior and reward those who do not?
* admit to using the financial hurt of millions as an opportunity to push their political agenda?
* run up trillions of dollars of debt and then sell that debt to countries such as China?
* want government controlled health care?
* want to take away the right to vote with a secret ballot in union elections?
* refuse to stop the flow of millions of illegal immigrants into our country?
* appoint a defender of child pornography to the Number 2 position in the Justice Department?
* want to force doctors and other medical workers to perform abortions against their will?
* want to impose a carbon tax on your electricity, gas and home heating fuels?
* want to reduce your tax deductibility for charitable gifts?
* take money from your family budget to pay for their federal budget?

If so, participate in the TEA party rally, the Taxed Enough Already (TEA) party.

Bring your cell phone and call Congress and the president while attending the TEA party rally (Representative and Senators, 202-224-3121; President, 202-456-1414). Tell Every American about this effort by forwarding this invitation to your friends. Together we can make a difference.

See this video - the momentum is growing!

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

"The Owners"

One of George Carlin's last comedy routines...

I remember seeing this before.

I laughed along with the audience all along, the first time I saw it.

I just watched it again today...with a new understanding. Now I know EXACTLY what he's talking about.

I'm no longer laughing.

It's really not funny.

Friday, March 13, 2009

Home Sweet Home

Yeah, I haven't been posting much...still struggling as a debt slave in our Brave New World Order and Obama's changing economy...

...but I've still been thinking a lot about all the MRA related issues; the gender war, the decline of Western Civilization and all the other topics for which my eyes have been opened to in the last couple of years.

There's a lot of time to think when you're driving in traffic to and from the office.

One topic I've been thinking quite a bit though is this:

IF you do take that incredible risk in today's crazy system, and you do get married...the quality of your wife will determine the quality of your home.

She literally and figuratively BECOMES your home.

Because if she's a loving, thoughtful, kind and giving person, who cares about what you think and what you have to say, and is not intent on chattering your ear off as if you were one of her gossipy girlfriends the minute you walk in the door, and who tends the domestic chores and fills your kitchen up with wonderful smells of the forthcoming meals you savor, you cannot WAIT to get home every day.

But if she's a shrill, shrieking shrew that nags you the minute you get in the door, demands you "share the domestic load equally!" and withholds sex as a means of manipulating you, "Home" doesn't have the same ring to

These thoughts came to me when I overheard a few woman at lunch the other day at a restaurant here in Downtown Honolulu. They were discussing the divorce one of them was in the middle of going through.

"He's such a Workaholic!"

Oh how I am sick of hearing that particular complaint from bitchy women!

I felt like leaning over and saying the following to her:

"Your husband is a workaholic because he'd rather be working late (or having an affair, or drinking himself silly with his friends) than come home to the environment you've created there! No women who knows how to treat her man will EVER be whining to her girlfriends that her husband is a "workaholic!"

A happy, pleasant wife who shows her love to her husband will have no problem making sure her husband WANTS to get out of the office or away from his work-site as soon as he possibly can, every single day to get home to the SANCTUARY you create for him!

If he doesn't come home all the time...take a look in the mirror and be honest with yourself: Would you want to come home to you?"

Friday, March 6, 2009

Dialectical Contradictions

One of my favorite political humor sites is The People's Cube - a humorous satire that points out all the various levels of socialism inherent in the liberal/Democrat/Progressive platform by comparing them to the old Soviet Union regime's propaganda and imagery.

While most of the articles and blog entries are satirical in nature, there was actually a serious-toned article written by one of their contributors from a Russian immigrant to America who discussed the dialectical contradictions of the Soviet Communist Regime...and how he came to America and sees the same sort of dialectical contradictions here. From the article

Contradictions of Socialism (I saw the future & ran away)

There was a time in recent American history when certain Soviet jokes didn't work in translation - not so much because of the language differences, but because of the lack of common sociopolitical context. But that is changing. As President Obama is preparing us for a great leap towards collectivism, I find myself recollecting forgotten political jokes I shared with comrades while living in the old country under Brezhnev, Andropov, and Gorbachev. (I was too young to remember the Khrushchev times, but I remember the Khrushchev jokes.) I also noticed that the further America "advances" back to the Soviet model, the more translatable the old Soviet jokes become. ~

Not all Soviet advancements have metastasized here yet, but we have four more glorious years to make it happen.

Here is the old joke that he recalled from his life in the old Soviet Empire:

The six dialectical contradictions of socialism in the USSR:

  • There is full employment - yet no one is working.
  • No one is working - yet the factory quotas are fulfilled.
  • The factory quotas are fulfilled - yet the stores have nothing to sell.
  • The stores have nothing to sell - yet people got all the stuff at home.
  • People got all the stuff at home - yet everyone is complaining.
  • Everyone is complaining - yet the voting is always unanimous.

Here's his explanation of dialectical contributions...which is what we NWO conspiracy theorists with tin foil hats firmly planted on our heads recognize as the Hegelian Dialectic...the old "thesis + antithesis = synthesis"

Dialectical contradictions are one of the pillars in Marxist philosophy, which states that contradictions eventually lead to a unity of opposites as the result of a struggle. This gave a convenient "scientific" excuse for the existence of contradictions in a socialist society, where opposites were nice and agreeable - unlike the wild and crazy opposites of capitalism that could never be reconciled. Hence the joke.

Except it's really not that funny when you really think about it. Especially when you consider his recognition of the dialectical contradictions he sees in America that parallel his observations of life in the USSR...

When I moved to America, where wild and crazy opposites of capitalism were supposedly at their worst. Until recently, however, the only contradictions that struck me as irreconcilable were these:

Economic justice:

  • America is capitalist and greedy - yet half of the population is subsidized.
  • Half of the population is subsidized - yet they think they are victims.
  • They think they are victims - yet their representatives run the government.
  • Their representatives run the government - yet the poor keep getting poorer.
  • The poor keep getting poorer - yet they have things that people in other countries only dream about.
  • They have things that people in other countries only dream about - yet they want America to be more like those other countries.

Hollywood cliches:

  • Without capitalism there'd be no Hollywood - yet filmmakers hate capitalism.
  • Filmmakers hate capitalism - yet they sue for unauthorized copying of their movies.
  • They sue for unauthorized copying - yet on screen they teach us to share.
  • On screen they teach us to share - yet they keep their millions to themselves.
  • They keep their millions to themselves - yet they revel in stories of American misery and depravity.
  • They revel in stories of American misery and depravity - yet they blame the resulting anti-American sentiment on conservatism.
  • They blame the anti-American sentiment on conservatism - yet conservatism ensures the continuation of a system that makes Hollywood possible.

I never thought I would see socialist contradictions in America, let alone write about them. But somehow all attempts to organize life according to "progressive" principles always result in such contradictions. And in the areas where "progressives" have assumed positions of leadership - education, news media, or the entertainment industry - contradictions become "historically inevitable."

If one were accidentally to open his eyes and compare the "progressive" narrative with facts on the ground, one might start asking questions.


Here are a few more select dialectical contradictions he lists --

People's power:

  • Liberals believe they're advancing people's power - yet they don't believe people can do anything right without their guidance.
  • People can't do anything right - yet the government bureaucracy can do everything.
  • The government bureaucracy can do everything - yet liberals don't like it when the government takes control of their lives.
  • Liberals don't like it when the government takes control of their lives - yet they vote for programs that increase people's dependency on the government.
  • They vote for programs that increase people's dependency on the government - yet they believe they're advancing people's power.
Public education:
  • Liberals have been in charge of education for 50 years - yet education is out of control.
  • Education is out of control - yet liberal teaching methods prevail.
  • Liberal teaching methods prevail - yet public schools are failing.
  • Public schools are failing - yet their funding keeps growing.
  • Their funding keeps growing - yet public schools are always underfunded.
  • Public schools are always underfunded - yet private schools yield better results for less.
  • Private schools yield better results for less - yet public education is the only way out of the crisis.
Liberals and taxes:
  • Liberals want to help the poor - yet they won't give money to charities.
  • They won't give money to charities - yet they'd like the government to become a gigantic charity.
  • They'd like the government to become a gigantic charity - yet the money has to be taken from people by force.
  • The money has to be taken from people by force - yet they call it welfare.
  • They call it welfare - yet higher taxes make everyone poorer.
  • Higher taxes make everyone poorer - yet liberals find ways not to pay taxes.
  • Liberals find ways not to pay taxes - yet they get to be chosen to run the government.
Love and marriage:
  • Sex differences are the result of social conditioning - yet homosexuality is biological.
  • Homosexuality is biological - yet everybody is encouraged to experiment with it.
  • Everybody is encouraged to experiment with it - yet venereal diseases are treated at the taxpayers' expense.
  • Venereal diseases are treated at the taxpayers' expense - yet taxpayers have no right to impose standards since there are no moral absolutes.
  • There are no moral absolutes - yet gay marriage is an absolute must.
  • Gay marriage is an absolute must - yet family is an antiquated tool of bourgeois oppression.

The one criticisim I have of RedSquare is that it is a GOP-sympathizing, pro-War, pro-Compassionate conservative. While I love a good skewering of the Feminazi's and the sympathizing, emasculated manginas that make up the Demo-lib-progessive party, the failure to note the dialectical contradictions of the Republicans is a huge ideological blind spot for Red Square...they are unaware that they are playing their own role in implementing the Hegelian Dialectic of Republican + Democrat = NWO.

But they're still funny as hell!

Some MRA related dialectical contradictions:

Can you think of anymore?

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

An Introduction to Economic Reasoning

Given the hard economic times we are enduring, and the Obama's administrations plans that are most assuredly going to lead us from recession into depression, it's important that people have a clear understanding of the truth of the economic ideas that are being used to justify Obama's malfeasance and how and why we are where we are today.

Austrian Econmist and author, Tom Woods, just released a book entitled Meltdown: A Free-Market Look at Why the Stock Market Collapsed, the Economy Tanked, and Government Bailouts Will Make Things Worse

He began writing this book last year while Bush was still the President. He He, like all the other economists that study Austrian Economic Theories were predicting the current mess, quite accurately, years ago. He wanted his book to be completed and in print and circulation just as the shit hit the fan and the administration would start talking about economics to justify the expansion of government's scope and power.

The Austrian school of economics is also the primary source for Ron Paul's platform as a Congressmen and during his Presidential Candidacy.

So Woods has been doing the usual author of a brand new book thing, and been doing interviews, writing articles and such to get the word out on his book.

One of the sites he's been promoting his book is a place called Campaign For Liberty

At campaign for liberty, Woods offers three free, online links to books that go into further detail on the Austrian Economics School of thought on the current crisis, the solutions that would work, and the problems that are going to develop.

An Introduction to Economic Reasoning

These three books, all relatively short and available online or for purchase, are an excellent starting point for an education in sound economics.

Economics in One Lesson by Henry Hazlitt;
Essentials of Economics by Faustino Ballve;
An Introduction to Austrian Economics by Thomas C. Taylor

Obama and the Democrats who have the actual power to address the problems, are all most assuredly not going to follow the Austrian Economics Principles...because they are definitely more concerned with grabbing and consolidating more power in the leviathan of the Federal Government...and they are going to deliberately take this country into a Depression to do it.