Monday, July 30, 2007

Patriarchy > Matriarchy

The roots of feminism have penetrated so deeply into the soil of Western society, it seems at times that the Patriarchal system that gave us the most prosperous civilization in human history is already lost. How can one combat what has become mainstream, conventional wisdom that is commonly accepted by 99% of the population?

The following are two articles that are seeking to address the problems of entitlement programs (i.e. socialism) being funded by the current work force's taxes, and the declining birthrates throughout the entire Western world. Notice how both authors fail to connect the dots with regards to feminism's radical altering of society and the results they engender:

The Cry Should Go Up in Europe: More Babies, Please!

Are Children a Public Good?

Both article recognize the problem and that inevitably the systems of socialist entitlement will no longer work as the baby boomer generation ages and their entitlement benefits are greater than the money being collected from the smaller generations of workers.

The problems are two-fold: the war on the nuclear family, and the idea that Government is the solution to the problem...when in fact it is Government that has caused all these problems to begin with! Or more accurately...Government corrupted by the Tyranny of the Petticoat, a.k.a. Feminism.

At a time when we – I mean, anyone over 35 – are all horribly conscious that there won’t be enough taxpayers to support us in gin and cigarettes in our old age, the very last thing we need to worry about is excess population growth. On the contrary: as seen from the dinner party circuit, the real crisis is the difficulty for female graduates in getting anyone to breed with. Forty per cent of women graduates don’t have a single baby at the age of 35.

Funny, isn't it? The pro-Socialists worked tirelessly to make the masses in the West accept government entitlement programs...and often times, these were the same people that supported and promoted the modern feminist zeitgeist that all women should attend college and build careers instead of marrying young and raising families. In effect, the people behind the current state of affairs, built a house of cards in their entitlement system of retirement, and the foundation was rooted in the next generation's taxes...but their promotion of feminist ideals also resulted in birth rates that simply don't provide enough workers to sustain the system they set up!

The pertinent question is, was this done on purpose...or are the pro-socialist/pro-feminists just that stupid? Useful idiots, indeed.

As MRA blogger No Ma'am chronicles, the brilliantly conceived cultural assault on the West promulgated by the Frankfurt School masterminds exploited women and feminists as the ideal useful idiots to destroy the West from within.

To those of us that see the bigger picture, it all adds up perfectly, doesn't it? Connect the dots...

1) Give women the right to short order, the focus of government as a limited entity that exists to maintain freedom for the citizenry is turned into a nanny state behemoth by women voters that value security over liberty. John Adams was right to oppose women's suffrage, as we now see just how the Tyranny of the Petticoat is the antithesis to freedom.

2) Promote the destruction of the nuclear family - change marital laws so that women have incentives to leave the fathers of their children and live off of the public sector if they are poor, or force the father through government coercion to subsidize the destruction of his family.

3) Push women into the workforce and encourage them to avoid getting married and having children until they have built a career...when they are past their prime years of fertility and are only able to have one or two children at most, and then have day care and Government propaganda institutions (a.k.a. public schools) raise them while she seeks "validation" in the world of work.

4) When the entitlement programs face pending insolvency because there are not enough workers to pay for the promised entitlements, import a foreign born workforce.

5) Encourage these foreign born workers to avoid assimilation. Any attempts to stop illegal immigration or to promote the idea that newcomers to the West should assimilate is branded "racism."

Yet the author of the column can write about this agenda's implementation while failing to connect the dots:

Don’t they realise that there are only two classes in Britain for whom three or more children are an option – the rich, for whom mortgages don’t matter, and the poor, whose children are supported by the benefit system? The increase in the birth rate this year was largely accounted for by immigrants and older, richer mothers. One reason why there's such resentment – articulated by the Labour minister Margaret Hodge – among white working-class Britons about asylum-seekers with children getting social housing ahead of them is that the system seems to discriminate against couples who postpone having children until they can afford them in favour of ethnic minority communities with large families.
Seems to? It DOES. This is done by design! The Cultural Marxists plans are being effected to perfection!

Thus, the cultural building blocks of civilized society have been compromised. The first attack was disrupting the nuclear family structure that transmit the cultural values of preceding generations. Women are encouraged to be selfish and pursue material gains and power instead of nurturing children - this is called "empowerment" and "equality."

Import a foreign born working class to prop up the entitlement socialist schemes, and encourage them to balkanize themselves and avoid assimilation at all costs (If you would like to proceed in English, press 1; Para proceder en español, prensa 2...).

As the cultural disarray continues, we are headed further and further down the path of Matriarchal oppression.

All of this can actually be expressed in a simple mathematical formula:

If Feminists = Useful Idiots, than: Cultural Marxists + Useful Idiots + Socialism + (Immigration - Assimilation) = The Decline of Western Civilization

It's time to return to the original equation that gave us the Cultural Society of Western Civilization...

Patriarchy > Matriarchy

Friday, July 27, 2007


This is a tribute to Fred X, The Eternal Bachelor & Captain Zarmband.

The Last Q&A w/ Fred X

I've had a lot of questions of late, and I thought I'd highlight this one, just to make it crystal clear what I stand for.


Fred, is the misogynist mens movement an extremist movement for elderly, right-wing, conservative anti-choicers? Just curious.

No we're not.

And speaking for myself, on this blog, the only thing extreme here is my language and the fact I call a femcunt by its rightful term.

I don't promote terrorism. I never have and I never will.

I want equality under the law and an end to misandry.

Also- I will always promote, and encourage, outspokenness, freedom of speech and frankness when talking about any subject.

I might not agree with everything people post- but it will never go censored.


Also- I don't call for violence, but I do call for protests and marches, and, where possible, media exposure.

There is nothing extreme about me, or about any blogger I link to.

The Men's Movement is a movement based on fairness and is just in its cause.

If people think I'm extreme, then they're confusing extreme language with extreme message.

My message is clear: men's rights are a cause every man must fight for.

To hell with any accusations that me, or the Men's Movement as a whole, are a bunch of 'old misogynists'.

Fuck that shit.

All men are effected: fathers, victims of DV, young guys who have been brought up with misandry etc etc.

Forget stereotypes of 'angry old conservatives'.

The Men's Movement is much more diverse than that.

In any case- I won't be explaining myself again after this- except to direct any critics to this article.

Or my arsehole, so I can fart in their faces.


Femcunts are pointless. posted by Fred X @ 11:18 PM

Before Anyone ever forgets...let us always remember the day Fred X had strived for us to always remember:

To whoever was responsible for censoring the Eternal Bachelor, Captain Zarmband and Fred X...

Never Get Busted Again

Although I was inspired to blog because of the MRA movement, I purposely chose the Blogger name, Hawaiian Libertarian, because I did not want to have to constrain myself to only blogging about MRA/anti-feminism issues. I am a registered Libertarian and I believe in most of their political platform - including the elimination of drug prohibition laws.

I oppose this simply because I believe the government should not have the power to tell individuals what substances they can or cannot consume, and that prohibition has created problems far worse for society than the problems associated with people who become addicted to a legal substance.

It really has nothing to do with the fact that I like to recreationally indulge every now and then with some of Hawaii's finest homegrown...

Anyhow, check this article out from Radar Online

Can't Bust This

Like drugs? An ex-narcotics agent reveals the secrets to staying one step ahead of the law

During his eight-year stint as a cop in Texas—two of them as head of narcotics for the Gladewater Police Department—Barry Cooper made over 800 drug-related arrests, impounded more than 50 vehicles, and seized at least $500,000 in cash and assets. He worked with everyone from the DEA to the FBI to border patrol, earning a reputation as the "best narcotics officer in the state, and perhaps the country," according to a former colleague. So what did Cooper, now married with four kids, learn from his experience?

"The war on drugs is an utterly losing proposition," he tells Radar. "We caused more harm breaking up families to put non-violent drug offenders in jail than the drugs ever did. And for what? To eradicate 1/10th of a percent of drugs on the street."

Cooper's epiphany stems in part from a few legal skirmishes of his own—he's been arrested five times (all non-drug-related offenses), though convicted only once, of a misdemeanor verbal assault charge. Plenty of cops lose faith in the system, but Cooper's 180 was so complete, he's now helping people to subvert it. Never Get Busted Again, in stores this September (or available now through his website), is a DVD compendium of advice for potheads looking to avoid the po-po, breezily narrated by the man formerly tasked with putting them behind bars. "I really just felt guilty about what I had done with my life," says Cooper. "This was the least I could do."

Because potheads have notoriously short attention spans, we asked Cooper to boil down his DVD into easy-to-read bullet points. Safe toking.

Read the whole thing...this former narc gives excellent advice - especially concerning beating drug-detecting dogs and how to interact with police if and when you are pulled over. Some of the things, I already knew...but some of it I didn't.

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

Back from Vacation

I haven't been online for over a week, as I was at a business seminar/working vaction in Las Vegas, and have only returned to my beautiful island home last night...and I've returned to find that now FredX has pulled the blog/archives disappearing act with nary an explanation like the other recent UK MRA Blogs!

This is indeed extremely fishy when one steps back and looks at just who has retired from MRA blogging in the past month...Eternal Bachelor, Captain Z and now FredX...the 3 highest profile MRA bloggers in the UK.


I don't think this is mere coincidence...something stinks, and I'm quite sure it has everything to do with the progression of the Nanny State in the UK and an effort to censor the bloggers that have been giving us dispatches from the heart of the feminist-controlled Matriarchy of the UK.

Hopefully we don't see similar efforts succeed in America...we are supposedly the land of the free and the home of the brave.

I for one will not give up blogging willingly...and if I did, I wouldn't simply delete my archives and leave some lame ass "due to personal reasons, I'm shutting this blog down" and that's it.

Thursday, July 12, 2007

Feminism is about power-hungry, ugly women.

For those of us that know better, the following article is just another example of yet another "No Shit Sherlock!" moment.

Women are the deciders, dominant ones in relationships, study finds

While feminists whined, nagged and bitched until their sisterhood let minimum wage workers raise their kids while being pushed into the workplace and making life miserable for everyone involved, one of their primary myths they promulgated was the fallacy that housewives did not have any power, and were simply domestic servants being ruthlessly exploited by the Patriarchy. Men made all the decisions and the Housewife just meekly accepted subservience. Even in the bad old days of the "Patriarchal 1950's" a lady like June Cleaver CERTAINLY had her influence over the family affairs.

The funny thing about that is the feminists that were complaining about this supposed state of affairs were actually embittered and angry that the NUMBER ONE WAY women have ALWAYS dominated men was the power of FEMININE influence...a power that most of the ugly hags that comprised the feminist leadership never had experience wielding successfully at all.

Imagine the following:

Hey there, my wonderful sexy husband! Me and the girlfriends want to go out on a girls night out. I know you don't like that, but I'll REALLY make it worth your while when I get home! I'll put on that sexy outfit you love so much and I'll do that thing with my tounge that you love so much... ...thanks honey! I can't wait to get home and show you how grateful I am!


Oh Honey, if we get that Mini-van I've always wanted, I'll be sure and show you just how many uses we can get out of laying down the back seats to make it into a bed....


Sweetheart, for our next family vacation, let's go to the Bahamas! I've ALWAYS wanted to go there...we could have a second honeymoon in such a romantic place! Just think of what we can do on a deserted beach under a full moon...


Rush Limbaugh was sort of right when he once said: "feminism was established so as to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream of society."

What would be more accurate would be to say "Feminism was established so that unattractive women would no longer have to seethe with jealousy and bitter rage when they see how easily attractive, beautiful women are able to manipulate men to get what they want, and realizing that they have no such power themselves."

Tuesday, July 10, 2007

Human Nature & Political Correctness

In truth, the following article encapsulates the core issue of the feminist movement and the vast cultural and legal changes they have effected in the past 30+ years... Ten Politically Incorrect Truths About Human Nature.

The implications of some of the ideas in this article may seem immoral, contrary to our ideals, or offensive. We state them because they are true, supported by documented scientific evidence. Like it or not, human nature is simply not politically correct.

In other words, Political Correctness = Denial of Reality. It's a fantasy world. This article, being one published by Psychology Today doesn't explicitly point out that much of the 10 "truths" they list, but ALL of them deal with aspects of the "gender war" started by the radical feminists that have infiltrated every level of culture and society.

Some of the "truths" are downright hilarious - because they directly contradict the so-called conventional wisdom fostered by feminism.

For example...

The midlife crisis is a myth—sort of

Many believe that men go through a midlife crisis when they are in middle age. Not quite. Many middle-aged men do go through midlife crises, but it's not because they are middle-aged. It's because their wives are. From the evolutionary psychological perspective, a man's midlife crisis is precipitated by his wife's imminent menopause and end of her reproductive career, and thus his renewed need to attract younger women. Accordingly, a 50-year-old man married to a 25-year-old woman would not go through a midlife crisis, while a 25-year-old man married to a 50-year-old woman would, just like a more typical 50-year-old man married to a 50-year-old woman. It's not his midlife that matters; it's hers. When he buys a shiny-red sports car, he's not trying to regain his youth; he's trying to attract young women to replace his menopausal wife by trumpeting his flash and cash.

No wonder women always talk about Men and their "mid-life crisis" they endlessly make snide remarks or demean or criticize any middle aged man that starts trying to "recapture youth." So middle aged ladies worried about their husbands or boyfriends, understand the true lie of political correctness and the conventional wisdom of a man's "midlife crisis:" it's not about "re-capturing" their's about capturing some current youth to replace YOU.

However, the authors of this article definitely saved the best for last:

Men sexually harass women because they are not sexist

An unfortunate consequence of the ever-growing number of women joining the labor force and working side by side with men is the increasing number of sexual harassment cases. Why must sexual harassment be a necessary consequence of the sexual integration of the workplace?

Psychologist Kingsley R. Browne identifies two types of sexual harassment cases: the quid pro quo ("You must sleep with me if you want to keep your job or be promoted") and the "hostile environment" (the workplace is deemed too sexualized for workers to feel safe and comfortable). While feminists and social scientists tend to explain sexual harassment in terms of "patriarchy" and other ideologies, Browne locates the ultimate cause of both types of sexual harassment in sex differences in mating strategies.

Studies demonstrate unequivocally that men are far more interested in short-term casual sex than women. In one now-classic study, 75 percent of undergraduate men approached by an attractive female stranger agreed to have sex with her; none of the women approached by an attractive male stranger did. Many men who would not date the stranger nonetheless agreed to have sex with her.

The quid pro quo types of harassment are manifestations of men's greater desire for short-term casual sex and their willingness to use any available means to achieve that goal. Feminists often claim that sexual harassment is "not about sex but about power;" Browne contends it is both—men using power to get sex. "To say that it is only about power makes no more sense than saying that bank robbery is only about guns, not about money."

Sexual harassment cases of the hostile-environment variety result from sex differences in what men and women perceive as "overly sexual" or "hostile" behavior. Many women legitimately complain that they have been subjected to abusive, intimidating, and degrading treatment by their male coworkers. Browne points out that long before women entered the labor force, men subjected each other to such abusive, intimidating, and degrading treatment.

Abuse, intimidation, and degradation are all part of men's repertoire of tactics employed in competitive situations. In other words, men are not treating women differently from men—the definition of discrimination, under which sexual harassment legally falls—but the opposite: Men harass women precisely because they are not discriminating between men and women.

Got that, ladies? When you are being "harrassed," we are just giving you true equality and treating you like "one of the boys."

Tuesday, July 3, 2007

How to Meet & Marry a Millionaire

Now why is Money Magazine posting this Cosmo type tripe?

How to meet and marry a billionaire Money magazine's field guide to the mating habits of the ultra rich

Basically, this article is all about how a woman can use strategies to try and meet and hook a billionaire or millionaire...with of course the strategic end game reserved for the every last two paragraphs of the article...

Despite all the luxuries that marriage ultimately heaps upon you, don't expect the proverbial bed of roses, counsels David Patrick Columbia, editor of, a Web site devoted to the doings of the fabulously classy.

Having observed many who married for money over the years, he says, "The rich person can be a pain in the ass," adding that he or she often demands to be waited on hand and foot, arm and toe.

But no matter how difficult things get, hang in there. The longer you stay, the more the court will award you if the marriage fails. There's no reason, after all, that your divorce shouldn't be every bit as lucrative as your marriage.

This article should be renamed "How to be a Shameless, Gold-digging Whore!"