Friday, September 7, 2007

The Language of Victimology

No Ma'am & Exposing Feminism have got me thinking further about the manipulation of language by the feminists to implement their agenda by controlling thought with language. As Rob points out in his post Nihilistic Newspeaking Nitwits

The most important institution which the Cultural Marxist PC Idiots have attacked is our language. The language controls our thoughts as a society. Of course, Orwell spoke of this in 1984, refering to it as "Newspeak."

Reading Rob's post and than the piece on Word Manipulation by Exposing Feminism got me thinking about another aspect of word manipulation that has become probably THE most powerful tool of ideological manipulation of the masses: the use of
"WE" to instill a sense of inclusiveness to create a cult of victimology to recruit and control the useful idiots complicit in implementing the feminist (or any other "-ist") agenda.

Rob's post linking to jezebel.com to make his point about the manipulation of the definition of domestic violence to indict men and excuse women provides the perfect example of what I'm talking about here....from one of the jezebel.com's commenters:

BY WARMAIDEN AT 08/28/07 06:59 PM

*snicker* It's okay, ladies. They can just consider it payback for binding our feet, shoving our chunklet asses into corsets, leaving chick babies on mountaintops, droolin over size 0 asses, and generally making us miserable for centuries.


So tell me "Warmaiden," what was the man's name who forced you to bind your feet? When did he force you to wear a corset? And how have you managed to live "for centuries" to experience so much misery at the hands of men?

When one takes a step back and looks a the bigger picture, we can see that in fact it is merely a mind control tactic to make people believe they are included in a larger group of victims, despite they themselves never actually being victimized. Indeed, the most useful of all useful idiots are the ones who believe themselves to be victims when they in fact have not experienced any real victimization.

Just as the modern black American who has never been enslaved fights for reparations, to the feminist who is free to work in any job she chooses - who in fact receives preferential treatment in the hiring process do to "equality" laws, she still identifies herself as part of the group of "WE the OPPRESSED FEMALE VICTIMS."

It is mind control, and it is one of the easiest, yet most successful means in which to motivate and control people. Here's another example of one of these "ladies" justifying female domestic violence because she is female, and females have been raped:

Image of ThaKadinskyPapers BY THAKADINSKYPAPERS AT 08/29/07 11:23 AM @KurticusMaximus: You're right. Violence is violence. And violence is usually wrong. But I can tell you that I don't feel one ounce of shame for what these women have written for the simple fact that too many of us have experienced the soul shattering fear that comes when you realize a man is evil enough to want to rape you.

So because some women, somewhere, "has experienced the soul shattering fear that comes when you realize a man is evil enough to WANT to rape you," (the evil deed does not even have to be committed...just the THOUGHT that he might) is justification for these other women to attack men's genitals, throw objects at them and threaten to kill them.

Promoting the cult of victim is indeed a powerful tool to get people to justify anything in pursuit of the goals of the extremist agenda.

7 comments:

Davout said...

Warmaiden has probably overrated herself in the looks department and found that men don't agree with her self-assessment.

I'll wager that her oversized bum will be perpetually planted on her pity pot until the Jeopardy biological time clock starts counting down. She needs some tough love from Tom Leykis!

Thakadinskypapers, might be very interested to learn that the (bogus) Brownmiller social sciences theory of rape (which she apparently blindly believes) according to which rape is purely an act of domination, and 'learned' by *only* men, also holds that women can 'learn' to enjoy rape, since everything can apparently be 'learned'.

Hawaiian Libertarian said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Hawaiian Libertarian said...

Nah. These shrieking harridan harpies couldn't handle two minutes of Leykis 101 without losing their minds.

Kim said...

When one takes a step back and looks a the bigger picture, we can see that in fact it is merely a mind control tactic to make people believe they are included in a larger group of victims, despite they themselves never actually being victimized. Indeed, the most useful of all useful idiots are the ones who believe themselves to be victims when they in fact have not experienced any real victimization

It also serves to promote division and further the 'us against them' concept. Feminism has been very successful in destroying the natural relationship between men and women by breeding discord and contention.

Anonymous said...

Just a point,I believe Catherine de medici invented corsets,I don't know whether she invented high heels but she was certainly the first to wear them which suggests
that she invented those as well,mind you she had to find some fool of a man to make them for her.

MikeeUSA said...

In the Bible the penalty for rape of a virgin girl is marrying her, never divorcing her, and paying her father some silver. What is women's opinion of the Bible? (Most church goers are women, and ofcourse, women who believe in women's rights).

(Deut 22)

I like the Bible. I wish it was inflicted more often.

Blademonkey said...

Hey, Hawaiian Lib, they need to have a mind before they can lose it. Most of them had one at one point until they went and got indoctrinated with this feminism stuff. The resulting ideological mess pretty much guaranteed a human that will spew catchphrases and slogans at you instead of reasoned arguments.

I can't read the comments that are posted at that jezebel site, might lose my lunch. The lack of logic is amazing.