The Only Honest Man in a Den of Thieves and Liars

And he got up before Congress yesterday and introduced THE ONLY BILL capable of ending our so-called economic crisis:

Before the US House of Representatives, February 4, 2009, introducing

The Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act, H.R. 833.

Madame Speaker, I rise to introduce legislation to restore financial stability to America's economy by abolishing the Federal Reserve. Since the creation of the Federal Reserve, middle and working-class Americans have been victimized by a boom-and-bust monetary policy. In addition, most Americans have suffered a steadily eroding purchasing power because of the Federal Reserve's inflationary policies. This represents a real, if hidden, tax imposed on the American people.

From the Great Depression, to the stagflation of the seventies, to the current economic crisis caused by the housing bubble, every economic downturn suffered by this country over the past century can be traced to Federal Reserve policy. The Fed has followed a consistent policy of flooding the economy with easy money, leading to a misallocation of resources and an artificial "boom" followed by a recession or depression when the Fed-created bubble bursts.

With a stable currency, American exporters will no longer be held hostage to an erratic monetary policy. Stabilizing the currency will also give Americans new incentives to save as they will no longer have to fear inflation eroding their savings. Those members concerned about increasing America's exports or the low rate of savings should be enthusiastic supporters of this legislation.

Though the Federal Reserve policy harms the average American, it benefits those in a position to take advantage of the cycles in monetary policy. The main beneficiaries are those who receive access to artificially inflated money and/or credit before the inflationary effects of the policy impact the entire economy. Federal Reserve policies also benefit big spending politicians who use the inflated currency created by the Fed to hide the true costs of the welfare-warfare state. It is time for Congress to put the interests of the American people ahead of special interests and their own appetite for big government.

Abolishing the Federal Reserve will allow Congress to reassert its constitutional authority over monetary policy. The United States Constitution grants to Congress the authority to coin money and regulate the value of the currency. The Constitution does not give Congress the authority to delegate control over monetary policy to a central bank. Furthermore, the Constitution certainly does not empower the federal government to erode the American standard of living via an inflationary monetary policy.

In fact, Congress' constitutional mandate regarding monetary policy should only permit currency backed by stable commodities such as silver and gold to be used as legal tender. Therefore, abolishing the Federal Reserve and returning to a constitutional system will enable America to return to the type of monetary system envisioned by our nation's founders: one where the value of money is consistent because it is tied to a commodity such as gold. Such a monetary system is the basis of a true free-market economy.

In conclusion, Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to stand up for working Americans by putting an end to the manipulation of the money supply which erodes Americans' standard of living, enlarges big government, and enriches well-connected elites, by cosponsoring my legislation to abolish the Federal Reserve.

Any guesses on who this might be?

"He Was Controlling!"

Seems like that's one of the number one justifications women use to rationalize their behavior.

Check out this article that Field Marshall Watkins posted about on his End of Men blog:

In the article that was the basis for his post, One in Ten Men Could Be Victims of Paternity Fraud, he details the story of a man who is informed by his cheating whore of a wife that the eldest of three girls that he's raised into adulthood is not his. She cuckolded him straight up.

But get her quote from the article...it really takes the cake:

He was the son of a painter and decorator, she the daughter of a tyre fitter and secretary. Lydia was 15 and still at school, Mark two years older and studying to be a baker.

He says: ‘It just worked. She was quite artistic, musically talented – a very good singer. She was basically an innocent girl from a small town who hadn’t really been anywhere, and my history wasn’t so dissimilar.

‘She was my first serious girlfriend. Until then I’d been more interested in cricket than girls.’ They married four years later in 1982.

Lydia has since said that Mark quickly became controlling and manipulative, hitting walls when he was angry and constantly threatening to leave her.

She also claimed that the gradual chipping away of her confidence left her emotionally vulnerable, which is why she was drinking heavily the night Elspeth was conceived.

Lydia, then a secretary with a computing company, was at a conference and ended up in a hotel room with an older colleague, Allen Mottram, known as David.

So let's get this straight: when he got angry, he'd hit the walls (probably because he wanted to hit YOU but he knew that would be wrong).

And he "threatened to leave her."

How is that "controlling?" If he threatened to leave you, tell him "GO THEN."

Instead, you take no personal responsibility, claim you were "emotionally vulnerable" and than cuckold your husband.

Isn't female empowerment in our Brave New World Order wonderful?!?!

The "Independent" Press

Been reading a google-book regarding the way in which tax-exempt foundations and internationalist-minded elite rich like the Rockefellers have funded the social engineering that has shaped our culture and society.

The book is: Mass Control: Engineering Human Consciousness




On page 42, I came across this quotation from Journalist John Swinton, giving a toast to the New York Press Club in 1953. Supposedly, Swinton was one of the most respected journalists of his time, and he was asked to toast the "independent" press of America.

His toast:

There is no such thing at this date of the world's history, in America, as an independent press.

You know it and I know it.

There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone.

The business of journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. you know it and I know it, and what folly is this toasting an independent press?

We are the tools of rich men behind the scenes. We are jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men.

We are intellectual prostitutes.

Wonder if his fellow journalists applauded his toast, eh?

This was back in 1953...think anything's changed for the better with regards to our mainstream press?