Friday, October 24, 2008

At least she's being honest...



However, to be 100% straightforward, she should also include the phrase...

"...and 18 years of child support, garnished from your paycheck to finance my lifestyle!"

Hat tip: The Elusive Wapiti

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Jennifer Aniston: Another Feminist Poster-Girl


I must admit it...I often visit this website called: The Superficial - Because You're Ugly to indulge in a bit of celeb-u-tard schaudenfraude.

This latest bit comes from the recent announcement that the former Mrs. Brad Pitt, "Friends" sitcom star Jennifer Aniston, has re-united with a former boyfriend, John Mayer...but under the condition that they get married and start popping out children.

This is hilarious.

For those that don't keep up with the ongoing lives of Hollywood Babylon, this is the basic timeline on the drama of Ms. Aniston's life. (oh and by the way, this is based PURELY on my recollections of the story coming from the tabloid headlines I read every time I'm in line at the grocery store, as well as the occasional tidbits from the Superficial - lest any of you think I would actually make a concerted effort to follow the lives of celebrities like a typical American female...).

- In the early 90's, Jennifer Aniston and Brad Pitt were married for 5 years and were Hollywood's most attractive couple. Millions of American females envy Jennifer, as Pitt was widely considered the most attractive man in America for a number of years.

- Brad wanted to start having children, but Jennifer was in the midst of climbing her career ladder, as her sitcom show "Friends" was becoming a huge ratings success. Her and all her co-stars had re-negotiated their contracts making them all very well paid millionaires. Jen did not want to have children because it would inhibit her career track.

- Brad Pitt leaves her for Angelina Jolie. They subsequently start having children in addition to adopting orphaned third world kids from all over the world, creating a pretty big family...especially for modern Hollywood standards.

- Jennifer suffers emotional breakdowns and issues public denials and regrets about Brad leaving her for a younger, hotter, more fertile woman...saying she always wanted to have kids with him, etc.

- Jennifer goes through a string of high profile romances with various celebrities, including the aforementioned John Mayer.

- After a number of flings, and now reaching the age of 39...NOW she's ready to settle down and 'start' a family. John Mayer expresses interest in re-uniting with her, but she will only do so under the conditions that they get married and start having kids.

Can you say BABY RABIES?

It's a good thing she's wealthy TV and movie star, because fertility clinic treatments are quite expensive...

Friday, October 17, 2008

"Bi-Partisanship" Means Only One Thing




As one who has done extensive reading about the current sham of our political system here in the US, I am thoroughly convinced that the true agenda of the folks behind the social engineering that have infected society with such atrocities as the feminist assault on the nuclear family, a Federalized public school system designed to deliberately dumb down the masses, and the continued loss of our liberty and rights in the name of "security," is to keep the masses distracted with the "Right vs. Left" political theater while the true agenda of a one-world, socialist government continues it's long march towards global domination.

While many conservatives have been excited about the Sarah Palin nomination, I believe she is either being duped into thinking she can effect conservative changes in the government should she succeed...or she's just like McCain and Obama, and is nothing more than a pawn, bought, sold and controlled by the true powers that be.

In either case, the proof is in the pudding. Look no further than the latest call for "Bi-partisanship" by Obama and McCain...


"Now is a time to come together - Democrats and Republicans - in a spirit of cooperation for the sake of the American people," Democratic nominee Barack Obama and Republican nominee John McCain said. "The plan that has been submitted to Congress by the Bush administration is flawed, but the effort to protect the American economy must not fail."


If Palin were a true "conservative republican" how could she continue to run as McCain's partner in this blatant socialization of the financial markets? On principle, she should resign in the face of this blatant push for a government takeover of a private market.

If Obama were a true "working-class democrat" how could he be for giving millions of tax payers dollars to the filthy rich, corrupt corporations?

Answer: because right/left, democan and republicrat are really two sides to the same thing.

Glenn Sacks also recently wrote a blog post that demonstrates exactly what I'm saying:

No Friend to Fathers Among the Presidential & Vice-Presidential Candidates

All four of the candidates for president and vice-president this year have displayed hostility to fathers in one way or another.


That's because both parties will talk about marriage and family values, yet the true issues that are detrimental to the state of marriage and family values is the divorce industry and misandrist legislation like VAWA. Instead, We the Sheeple are deliberately brainwashed and distracted into arguing about Same Sex Marriage and other garbage that truly only effects a very small percentage of a very small special interest group, while the true agenda of destroying nuclear families and enriching the divorce industry, and replacing Fathers with an extensive welfare state and child support peonage system continues to be the huge elephant in the room nobody ever talks about in mainstream political discussions and media coverage.

Whenever I hear the term "bi-paritsan," I remember what Thomas Sowell once wrote years ago in one of his columns (I'm paraphrasing from memory):

"Whenever I hear the term 'bi-partisan' the only thing I think of is BOHICA: Bend Over, Here It Comes Again."