Friday, September 5, 2008

We Are All Marxists Now




While googling and reading various articles linked to by all the blogs I frequent while surfing the 'net, I often come across interesting articles that I skim and bookmark for later reading.

Sometimes it can be months before I go back and look at it again.

Today, is one such day in which I decided to clean up my bookmarks...and I came across this article I had bookmarked quite a long time ago: Marxism, American Style.

Many MRA bloggers have pointed out the many links between Marxism, Communism and Feminism...and this article actually does not mention Feminism at all - but nevertheless, one needs to avoid being myopic and missing the forest for the trees by focusing only on Feminism when analyzing the current state of our culture and society.

I found this article truly disheartening as it attests to just how far along this once great country has been subverted towards our eventual future of lost sovereignty, and the coming New World Order the power elites have planned for us...

The article begins with a classic quote...one in which I would like for every talking head and pundit to repeat (of course I won't be holding my breath waiting for this...) whenever any politician speaks about "Democracy."


“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, followed always by a dictatorship. The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations has been 200 years.” – Alexander Fraser Tytler, Lord Woodhouselee


Remember that we could never have reached the point we are now had the Suffragette's campaigned for and eventually achieved "Universal Suffrage." That was the beginning of the end.


American leaders claim to reject collectivist ideology, but our government has come more to resemble Marx’s grasping hand of the super-state than Adam Smith’s invisible hand of laissez-faire capitalism.

Listed below are the ten points of Marx’s Communist Manifesto and examples of ways in which these principles are exercised through federal policy in contemporary America.


I've listed the following ten points, but leave out the explanations from the article...you can click and read the link yourself. However I would like to point out that all ten of these points have been at least partially implemented ((if not wholesale) to varying degrees in good ole U.S. of A.

1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.

5. Centralization of credit in the banks of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.

6. Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the state.

7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.

8. Equal obligation of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.

9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country.

10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc.


We are all Marxists now.

Thursday, September 4, 2008

Re-Thinking My Last Post...




It's been quite the media frenzy today regarding Palin and her speech last night. It's been refreshing to check out all of the mainstream media sights and for ONCE not see wall-to-wall coverage of that half-white socialist from my home State being lauded as the next messiah to lead America to the promised land of HopeChange.

However, this piece has gotten me to reconsider my previous position of not voting for McCain/Palin for a bit.


Palin: wrong woman, wrong message
by Gloria Steinem
Sarah Palin shares nothing but a chromosome with Hillary Clinton. She is Phyllis Schlafly, only younger.

By Gloria Steinem
September 4, 2008


I'm not going to copy/paste her article, afterall, this is the nitwit feminazi bitch that coined that abolutely idiotic, "Women need men like a fish needs a bicycle" phrase...

...but the fact that she is so opposed to Palin is endorsement enough as far as I'm concerned!



Nah. Still not voting for McCain...but will certainly enjoy it immensely should Obama lose to McCain and the feminists lose their freakin' minds that the biggest accomplishment by an American Woman was achieved by a person who does NOT live her life according to the tenet's that feminists proscribe!

Wednesday, September 3, 2008

Does Palin for VP Mean I'm Voting for McCain?


In a word...no.

Yes, Palin is certainly the best possible candidate McCain could have chosen to try and win back the conservative base that has been sorely disappointed in McCain winning the nomination.

Yes, she does appear to have some real credentials in terms of libertarian, small-government philosophy.

Yes, she is a staunch 2nd amendment supporter, and she is staunchly pro-life.

All things for which I approve of.

But that doesn't mean I'm gonna vote for the McCain/Palin ticket, because if there's one thing we can be certain of, it's this: no matter how conservative or libertarian Palin is in philosophy and governance style, she will STILL be forced to toe the McCain party line should they win the election...which would of course maintain the status quo of expanding of the Federal Government's size, scope and power.

Finally, whether this was a blatant pander to disenchanted Hillary supporters, or not, the following quote gives us insight into this ladies ideology when it comes to gender politics:


"It was rightly noted in Denver this week that Hillary left 18 million cracks in the highest, hardest glass ceiling in America. But it turns out the women of America aren't finished yet, and we can shatter that glass ceiling once and for all!"


That line sounds like a feminist in conservative/libertarian clothing to me.

"None of the Above" still sounds like the best ticket in 2008 to me.