Repeal the 19th Amendment

The only way in which the social engineers have corrupted our society at it's very foundation was through the agent of an expanded and empowered federal government. In short, the elite want control over humanity for their own benefit, but you cannot control a free people, so freedom must be done away with.

And the most effective way in doing so was to reverse the course of events that the Founding Fathers of America had set into motion - by destroying the building blocks of society, the nuclear family.

But the assault on the institution that resulted in the development of the greatest superpower nation the world has ever seen -- the nuclear family -- was one that has taken years to accomplish. Slowly but surely it has been achieved with incremental steps in a dialectical process that has fundamentally altered the entire dynamics of society and human being's interpersonal relationships.

The first step was to empower a centralized, Federal government. The original foundation of the nation was a loose affiliation of the States, each an autonomous entity held together by a document designed to limit the accumulation of power by a Federal entity. It would be exceedingly difficult to achieve the radical social engineering of the society we currently live under, in a country as set up and designed by the Founding Fathers.

So the first step was to empower the Federal Government...and the means of doing so was accomplished through Women's suffrage.

Is There Really a Bias Against Women in Politics? History Suggests Otherwise

Academics have for some time pondered why the government started growing precisely when it did. The federal government, aside from periods of wartime, consumed about 2 to 3 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) up until World War I. That was the first war in which government spending didn't go all the way back down to its pre-war levels. Then in the 1920s, non-military federal spending began steadily climbing.

President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal — often viewed as the genesis of big government — really just continued an earlier trend. What changed before Roosevelt came to power that explains the growth of government? The answer is women's suffrage.

For decades, polls have shown that women as a group vote differently than men. Without the women's vote, Republicans would have swept every presidential race but one between 1968 and 2004.

The gender gap exists on various issues. The major one is the issue of smaller government and lower taxes, which is a much higher priority for men than for women. This is seen in divergent attitudes held by men and women on many separate issues.

There you have it in a nutshell.

The power and ability to expand the size and scope of the Federal Government to effect the changes to society to corrupt the nuclear family and subvert the national identity was to give women the "freedom" to vote.

Except the first thing women collectively did was to vote to limit, reserve, restrict or outright eliminate individual freedoms, starting with alcohol consumption.

In all seriousness, the 19th amendment is a Pandora's box. Ron Paul has a more realistic chance to win the Presidency this Fall than there is any kind of hope that the 19th amendment would ever be repealed.

Too many generations of women have been indoctrinated into the idea that their "freedom" is defined by the right to vote for more government dependency, more misandrist gender advocacy, the institution of unconstitutional peonage and unmitigated support for the divorce and abortion industries.

It's going to take a society-wide, cataclysmic upheaval of apocalyptic proportions to reverse the trends that started with the advent of female suffrage.

The Enemy is Always the State

From Llew Rockwell's "The Enemy is Always the State"

Let me state this as plainly as possible. The enemy is the state. There are other enemies too, but none so fearsome, destructive, dangerous, or culturally and economically debilitating. No matter what other proximate enemy you can name — big business, unions, victim lobbies, foreign lobbies, medical cartels, religious groups, classes, city dwellers, farmers, left-wing professors, right-wing blue-collar workers, or even bankers and arms merchants — none are as horrible as the hydra known as the leviathan state. If you understand this point — and only this point — you can understand the core of libertarian strategy.

One thing is for certain - in American politics, the Democrat party, the liberal and so-called "progressive" movements are the home of the feminist movement. The conservative and Republican side is generally the home of the anti-feminist faction of America's body politic - but in the three-card monte game called the "Two Party System," the feminist agenda has continued it's long, hostile march through American society, leaving millions of lives damaged, destroyed and altered irrevocably, regardless of whichever party has had control. This is what's referred to as the dialectical process.

Whether the Republicans or the Democrats have controlled the Executive branch and the Legislative branches of government, the feminist, anti-family agenda has continued to proceed with it's implementation of reforming a country that what was once the land of the free and the home of the brave into the land of the Fee and the home of the Slave.

Remember this the next time you see a Republican politician standing in front of a crowd, or on your TV or broadcasting their voice over the radio, speaking of "family values" and "defending marriage."

While the Republican or so-called "compassionate" conservative talks about Homosexual marriage as a threat to the institution of marriage, we who have unplugged from the Matriarchy know damn well that gay marriage means NOTHING in the grand scheme of things. Two gays having a little formal ceremony and legal recognition like a heterosexual couple has, doesn't destroy marriage. Feminism's agenda of no-fault divorce; the extra-constitutional family court system; the peonage of husbands and fathers to ex-wives and their alienated children; the domestic violence industry racket; the anti-male, anti-father cultural zeitgeist and the subversion of higher education into centers of indoctrination by the feminists have done the job just fine in destroying the institution of marriage.

Yet you never hear NOT ONE SINGLE SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE/REPUBLICAN EVER TALK ABOUT THE TRUE PROBLEMS THAT ARE DESTROYING THE INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE.

Because the game Republicans versus Democrats is really just a diversion to keep the nation distracted and divided so that the real agenda can continue to be implemented - the abrogation of American national sovereignty and subsuming of the USA into a Socialist One-World Global Governance.

This is why in my opinion that it is the Libertarian political philosophy that is the ONLY one tenable to the MRA movement.

Because the only sure principle in American politics is that whether it's Democans or Republicrats who control the government, the real problem is the size, scope and power of the centralized Federal government.

It is through this empowerment of the institution of Government that the ruthless, family-destroying agenda of the feminists have been legislated, subsidized, promoted and disseminated. And voting for the Republicans is not going to change this one bit, as they've already proven by their "compassionate conservatism" (i.e. socialism) that they are just as committed to growing the size and scope of the government as the liberal socialist Democrats ever were.

Of course, there are always exceptions to every rule...and in this case, that would be Ron Paul.

Another Sign of the Times in the Age of Matriarchy

The Slump: It's a Guy Thing

They eat from the same dishes and sleep in the same beds, but they seem to be operating in two different economies. From last November through this April, American women aged 20 and up gained nearly 300,000 jobs, according to the household survey of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). At the same time, American men lost nearly 700,000 jobs. You might even say American men are in recession, and American women are not.

What's going on? Simply put, men have the misfortune of being concentrated in the two sectors that are doing the worst: manufacturing and construction. Women are concentrated in sectors that are still growing, such as education and health care.

As the blue collar sector declines, the pink collar sector ascends. While the writer of the article poses various hypothetical guesses as to why this is happening, those of us that have unplugged form the Feminist Matrix understand EXACTLY what is going on.

The troubles for the American male worker, while exacerbated by the current slump, are hardly new. The manufacturing sector is in long-term decline, and construction goes through repeated booms and busts. Meanwhile women are graduating from college at higher rates than men.

Hmmmm...the ongoing, dialectical process of the feminization of higher education, the increased promulgation of the cultural zeitgeist that directs young women to focus on education and careers instead of forming families, and the normalization of misandry in the mainstream media has been going on for the past 30+ years.

The results of this social re-engineering are becoming more and more evident to those of us that recognize the truth. But the folks that remain oblivious cling to the delusion that we still live in a Patriarchal society oppressive to women.

Another reason politicians aren't making hay of the plight of males is that they are well aware that women are in no mood for it. Working-class and lower-middle-class women in particular, whether or not their men have jobs, are feeling economically stressed, says Bill McInturff, a pollster for Senator John McCain. He adds, "In focus groups they talk about how 'I'm taking care of my parents, his parents, buying groceries, taking kids to the doctor.' These women are tired."

See, never mind that men struggle with job loss and making ends meet to support their families, it's all about how the women feel.