Female Predators in our Public Schools

It's commonly accepted in American society that most predators and statutory rapists are usually men, and that somehow women are the "fairer" sex.

Yet the number of female "teachers" in our public school teachers is quite staggering when you actually see just how many cases have occurred recently across the country -

The following list comes from WND:

Sextra Credit
The big list: Female teachers with students
Most comprehensive account on Internet of women predators on campus

Now, without putting much thought to the topic, I would guess that most people who first hear about the issue would hazard a guess that the majority of these female predators are hideously ugly hags and cows that are sexually desperate because no man their own age would touch them with a 10 foot pole.

It certainly appears that way for some of the following...

























Oooooh those, poor little boys that were taken advantage of by these hideous cows....just seeing their pictures and reading the descriptions of their crimes makes me nauseas.

But than we have cases like these...


Amy McElhenny, 25:
Charged with having a sexual relationship with an 18-year-old male student, the 25-year-old Hebron High School Spanish teacher and former Miss Texas contestant will not be serving any jail time after a Denton County, Texas, grand jury refused to issue an indictment in September 2006.




Angela Comer, 26:
Middle-school teacher from Tompkinsville, Ky., fled with her alleged lover, her 14-year-old male student, before being tracked down in Mexico where she reportedly planned to marry the boy.









Carrie McCandless, 29:
The former Colorado social-studies teacher, who also happens to be married to the principal, was charged in November 2006 with having had sexual contact with a 17-year-old male student during an overnight school camping trip.


And of course...one of the most famous cases:

Debra LaFave, 25:
Tampa, Fla., area teacher received no jail time despite having sex with her 14-year-old male student in a classroom and her Hillsborough County home.



I guess some fairly attractive women can also be sexual predators of young boys as well.

There are a lot more stories of female predators in our public schools found at that WND page...but there is a common thread amongst almost all of these stories: just about all of these women that were caught in sexual "relationships" with their students recieved little to no jail time for their crimes.

Even when a judge points out the apparent double standard between how female sexual predators are treated versus male predators, the judge STILL gives these ladies light or no sentences....like the following case:


Cameo Patch, 29:
Substitute teacher at Tooele High School in Tooele, Utah, arrested for allegedly performing oral sex on a 17-year-old male student. The sexual activity was allegedly consensual, and reportedly took place off school grounds after the pair had exchanged phone numbers in a restaurant.



"In November 2006, Patch was sentenced to no jail time, despite comments from the judge that a man would have likely gone to prison."


The feminist movement claims to be about equality for the sexes....

...how about some equality in the sentences for convicted molesters and statutory rapists?!?!

Feminist Myopia

Read this following myopic viewpoint from this whining feminut:

Are Men More Intelligent Than Women?

A professor in Canada has recently released the findings of a “scientific” survey which claims men are more intelligent than women. According to the test results of 100,000 participants men scored 3.63 IQ points higher than women across all levels including family economics.

Although these findings are controversial they could also be the breakthrough that the fairer sex has been seeking for generations. If the male is now considered to be more capable than the female in family economics then maybe the 21^st century will bring about a complete role reversal whereby the woman will go to work and earn the main income whilst the man maintains the home. He will be able to display his newly discovered expertise by juggling the housekeeping money to pay all the bills, doing the shopping, the housework, getting the kids ready for school each morning, preparing a family meal in the evening, getting the kids ready for bed and then washing up and tidying before finally finding the time to sit and relax for a while to watch his favourite television programme. Even then there will still be things to do so the man will need to multitask by watching the TV whilst ironing his wife’s clothes ready for her to wear for work in the morning, sewing the tears in the children’s school uniforms that will only need doing again after their next bout of exuberant playtime and subconsciously planning the following days family curriculum.

Whilst the man will be expected to manage the household right up to the last minute before crawling into bed for a welcome rest the woman has also had her share to do as well. On her return home from an eight hour day at work, kicking off her shoes and flopping onto the sofa she may have to endure the inconvenience of getting up again to go to the fridge to retrieve a beer and even open it herself because the man is too busy cooking the dinner in between repeatedly separating the kids who are arguing over who’s turn it is on the Xbox.

Dinner is served up at the dining table but the woman wants hers on the coffee table in the living room so she can still watch the football on the television. The match is vital, everything depends on the result; it could mean relegation to a lower division for her supported team! Like most other women who are fanatical about their football team she supports a Premier League side based three hundred miles away from where she actually lives. The man cannot understand the reasoning behind her over enthusiastic support of Liverpool when they live on the Isle of Wight.

Dad and the kids eat like civilised people in the dining room whilst mum lounges on the sofa with her dinner just about within arms reach on the coffee table. Whilst her eyes are firmly fixed to the TV she attempts to load a fork and guide it to her mouth but drops the lot on the carpet as she jumps up shouting profanities at the referee for failing to award Liverpool a penalty after a gust of wind made one of their players fall over.

Dinner is over and half of hers is on the floor where it will stay until dad can make the time to come and clear it up and take away her empty plate. She is too tired to do anything; she has been to work all day making important decisions so in her opinion she has done her fair share. At five ‘o’clock on Friday she finished her work period; great, no more work until Monday morning!

Her husband is exhausted but she cannot understand why, after all, he’s just been at home all the time doing whatever he wants to do while she has had to work a 35 hour week. It’s ten ‘o’clock and he announces he is going to bed for an early night. Her eyes immediately light up at the thought of an early night; to a woman an early night means sex and she sulks childishly when her advances are spurned because the man complains he is tired and has a headache.

Notice in her attempts at being clever by reversing the sexes, she goes into lengthy detail about just how onerous and difficult it is for the "husband" doing the traditional housewife role, while the "wife" is a sports obsessed slob acting like the "husband" is simply a domestic slave to make sure dinner is ready, cleans up after "her" while catering to "her" every whim, while STILL managing to cope with child rearing and domestic chores. This is feminist myopia on plain view for all to see...barely a mention of the often difficult and dangerous work a provider may endure to support the family.

Oh the inhumanity and oppression.

One could easily reverse this cheap, transparent tactic:

After sending the kids off to school, the "husband " loads the breakfast dishes into the dishwasher, throws the laundry into the washing machine and vacuum's the house with the state of the art Kirby his "wife" just bought for him. This takes about an hour or so, after which he sits down with a cup of coffee and enjoys an hour of his favorite Soap Opera. After this, he gets on the phone and gossips for an hour with his "boyfriends" before planning to meet up with them at the Starbucks at the shopping mall.

After a few hours of shopping and gossiping, the "househusbands" all leave the mall to pick up the kids from school and head home to ensure the homework gets done and dinner is ready for the "Wife" when she gets home from her day of hard, manual labor in the coal mines that leave "her" completely exhausted, risking "her" life to put food on the table and to make the minimum payments on "His" credit cards that are all maxed out to support "his" shoe and jeans collection that stuff their closets to overfull.

But when "she" gets home, her duties are not over...the minute she walks in after a mind-numbing day of sheer physical labor in horrid conditions, he greets her at the door with immediate nagging about why the yard work hasn't been done yet, the garbage needs to be taken out and "HER" kids were misbehaving again.

All she wants to do after such a long hard day at the mines is take a shower, eat some dinner and watch the game with a beer or two before dropping to sleep from exhaustion from earning a living for her family from the sweat of her brow...but "he" never lets up with the nagging and it drives her so crazy, she leaves her dinner to get cold and her beer to get warm, and she misses the last quarter of her favorite teams playoff game so she can finally take the trash out and mow the lawn with the last rays of sunlight left...just so he'll finally stop nagging her to death.

Than, after finishing her cold dinner and warm beer, she has the NERVE to expect sex! Doesn't she know how tired he is from taking care of the kids and cleaning the house!?!??! (That's not even mentioning how tiring it is to walk around the mall with his boyfriends for a couple of hours, maxing out the credit cards for new clothes and the absolutely VITAL nicnacs and trinkets that adorn the house).


See...aren't cheap, rhetorical essays so much fun!??!

Why Should the US Model Itself After Europe's Socialist Systems?

The liberals, so-called "progressives" and Democrats in American politics are the primary supporters of the implementation of feminism. All one needs to do is visit the fever swamps of leftist thought to see that this is true...sights like Democrat Underground, Pandagon and Daily Kos are overflowing with feminist propaganda and misandry.

What one can also see is frequent references to the so-called "superior" model of European socialist states, and that we need to move the United States in their direction in terms of social and economic policies.

What these useful idiots don't realize is that looking to such Euorpean "utopias" is quite instructive as to why their thoughts, ideas, platform and agenda are the means to destroying society, one family at a time...

From the Ludwig Von Mises Institute, What Has Government Done to Our Families?

In turning to Sweden, we find a classic case of bureaucratic manipulation to destroy the state's principal rival as a focus of loyalty: the family...


...The rise of the welfare state can be written as the steady transfer of the "dependency" function from the family to the state; from persons tied together by blood, marriage or adoption to persons tied to public employees.

This is socialism is distilled: Government taking over the traditional dependency function of the nuclear family. Hmmm, where have we heard this before? Perhaps it was a certain politician who is a radical feminist masquerading as a moderate Democrat? One who wrote a book entitled "It Takes A Village?"

The process began in Sweden in the mid-19th century, through bureaucratic projects that began dismantling the bonds between parents and their children.

The article than goes on to outline the steps the Swedish Government has taken to accomplish this dismantling of the bonds between parents and their children...what's frightening is that when one reads how the Swedish Government went about this process, one realizes that those same measures have already been implemented here in America!

In classic pattern, the first assertion of state control over children came in the 1840s, with the passage of a mandatory school attendance law.

----------

The next step came in 1912, with legislation that effectively banned child labor in factories, and to some degree on farms. Again, the implicit assumption was that state welfare officials were better judges of the use of children's time, and more compassionate toward children than parents were or could be.

----------

The final step came at about the same time, when the Swedish government implemented a program of old-age or retirement pensions that quickly became universal. The underlying act here was the socializing of another dependency function, this time, the dependency of the "very old" and the "weak" on mature adults. For eons, the care of the elderly had been a family matter. Henceforward, it would be the state's concern.

Taking all of these reforms together, the net effect was to socialize the economic value of children. The natural economy of the household, and the value that children had brought their parents—be it as workers in the family enterprise or as an 'insurance policy' for old age—was stripped away. Parents were still left with the costs of raising the children, but the economic gain they would eventually represent had been seized by "society," meaning the bureaucratic state.

The predictable result of this change, as an economist of the "Gary Becker School" would tell you, would be a diminished demand for children, and this is exactly what occurred in Sweden. Starting in the late 1800s, Swedish fertility went into free-fall and by 1935, Sweden had the lowest birthrate in the world, below the zero-growth level where a generation just managed to replace itself.

Sounds familiar, doesn't it? The Swedish model of socialism...the system the Left in America wants to move us towards, is a recipe for cultural and national suicide. Plummeting birth rates, disintegrating families and a burgeoning welfare state that becomes increasingly bankrupt as the diminished younger generation no longer generates enough taxes to pay for the elder generations entitlements.

To all the leftists, socialists, democrats and feminists in this country that continually insist that we need to model our country like Europe...I say to you: if it's so bad here, and so great there, why are you still here?